About
Community
Bad Ideas
Drugs
Ego
Erotica
Fringe
Society
100 Ways to Disappear and Live Free
A Guide to Intelligence Collection Methods
A Study of Criminal History Records, as Maintained by the RCMP
A Theory of Information Warfare: Preparing for 2020
An Appraisal of the Technology of Political Control
Anonymity on the Web
Antisurveillance
Appeal Filed in Teenager vs. FBI Case
Beating The FBI
Big Brother's Little Helpers: Private Intelligence Networks
Biometric ID Cards
Bugs, Taps And Infiltrators: What To Do About Political Spying
Carnival Booth: Defeating Computer-Assisted Passenger Screening System
Carnivore FAQ
China's Golden Shield: Corporations and the Development of Surveillance Technology in China
Civil Liberties Under Threat
Cooperation of Telecommunications Providers with Law Enforcement
Cryptography: Policy and Technology Trends
Disabling CCTV / Video Cameras
Disabling Surveillence Video Cameras
EPIC Analysis of Draft Guidelines on Searching and Seizing Computers
EU Lawful Interception of Telecommunications
Eavesdropping On the Electromagnetic Emanations of Digital Equipment
Electronic Surveillance in a Digital Age
Email Privacy Law Review
European Union and FBI Launch Global Surveillance System
Executive Guide to the Protection of Information
Exposing The Global Surveillance System
Exposing the Global Surveillance System
FBI Investigates Domestic Activities to Identify Terrorists
Fingerprints
General Counterdrug Intelligence Plan
Gmail Bedfellows
Hiding Yourself
Homeless Tracking Fact Sheet
How COINTELPRO Helped Destroy the Movements of the 1960s
How Private Is My Credit Report?
How Tax Returns are Selected for Audit
How To Create A New Indentity
How To Get Lost
How to Get Anything on Anyone
IRS Cups It's Ear to Cordless Phones
IRS and Terrorist-Related Information Sharing
Identification, Anonymity and Pseudonymity in Consumer Transactions
Identification: A Move Towards the Future
Identity Cards: Frequently Asked Questions
Interception Capabilities 2000
Internet Security and Privacy for Activists and Citizens
Internet Security and Privacy for Activists and Citizens
Investigators Guide to Sources of Information
Is the NSA Sniffing Your Email?
Mail Surveillance
New Communications Technologies and Traditional Civil Liberties
Participating With Safety
Privacy Rights of BBS Users
Privacy or Service: Must We Be Forced to Choose?
Proof of Echelon?
Rebirth Methods In Post 9/11 USA
Recieve Your FBI File
Report of the Interception of Communications Commissioner for 2001
Schengen Information System: SIS II
Smart Cards: Opportunities for Public Sector Applications
Spook Words
Spy Secrets
Statements by the DCI and the NSA Director on Economic Spying
Surveillance Conference Overview
Testimony of Mark M. Ishikawa CEO BayTSP.com
The "Enemy Within": EU Plans the Surveillance of Protestors
The Group Trap
The Joy of Handles
The Libertarian Party Represents You
The Shocking Menace of Satellite Surveillance
The TEMPEST Method of Computer Data Interception!
The World of Surveillance
They Were Spying on Us: Detroit Police Red Squad
Touching Big Brother: How Biometric Technology will Fuse Flesh and Machine
U.S. Military Spying on Web Sites
UK ID Cards: Majority in Favor
UK National ID Cards - A Consultation
Using the Freedom of Information Act: Revised Edition
Watching the Watcher Watching You
Watching the Watchers: The Spanish Police
What To Do When They Ask For Your Social Security Number
Who's Afraid of Carnivore? Not Me!
Why Legal Action Should Be Taken for Installation of Surveillance Cameras in Public Places
Will We Be Under Total Surveillance?
Your Papers Please
Technology
register | bbs | search | rss | faq | about
meet up | add to del.icio.us | digg it

Gmail Bedfellows

Conservative nut-house the Heritage Foundation, usually content with slavishly supporting George W. Bush, congratulating themselves about invading other countries and fighting to outlaw abortion, has weighed in on Google's new Gmail service.

