|
|
 |
|
|
|
register |
bbs |
search |
rss |
faq |
about
|
|
|
meet up |
add to del.icio.us |
digg it
|
|
|
| My God Can Beat the Shit Out of Your God For discussing any and all religious viewpoints. Intolerance will not be tolerated. Keeping your sense of humor is required. Posting messages about theological paradoxes is encouraged. |
 |
|
# 1
2007-04-05, 19:45
|
|
Moderator
|
|
dodging the rain and tractors
|
|
habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
(before anyone comments, i know the latin sucks...its a joke.)
Okies, I thought i'd post this by way of introduction for those who don't know me and also to quash any conspiracy theories (see, I do know this forum!).
LostCause herself asked Root to make me co-mod of this forum. My appointment is in no way any sort of critic of her modding .
I am a big fan of the way she has always modded this forum and made it her own and i have no intention of changing anything, rather i'm here to back her play.
In light of recent events I think LC felt a second mod would be a good idea, as an anti spam measure and to slap down the occaisional troll.
So no mystery there people.
Right, for those who don't know me already: I was a very regular poster here until about a year ago. Since then I've joined in the odd thread but haven't been around much. The older regulars here all know me...some even like me...a few even actually respect my knowledge (but only a few).
Back in another lifetime I trained for the priesthood (protestant).
Last time I checked there were about 5 people here whose knowledge of the bible equaled or bettered my own (they know who they are).
I also have indepth knowledge of the classic christian 'sects' . Infact Jehovah's Whiteness are forbidden from talking to me because of my knowledge of their history and the darker bits that they don't like the rank and file to know.
Oh and incase you hadn't already noticed I am also somewhat arrogant and a bit of an arsehole when it comes to religious debate. I rarely quote suorces because if your trying o debate with me without knowing them then you probably have nothing worth saying anyway. :P
Those who know the soft cuddly jackketch of S&A might be a bit surprised!
__________________
Eoghan, Samwise gamgee. The truth is out there, people.
|
# 2
2007-04-05, 20:21
|
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackketch
The older regulars here all know me
|
I know you!
I like you!
Quote:
|
...a few even actually respect my knowledge
|
...err
Quote:
|
Those who know the soft cuddly jackketch of S&A might be a bit surprised!
|
awww. Well I'm glad you a new mod of this fourm. It sounds like you know alot of unusual stuff about religion. If you don't mind me asking, what religion are you?
Last edited by Punk_Rocker_22; 2007-04-05 at 20:21.
Reason: I fail at tags
|
# 3
2007-04-05, 20:29
|
|
Regular
|
|
.:six degrees of synesthesia:.
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Welcome and congrats, Jack. I am sure you will do a fine job, and perhaps My God can be restored to what it once was.
|
# 4
2007-04-05, 20:42
|
|
Regular
|
|
Massachusetts USA
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
All hail!
He fulfills his role doing spam control and he patrols for trolls hey hey!
|
# 5
2007-04-05, 20:50
|
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Hopefully you'll do a better job than LostCause. If you delete spam and keep trolls like Masta Thief in check, then you'll be alright by me.
|
# 6
2007-04-05, 20:59
|
|
Regular
|
|
.:six degrees of synesthesia:.
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hare_Geist
Hopefully you'll do a better job than LostCause. If you delete spam and keep trolls like Masta Thief in check, then you'll be alright by me.
|
*coughs* See what I mean, Jack ? Heh.... *coughs*
P.S. Hare_Geist: Um...AIM ? 
|
# 7
2007-04-05, 21:31
|
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Great, I felt this forum needed a new moderator. Hopefully I'll start posting here regularly and fierily again.
|
# 8
2007-04-05, 21:51
|
|
Moderator
|
|
dodging the rain and tractors
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hare_Geist
Hopefully you'll do a better job than LostCause. If you delete spam and keep trolls like Masta Thief in check, then you'll be alright by me.
|
I have to disagree. LC does a really good job. No forum is harder to mod than this one, because people get really intense about their faiths or lack of it.
Yes , even the 'Fedora v. Ubuntu' doesn't invoke such passions!
Also we have a large number of, what I consider, 'heavy weight' posters who tend to know their stuff.
For example, I already know that your knowledge of science far far outstrips mine....and you aren't the only one here.
LC has always managed to stop this forum descending into a theological bear pit and modded with a fair and humour filled touch.
__________________
Eoghan, Samwise gamgee. The truth is out there, people.
|
# 9
2007-04-05, 22:24
|
|
Regular
|
|
.:six degrees of synesthesia:.
