About
Community
Bad Ideas
Drugs
Ego
Erotica
Fringe
Society
100 Ways to Disappear and Live Free
A Guide to Intelligence Collection Methods
A Study of Criminal History Records, as Maintained by the RCMP
A Theory of Information Warfare: Preparing for 2020
An Appraisal of the Technology of Political Control
Anonymity on the Web
Antisurveillance
Appeal Filed in Teenager vs. FBI Case
Beating The FBI
Big Brother's Little Helpers: Private Intelligence Networks
Biometric ID Cards
Bugs, Taps And Infiltrators: What To Do About Political Spying
Carnival Booth: Defeating Computer-Assisted Passenger Screening System
Carnivore FAQ
China's Golden Shield: Corporations and the Development of Surveillance Technology in China
Civil Liberties Under Threat
Cooperation of Telecommunications Providers with Law Enforcement
Cryptography: Policy and Technology Trends
Disabling CCTV / Video Cameras
Disabling Surveillence Video Cameras
EPIC Analysis of Draft Guidelines on Searching and Seizing Computers
EU Lawful Interception of Telecommunications
Eavesdropping On the Electromagnetic Emanations of Digital Equipment
Electronic Surveillance in a Digital Age
Email Privacy Law Review
European Union and FBI Launch Global Surveillance System
Executive Guide to the Protection of Information
Exposing The Global Surveillance System
Exposing the Global Surveillance System
FBI Investigates Domestic Activities to Identify Terrorists
Fingerprints
General Counterdrug Intelligence Plan
Gmail Bedfellows
Hiding Yourself
Homeless Tracking Fact Sheet
How COINTELPRO Helped Destroy the Movements of the 1960s
How Private Is My Credit Report?
How Tax Returns are Selected for Audit
How To Create A New Indentity
How To Get Lost
How to Get Anything on Anyone
IRS Cups It's Ear to Cordless Phones
IRS and Terrorist-Related Information Sharing
Identification, Anonymity and Pseudonymity in Consumer Transactions
Identification: A Move Towards the Future
Identity Cards: Frequently Asked Questions
Interception Capabilities 2000
Internet Security and Privacy for Activists and Citizens
Internet Security and Privacy for Activists and Citizens
Investigators Guide to Sources of Information
Is the NSA Sniffing Your Email?
Mail Surveillance
New Communications Technologies and Traditional Civil Liberties
Participating With Safety
Privacy Rights of BBS Users
Privacy or Service: Must We Be Forced to Choose?
Proof of Echelon?
Rebirth Methods In Post 9/11 USA
Recieve Your FBI File
Report of the Interception of Communications Commissioner for 2001
Schengen Information System: SIS II
Smart Cards: Opportunities for Public Sector Applications
Spook Words
Spy Secrets
Statements by the DCI and the NSA Director on Economic Spying
Surveillance Conference Overview
Testimony of Mark M. Ishikawa CEO BayTSP.com
The "Enemy Within": EU Plans the Surveillance of Protestors
The Group Trap
The Joy of Handles
The Libertarian Party Represents You
The Shocking Menace of Satellite Surveillance
The TEMPEST Method of Computer Data Interception!
The World of Surveillance
They Were Spying on Us: Detroit Police Red Squad
Touching Big Brother: How Biometric Technology will Fuse Flesh and Machine
U.S. Military Spying on Web Sites
UK ID Cards: Majority in Favor
UK National ID Cards - A Consultation
Using the Freedom of Information Act: Revised Edition
Watching the Watcher Watching You
Watching the Watchers: The Spanish Police
What To Do When They Ask For Your Social Security Number
Who's Afraid of Carnivore? Not Me!
Why Legal Action Should Be Taken for Installation of Surveillance Cameras in Public Places
Will We Be Under Total Surveillance?
Your Papers Please
Technology
register | bbs | search | rss | faq | about
meet up | add to del.icio.us | digg it

Mail Surveillance

MAIL SURVEILLANCE

COPYRIGHT (C) 1991 BY FULL DISCLOSURE. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

In Full Disclosure #21 information was provided on ``mail covers'' where information on the outside of mail is recorded and provided to law enforcement and/or intelligence agencies. That article prompted questions by readers about when the post office might actually open mail and examine its contents. This article will explore an actual case where mail was opened and overview the postal procedure for mail openings in drug related cases.

Full Disclosure was able to obtain copies of documents filed in the federal court in Chicago, Illinois on February 2, 1990 that provide the following description of the mail opening program:

``The Chicago Division of the U.S. Postal Inspection Service has implemented an Express Mail Profile program at the Air Mail Facility (AMF) at Chicago O'Hare International Airport This program consists of a physical profile of Express Mail parcels which have been mailed to or from locations within the Northern District of Illinois. Targets were cities and/or areas of the United States which have been identified by law enforcement as being source areas for the distribution of narcotics, and/or controlled substances.''

The package in this particular case had a return address in Evanston, Illinois, delivery address in Chicago (the same name on both), and a post mark in San Francisco. However, another case that was reviewed showed the return address and postmark to correspond. The physical appearance in both cases were rather generic (according to the descriptions offered in the court files)

W. Earnst Hills of the Postal Inspection Service in Chicago said in an interview that this program was not ongoing but rather goes into effect whenever they get information from other agencies that indicate a suspicious package is on the way. For example, if a DEA agent observes a suspected drug dealer mail a package, the description of that package would be passed on and packages fitting that description would be selected for further review.

Hills' description of the program was that the Postal Inspection service would receive a tip from another agency that a suspicious package was on the way. They would then be looking for it at the O'Hare Air Mail Facility.

``One of the things we look for is fictitious return addresses'' said Hills. He didn't think there was a problem with it taking too much time to do this type of checking.

After packages have been selected by their physical description, they are subjected to drug sniffing dogs or machines. The dog test consists of several similar packages being put in separate nylon sacks and if the dog bites and scratches at the nylon sack with the suspect parcel, a search warrant is sought.

Hills indicated that the mail is not significantly delayed. Since most mail arrives very early in the morning they have plenty of time to examine it prior to the necessary delivery time later in the day. He also said that they will get a magistrate up in the middle of the night to issue a search warrant.

Upon receipt of the search warrant, the package is opened and inspected for contraband. Hills said that normally, the package will then be sealed back up and delivered by a postal inspector who will arrest the recipient after they accept the package.

What if a warrant is issued and the package does not contain contraband? Hills was unsure, stating that as far as he knew they had a ``100% success rate'' on finding contraband in parcels opened pursuant to a search warrant. However, he offered to find out what the procedure would be if the package didn't contain contraband.

Hills findings were that there has been ``no incident like that in Chicago.'' However, when it has happened in other locations that have put a copy of the search warrant in the package and had it delivered normally. Hills cautioned, however that it wasn't necessary standard procedure to do that, only that it had been done in some cases.

The above is reprinted from Full Disclosure Newspaper.

 
To the best of our knowledge, the text on this page may be freely reproduced and distributed.
 

totse.com certificate signatures
 
 
About | Community | Bad Ideas | Drugs | Ego | Erotica | Fringe | Society | Technology
Hot Topics