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Regulation/wm479.cfm

Andrew M. Grossman, senior Web Monkey at the Heritage Foundation has written a piece defending Google's right to suck up all of the Gmail and sell it bit by bit to advertisers. Which, make no mistake, is what they are doing.

Google's Gmail privacy policy states: "Google will never sell, rent or share your personal information, including your Gmail address or email content, with any third parties for marketing purposes without your express permission." You can find the privacy policy here: http://gmail.google.com/gmail/help/privacy.html

Unfortunately, they are being rather disingenuous. They are selling every word of every email to advertisers, and they clearly state that several paragraphs later: "When you are logged into your Gmail account, Google will display targeted ads and other relevant information based on the content of the email displayed."

They also state that the process of selling your email word by word is completely automatic, and no human is involved in reading your email. Just like the FBI's Carnivore! http://computer.howstuffworks.com/carnivore.htm

Also, the Electronic Frontier Foundation says "It is possible to link your email address to your search history using your unique Google "cookie" - a bit of software code that automatically allows both the Google search engine and Gmail to "recognize" you whenever you return to the website. Unless you delete it, this cookie will remain on your computer's hard drive for long enough to be effectively permanent." You can find that article here: http://www.eff.org/effector/17/12.php

So now all of your searches, and all of your email can be tied together, so there can be a complete picture of who you are, what you search for, and who you email with.

What a great idea, you say? Well, fine, then the system can be designed to clearly let you "Opt-In", instead of placing the burden on the consumer. The EFF also says that you can delete this cookie often and that will solve the problem. Of course, when was the last time you deleted a cookie? And why should you, because companies should be protecting your privacy from the beginning, not placing the burden on consumers.

Google's Gmail privacy policy says: "....residual copies of email may remain on our systems for some time, even after you have deleted messages from your mailbox or after the termination of your account."

So they can keep your email, essentially forever. And with 1GB of storage, that could be a lot of email.

So what, you say? Because of course, you would never use email to discuss anything that could come back to haunt you, like sexual extra-marital affairs, or business practices, or politically unpopular speech, would you???? No, of course not, because you realize that with a subpoena, any court, divorce courts included, could get all of your email. Since is convienantly stored forever, it's will be a treasure trove for lawyers and the police.

And of course, they reserve the right to transfer your 1GB of stored email to another company, in case of merger or acquisition. How would you feel if General Electric suddenly had all your email, or Lockheed-Martin, or Microsoft?

The list of groups expressing concern for the policies include Consumer Federation of America, the Electronic Privacy Information Center, the National Consumers League, the World Privacy Forum and 24 other groups which sent a letter of concern to Google's two chiefs, which you can find here: http://www.privacyrights.org/ar/GmailLetter.htm

The Web Monkey at the Heritage Foundation says that the groups and individuals expressing concern over these policies are in the minority, saying: "These “advocates” actually speak for a small minority of Internet users."

We all know there are good companies and Bad Companies in the world, some who's deeds and practices are exemplary, and some who just dont care, and will use every underhanded method to get what they want. Spyware is just one example.

Which is why this is so disappointing. Google, for most of us, has seemed like a different company, a company of good people doing great work. Their search engine has changed the way we use the web, and we have been better for it. I congratulate them on it. But the way forward is not to try to trick people into exchanging their privacy for extra features.

The Web Monkey from Heritage says that consumers should decide. Do you really believe the message of the Heritage Foundation is "power to the people"? Of course not. The message is that we, the People, should not be regulating corporations. Let the market decide, says the Great Web Monkey.

After all, it's worked so well with Microsoft.

P.S. If you want good private email, I always suggest PGP. If you want PGP-type encryption online, try Hushmail. You can download PGP for free from http://www.pgpi.org

You can also buy PGP from PGP Corp at www.pgp.com, or, my personal choice, directly from the man himself, Phil Zimmermann at www.philzimmermann.com

Hushmail is at www.hush.com

 
To the best of our knowledge, the text on this page may be freely reproduced and distributed.
 

totse.com certificate signatures
 
 
About | Community | Bad Ideas | Drugs | Ego | Erotica | Fringe | Society | Technology
Hot Topics