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackketch
I have to disagree. LC does a really good job. No forum is harder to mod than this one, because people get really intense about their faiths or lack of it.[/b]
|
1. One cannot bite the hand that feeds. 
2. You are in the minority in your beliefs. If absenteeism is what you consider good moderation, suit yourself.
3. Moderating this forum would NOT be difficult. Close the things that are off topic, and delete spam. Just like every other forum.
Quote:
|
Yes , even the 'Fedora v. Ubuntu' doesn't invoke such passions!
|
I literally LOL'd.
Quote:
Also we have a large number of, what I consider, 'heavy weight' posters who tend to know their stuff.
For example, I already know that your knowledge of science far far outstrips mine....and you aren't the only one here.
|
I fail to see why this is a relevant point, but I thank you for the compliment anyway. 
Quote:
|
[b]LC has always managed to stop this forum descending into a theological bear pit and modded with a fair and humour filled touch.
|
When she is *here*. That is the key element. I have little to no issue with her moderation skills when she is able to grace us with her presence. Her wit, knowledge of the topic, etc are all great, but they matter little when they are rarely witnessed.
Anyway, I didn't mean to turn this thread into a LC-bashing event. I like her, I've got no problems with her personally, I am glad there is a new moderator, and....HAPPY EASTER, EVERYONE !
|
# 10
2007-04-05, 22:25
|
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
^ Still haven't answered my question
|
|
#11
2007-04-05, 22:33 |
|
Moderator
|
|
dodging the rain and tractors
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
1. One cannot bite the hand that feeds. :p
uhm this is jackketch you're talking to. If i felt it warranted it or it just made my motor turn then i'd not only bite a feeding hand but also saute it in garlic and red wine.
You know how I feel about female body parts.
:P
|
|
#12
2007-04-05, 22:43 |
Q777 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
I also have indepth knowledge of the classic christian 'sects' . Infact Jehovah's Whiteness are forbidden from talking to me because of my knowledge of their history and the darker bits that they don't like the rank and file to know.
Please enlighten us. I am interested. How far does it go beyond the false dates about the coming of Jesus.
|
|
#13
2007-04-05, 22:46 |
|
Regular
|
|
.:six degrees of synesthesia:.
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Well, there is a reason she chose you in particular to co-mod, and it's not because of your prevalent posting habits, as of late. You admit this much yourself in the thread starter.
It's apparent that some other form of bonding has been occurring between the two of you elsewhere.
Oh, well. :o
*grabs her some sauteed girls parts from Jack's grill, and wonders faintly if she had been French*
|
|
#14
2007-04-05, 22:54 |
|
Moderator
|
|
dodging the rain and tractors
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Digital_Savior
Well, there is a reason she chose you in particular to co-mod, and it's not because of your prevalent posting habits, as of late. You admit this much yourself in the thread starter.
It's apparent that some other form of bonding has been occurring between the two of you elsewhere.
Oh, well. :o
*grabs her some sauteed girls parts from Jack's grill, and wonders faintly if she had been French*
|
LOL what did I say about conspiracy theories?! We mod together on S&A and are both comfortable with each other's style.
Outside that, I've had even less contact with her than I have had with you this last year or so.
So, no 'bonding', no e-sex, no nothing. |
|
#15
2007-04-05, 22:59 |
|
Regular
|
|
.:six degrees of synesthesia:.
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Well, now...I said NOTHING about eSex...you certainly are the right man for the S&A forum. LOL
So, does this mean you intend to start posting here more ? Why have you been so absent lately ? Surely the standard "OMGWTF where do I stick it??!!111one" questions over in S&A aren't consuming all of your precious time. ;)
|
|
#16
2007-04-05, 23:03 |
postdiluvium
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
I fail to see why this is a relevant point, but I thank you for the compliment anyway.
OMFG, I just LOL'ed at work.
|
|
#17
2007-04-05, 23:04 |
|
Moderator
|
|
dodging the rain and tractors
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Please enlighten us. I am interested. How far does it go beyond the false dates about the coming of Jesus.
Like any human organisation they have had their fill of corruption, vice and hypocrisy. All of which have been documented (if one is prepared to search).
In particular the so-called 'Swiss Declaration' is a dark stain. Which in a nutshell was that, while in Hitler's Germany JW's were being sent to concentration camps for refusing national service, the Swiss Watchtower corp. issued a declaration that the Swiss brothers should do national service and that it was good and wholesome.
