|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
register |
bbs |
search |
rss |
faq |
about
|
 |
 |
meet up |
add to del.icio.us |
digg it
|
 |
 |
| I Am The Law! Car accidents, personal injury, defamation, libel, malpractice, fraud, bankruptcy, debt, lawyers, corporate law, criminal law, jail, police conduct, prison, employment laws, workers compensation, real estate law, divorce and family court, taxes, education, immigration, military law, insurance, trademarks and copyrights, traffic and driving laws, class action law suits, and more. All of these are welcome topics in this forum.This forum is not intended to be a substitute for professional legal advice. Always seek the advice of professional with any questions you may have regarding a legal situation. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read on any web site, including this one. Fair warning: If you're stupid enough to post a confession it could be held against you in a court of law. |
|
#1
 2008-07-29, 12:07
|
|
|
What on earth went on here?
http://www.theage.com.au/national/barrister-wanted-no-greek-jurors-in-rape-trial-20080728-3md9.html?page=-1
Barrister wanted 'no Greek jurors' in rape trial
Steve Butcher
July 29, 2008
A BARRISTER has tried to exclude Greeks from being jurors in a Victorian rape trial because of a "common misunderstanding" they like anal sex.
John Desmond, a defence barrister for 23 years, initially told a County Court judge his submission was in fairness to the alleged victim, a Greek woman.
He told Judge Roy Punshon there was a misunderstanding in the community that "Greeks like anal sex" and that the woman might be seen as compliant and "in fact wanting it".
"That would be doing her a disservice, it wouldn't be fair to either party," Mr Desmond said earlier this month.
When Judge Punshon refused the application saying he would not have a jury empanelled that excluded Greek people Mr Desmond then made the application on behalf of his client "in fairness" to him.
Asked by Judge Punshon what the issue was with his client, Mr Desmond replied: " I don't want a Greek juror empathising with a Greek complainant (the woman), your honour."
Judge Punshon responded: "I'm not going to have a jury selected on the basis of race, nationality."
The discussion took place on July 8 as Mr Desmond's client and two other men represented by other barristers prepared to plead not guilty to a number of charges.
The trial ended last week when Mr Desmond's client was acquitted and the other men were found guilty.
In a transcript of the exchanges obtained by The Age, Mr Desmond began his submission by telling Judge Punshon it would be appropriate that there be a "general exemption for a category of potential juror to be inquired of in the case here".
Asked by Judge Punshon what was the issue of fairness to the complainant, Mr Desmond replied: "Greeks.
"See, the allegation here, this is a Greek complainant and her nationality will be established on the evidence, your honour, it's part of the narrative and there are allegations here of anal penetration and there's a common misunderstanding in the community that Greeks like anal sex and she might readily then be seen to be compliant and in fact wanting it.
"That would be doing her a disservice, it wouldn't be fair to either party."
Asked by Judge Punshon what he meant by not being fair to either party, Mr Desmond said: "Well, there's a misconception in the community that Greeks readily engage in anal sex."
Judge Punshon: "Is there?"
Mr Desmond: "They (the jurors) should determine this case upon the evidence, not on the misconceptions."
Judge Punshon: "I will tell them that."
Mr Desmond: "We should avoid the risk, your honour."
Judge Punshon: "Pardon?"
Mr Desmond: "We should avoid the risk."
Judge Punshon: "Well, I'm not going to have a jury empanelled where no Greek people can sit on the jury."
Mr Desmond: "Well, it may be there's only two or three on the panel, your honour, I can't
"
Judge Punshon: "There will be, but I'm not going to exclude someone simply because they are Greek."
The Age is unaware of what the final composition of the jury was.
|
|
#2
 2008-07-30, 06:53
|
|
|
Re: What on earth went on here?
If you can disqualify potential jurors because they're opposed to the death penalty, then why not disqualify Greeks because they like anal sex?
lol...
|
|
#3
 2008-07-31, 10:03
|
|
|
Re: What on earth went on here?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Punk_Rocker_22
If you can disqualify potential jurors because they're opposed to the death penalty, then why not disqualify Greeks because they like anal sex?
lol...
|
'Runaway jury' or not, that kind of behviour doesn't sound too just to me.
|
|
#4
 2008-07-31, 20:56
|
|
Regular
|
|
Land of the Ires.
|
|
Re: What on earth went on here?
'Runaway jury' or not, that kind of behviour doesn't sound too just to me.
The actual issue here isn't one's predilection for anal sex, but the barrister's attempt to stereotype an ethnic/national group and discriminate against them.
Excluding all greeks is clearly unjust as trial by jury should be made by a selection of a person's "peers". Asking each juror if they like anal sex and then seeking their dismissal would probably be more acceptable.
Do greek women like anal sex? That would be hot if they do.
|
|
#5
 2008-08-01, 17:23
|
|
|
Re: What on earth went on here?
Do greek women like anal sex? That would be hot if they do.
Just make sure that you're more than an arms length away when you ask one.
Trust me *ouch*
|
|
 |
 |
To the best of our knowledge, the text on this page may be freely reproduced and distributed.

totse.com certificate signatures
|
 |
 |
About | Community | Bad Ideas | Drugs | Ego | Erotica | Fringe | Society | Technology
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|