I used to live in Germany, where until only a few years ago JW's were still being sent to prison for refusing to do national service and it used to upset them greatly to be told about this part of their history.
Don't get me wrong, ALL churches are made up of imperfect human beings and all have fallen short at some point.
Straight laced 7th day Adventist? Well ahundred years ago they fell into the 'fucking for christ' or 'love in' trap.
Baptist, prim and proper? I've seen the photos of their pulpits draped with the swastika.
Mormon? Gunned down women and children .
The list is endless.
|
|
#18
2007-04-05, 23:08 |
|
Regular
|
|
.:six degrees of synesthesia:.
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
OMFG, I just LOL'ed at work.
I was going to add that I some totseans would disagree with him, but didn't want to spoil the fun for you, PD.
:)
|
|
#19
2007-04-05, 23:10 |
|
Regular
|
|
.:six degrees of synesthesia:.
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Last edited by jackketch : 2007-04-05 at 16:07. Reason: cos i fucked up.
LOL! That was cute.
|
|
#20
2007-04-05, 23:11 |
postdiluvium
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
I was going to add that I some totseans would disagree with him, but didn't want to spoil the fun for you, PD.
:)
Oh... I agree that there are people in this forum that definately know their stuff. I do not post much in this forum because whatever is need to be said is already said before I even read the threads. But, really, not EVERYONE here knows their stuff.
|
|
#21
2007-04-05, 23:14 |
|
Regular
|
|
.:six degrees of synesthesia:.
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
He didn't say "everyone" did. He said some did, and that I know more about science than he does.
You lol'd. I took that to mean you disagreed with him.
So....what're you talking about ?
|
|
#22
2007-04-05, 23:20 |
postdiluvium
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Nevermind... Anywho, this is good news for My God. My God will now have a more available moderator.
|
|
#23
2007-04-05, 23:23 |
|
Regular
|
|
.:six degrees of synesthesia:.
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Another point for the hometeam. You're definitely in the minority, Jack. Sorry, love.
|
|
#24
2007-04-06, 00:27 |
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
I think DS has a thing for jackketch...
|
|
#25
2007-04-06, 00:41 |
|
Moderator
|
|
dodging the rain and tractors
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Punk_Rocker_22
I think DS has a thing for jackketch...
|
Well thats no surprise is it? She is female and the Lord cursed me with being irresistable to all women. Tis a cross I bear stoically. |
|
#26
2007-04-06, 00:44 |
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
So you said at one point you were training to become a pastor, why did you decide to do that and what was the outcome? some other background info would be cool.
|
|
#27
2007-04-06, 01:47 |
|
Moderator
|
|
dodging the rain and tractors
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
I've 'stuck' this thread for the simple reason that its 03:00 and I'm off to bed. I don't want to wake up to any "wtf jackketch is mod??!11' or 'Congratz @ jack' threads.
Please post any comments on my bid for world domination here and only here. Thanks
|
|
#28
2007-04-06, 01:52 |
postdiluvium
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Please post any comments on my bid for world domination here and only here. Thanks
The women seem to listen to you. Whoever controls the pussy, controls the world. THE WURLD IZ THAR 4 THE TAEKING... TAEK IT! ITZ URZ!
|
|
#29
2007-04-06, 03:10 |
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Salutations and congratulations:D, live long and prosper  |
|
#30
2007-04-06, 03:21 |
|
Regular
|
|
█ █ █
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Digital_Savior
He didn't say "everyone" did. He said some did, and that I know more about science than he does.
You lol'd. I took that to mean you disagreed with him.
So....what're you talking about ?
|
Nevermind... Anywho, this is good news for My God. My God will now have a more available moderator.
Oh lulz. *cough lol cough* :D |
|
#31
2007-04-06, 03:48 |
RiVAL
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
(before anyone comments, i know the latin sucks...its a joke.)
the only latin joke i have is we really go to get our borders fixed first the illegals take our crappy jobs and now they're taking our moderator jobs... wow that joke really sucked...
|
|
#32
2007-04-06, 04:03 |
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
He didn't say "everyone" did. He said some did, and that I know more about science than he does...
Read his post again. Jackketch quoted Hare_Geist, and responded to him, not to you.
Aside from that slight misunderstanding, I'm curious as to why you are so vocal as to LostCause's moderating habits. You haven't even posted in MyGod since the Origins and Civil Liberties thread .
|
|
#33
2007-04-06, 10:24 |
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
An active mod! How refreshing.
:)
|
|
#34
2007-04-06, 16:19 |
|
Regular
|
|
.:six degrees of synesthesia:.
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Aside from that slight misunderstanding, I'm curious as to why you are so vocal as to LostCause's moderating habits. You haven't even posted in MyGod since the Origins and Civil Liberties thread .I'm curious why you're so curious about my opinion of her moderation habits ?
In short, don't worry about what I'm vocal about. You don't agree with me about anything, anyway, so it hardly matters.
|
|
#35
2007-04-06, 16:35 |
|
Moderator
|
|
dodging the rain and tractors
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
I'm not even going to bother arguing with you about this since it's obvious you're not paying attention to the flow of the conversation.
uhm actually Digi I was responding to Hare (he and I spoke in an evolution thread I did the other day).
But as you do infact know far more than me about science (at least I take that from some your threads) I let your compliment-stealing stand.
Or did you just dye your hair blonde? :P |
|
#36
2007-04-06, 16:38 |
postdiluvium
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
But as you do infact know far more than me about science (at least I take that from some your threads) I let your compliment-stealing stand.
And you were like this totse father figure to me. :(
|
|
#37
2007-04-06, 16:51 |
|
Regular
|
|
.:six degrees of synesthesia:.
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
uhm actually Digi I was responding to Hare (he and I spoke in an evolution thread I did the other day).
But as you do infact know far more than me about science (at least I take that from some your threads) I let your compliment-stealing stand.
Or did you just dye your hair blonde? :P
Oh, yes. I see it now. My bad. I apologize. I will correct my post to truckfixr. Thanks for the clarification.
I told you what I did with my hair in my last email to you. But I guess since I have offended your tender sensibilities by standing up to Kate, you've decided to ignore anything about me that may prove likeable ? :P
|
|
#38
2007-04-06, 16:58 |
|
Moderator
|
|
dodging the rain and tractors
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Oh, yes. I see it now. My bad. I apologize. I will correct my post to truckfixr. Thanks for the clarification.
I told you what I did with my hair in my last email to you. But I guess since I have offended your tender sensibilities by standing up to Kate, you've decided to ignore anything about me that may prove likeable ? :P
The only offence you have ever given me was your blasphemous attempt to disfigure the beauty that god in his infinite wisdom gave you.
I noted from your last email that you have indeed now repented and that you no longer want to look like some genetic freak.
You and I are peaches as far as i'm concerned (thats London talk 'we have no problems with one another').
|
|
#39
2007-04-06, 17:06 |
|
Regular
|
|
.:six degrees of synesthesia:.
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Sweet. :D (that is American vernacular for 'awesome')
But you knew that. :p
|
|
#40
2007-04-06, 17:07 |
|
Regular
|
|
.:six degrees of synesthesia:.
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
One more thing: what does ILo mean (from your sig) ?
Ack....flood control is back.  |
|
#41
2007-04-06, 17:09 |
|
Regular
|
|
.:six degrees of synesthesia:.
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
And you were like this totse father figure to me. :(
Surely you must be joking...  |
|
#42
2007-04-06, 17:10 |
Source
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Sup?
5 Characters.
|
|
#43
2007-04-06, 17:14 |
|
Moderator
|
|
dodging the rain and tractors
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Digital_Savior
One more thing: what does ILo mean (from your sig) ?
Ack....flood control is back. |
I Love outcast(oc6) |
|
#44
2007-04-06, 17:16 |
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
I'm not even going to bother arguing with you about this since it's obvious you're not paying attention to the flow of the conversation.
Flow of the conversation? What flow of the conversation? By the time he made that comment, you had only made two posts, and he had replied to exactly none of them... He hadn't even acknowledged your existence. There was no conversation, let alone a "flow" to it. What bullshit.
Anyways, DS, did you get my e-mail? Is the hunt for my elusive post on? Tell the search party I'm extatic!:)
|
|
#45
2007-04-06, 17:20 |
postdiluvium
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Anyways, DS, did you get my e-mail? Is the hunt for my elusive post on? Tell the search party I'm extatic!:)
Believe it or not, I am part of that search party.
*salutes*
|
|
#46
2007-04-06, 17:22 |
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
some other background info would be cool.
Thumbs up to that!
(i miss that icon)
|
|
#47
2007-04-06, 17:26 |
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Believe it or not, I am part of that search party.
*salutes*
Really? Awesome. May I ask why? Do you actually think you saw me say that?
|
|
#48
2007-04-06, 17:30 |
postdiluvium
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Really? Awesome. May I ask why? Do you actually think you saw me say that?
No, I'm kidding. I just feel left out when Mods/former Mods start talking about stuff. :(
|
|
#49
2007-04-06, 17:53 |
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
No, I'm kidding. I just feel left out when Mods/former Mods start talking about stuff. :(
Heh, I thought it was strange when you said it, because I think she hates your guts.
Anyways, she had accused me of saying on totse that a girlfriend of mine had an abortion (and she concluded that that somehow made me a "murderer"). When I told her that she must be lying or confused because none of my (ex)girlfriends have ever had an abortion (to my knowledge) and that I don't talk about personal stuff on totse - a (ex)girlfriend's abortion would be pretty fucking personal - she proceeded to claim that I was hiding behind the fact that totse deleted old posts/threads.
Now that Jeff has added all the old threads (he backed up threads each week it seems) she is free to search through all the posts I've ever made. Even posts before she had registered as Digital_Savior.
|
|
#50
2007-04-06, 17:54 |
|
Regular
|
|
.:six degrees of synesthesia:.
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
I Love outcast(oc6)
Oh ! How cute. :)
|
|
#51
2007-04-06, 17:58 |
|
Regular
|
|
.:six degrees of synesthesia:.
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Flow of the conversation? What flow of the conversation? By the time he made that comment, you had only made two posts, and he had replied to exactly none of them... He hadn't even acknowledged your existence. There was no conversation, let alone a "flow" to it. What bullshit.[/b]
Is the edit button broken for you ?
Go back and read. The error has been corrected, much to your chagrin, I am sure.
[b]Anyways, DS, did you get my e-mail? Is the hunt for my elusive post on? Tell the search party I'm extatic!:)
I don't regularly check that email account, so no, I hadn't. I see it now, and can safely say that the content is inappropriate for this forum and this thread. I guess it really got under your skin, eh ? I haven't been back to My God 48 hours and you're pouncing already....haha.
Let the games begin. ;)
|
|
#52
2007-04-06, 18:00 |
postdiluvium
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Heh, I thought it was strange when you said it, because I think she hates your guts.
No doubt.
So did you break up with your ex because of the abortion?
|
|
#53
2007-04-06, 18:06 |
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
No, like I said, none of my girlfriends have ever had an abortion.
Oh, and sorry jackketch if I'm de-railing your thread :o
|
|
#54
2007-04-06, 18:12 |
|
Regular
|
|
.:six degrees of synesthesia:.
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Heh, I thought it was strange when you said it, because I think she hates your guts.
Anyways, she had accused me of saying on totse that a girlfriend of mine had an abortion (and she concluded that that somehow made me a "murderer"). When I told her that she must be lying or confused because none of my (ex)girlfriends have ever had an abortion (to my knowledge) and that I don't talk about personal stuff on totse - a (ex)girlfriend's abortion would be pretty fucking personal - she proceeded to claim that I was hiding behind the fact that totse deleted old posts/threads.
Now that Jeff has added all the old threads (he backed up threads each week it seems) she is free to search through all the posts I've ever made. Even posts before she had registered as Digital_Savior.
As I said, this is not appropriate, at the very least, for this thread.
However, http://tinyurl.com/2hm2y8][/B]considering that this is all that popped up in a simplistic search ([B) (the search word was abortion and the username was Rust) I'd say that the archives do not seem to prove a case for either of us.
I am sure you've discussed this topic numerous times since my hiatus began, and yet there isn't a single entry for the word "abortion".
If you have something further to add to this conversation, I suggest you take it to email, as there is really no appropriate place to have it on totse.
As I mentioned previously, I had to concede my point because I had no proof aside from my memory. Of course you don't quote that part in your email, but that's ok. Confirmation bias is common amongst humans. :)
|
|
#55
2007-04-06, 18:15 |
|
Regular
|
|
.:six degrees of synesthesia:.
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Oh, and sorry jackketch if I'm de-railing your thread :o
No, you're not, since it's obvious that you are derailing it. Meretricious apologies, FTL.
|
|
#56
2007-04-06, 18:16 |
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Is the edit button broken for you ?
Go back and read. The error has been corrected, much to your chagrin, I am sure.
And? Does that change anything I said? Of course not, so why would I edit my post?
There had not been a "conversation" since jackketch hadn't even acknowledged your existence let alone conversed with you. Your reply to him was not only rude, it was stupid. My post stands perfectly fine; no editing is needed.
I don't regularly check that email account, so no, I hadn't. I see it now, and can safely say that the content is inappropriate for this forum and this thread. I guess it really got under your skin, eh ? I haven't been back to My God 48 hours and you're pouncing already....haha.
Let the games begin. ;)
Don't flatter yourself. I just like to take any opportunity to show that you're a liar. This was a perfectly good chance to do just that.
I actually didn't even know you were "back to My God..." the posts you've made in this thread are the first ones of yours I've seen in a while.
|
|
#57
2007-04-06, 18:16 |
|
Regular
|
|
.:six degrees of synesthesia:.
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
No doubt.
So did you break up with your ex because of the abortion?
For the record, I don't hate your guts.
I don't even hate Rust's guts. I don't operate like he does. |
|
#58
2007-04-06, 18:23 |
postdiluvium
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
For the record, I don't hate your guts.
Don't patronize me.
|
|
#59
2007-04-06, 19:01 |
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
As I said, this is not appropriate, at the very least, for this thread.
However, http://tinyurl.com/2hm2y8 considering that this is all that popped up in a simplistic search (the search word was abortion and the username was Rust) I'd say that the archives do not seem to prove a case for either of us.
I am sure you've discussed this topic numerous times since my hiatus began, and yet there isn't a single entry for the word "abortion".
I don't really think I've discussed abortion since the last thread in Humanities; though I'm not enirely sure. However there does seem to be a problem with the search function.
You can wait till that problem gets fixed, or you can try search for all the posts I've made in a certain forum without using the keywords to restrict the search - a more grueling solution but still a solution.
If you have something further to add to this conversation, I suggest you take it to email, as there is really no appropriate place to have it on totse.
Totse is a perfectly fine place to have it. Maybe not in this thread, sure, but totse allows everyone to see just how fucking wrong you were. How you were either lying, or just simply unable to admit that you were mistaken.
As I mentioned previously, I had to concede my point because I had no proof aside from my memory. Of course you don't quote that part in your email, but that's ok. Confirmation bias is common amongst humans. :)
I don't mention it because what you did could hardly be called that. You were forced to admit that you couldn't prove your bullshit claims, but yet were still maintaining that I had said it. That's hardly "conceding" anything.
Here's an example of what you did. After having to admit that you had absolutely no evidence of your bullshit claims, you still make comments such as these:
" I recalled a debate he and I had about 2 years ago about abortion, wherein he tried to prove to me that he knew personally what he was talking about (he supported them and I opposed them) because he and his girlfriend had had one. I certainly didn't believe him then, and he conveniently denies having ever said that now, but I would never forget such a thing. We inevitably got into another abortion debate, and I brought it up. That's when he denied it."
No, you're not, since it's obvious that you are derailing it. Meretricious apologies, FTL.
Perhaps you need to learn the definition of "sorry". I can be sorry for "de-railing" the thread (technically it was already de-railed before, among other things, you asking what Ilo means) yet still continue to do so because I feel it's important. |
|
#60
2007-04-06, 19:17 |
|
Regular
|
|
.:six degrees of synesthesia:.
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
And? Does that change anything I said? Of course not, so why would I edit my post?
Because the error is no longer present. Your post has been rendered moot.
There had not been a "conversation" since jackketch hadn't even acknowledged your existence let alone conversed with you. Your reply to him was not only rude, it was stupid. My post stands perfectly fine; no editing is needed.
I not only recognized that, but apologized for it and edited my post to correct my mistake. What more do you want ?
It's not stupid to misread something. It's called "making a mistake". I know you salivate at the thought of my being wrong. This is not a mystery to me. It just makes you look pathetic, because you completely overreact every time you think you have an opportunity to point it out.
Suit yourself. *shrugs*
Don't flatter yourself. I just like to take any opportunity to show that you're a liar. This was a perfectly good chance to do just that.
I don't consider your attention flattering.
You don't need to articulate the obvious. Everyone who knows our history can attest to the fact that your sole mission is to discredit me.
I actually didn't even know you were "back to My God..." the posts you've made in this thread are the first ones of yours I've seen in a while.
That has little to do with what I said. You know I'm posting, and the first opportunity you get you pounce, disrespectfully derailing a thread by a fellow moderator in order to enact your revenge for embarrassing you (or whatever it is you think I have done to warrant your dedicated "affections").
|
|
#61
2007-04-06, 19:33 |
|
Regular
|
|
.:six degrees of synesthesia:.
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
I don't really think I've discussed abortion since the last thread in Humanities; though I'm not enirely sure. However there does seem to be a problem with the search function.
You can wait till that problem gets fixed, or you can try search for all the posts I've made in a certain forum without using the keywords to restrict the search - a more grueling solution but still a solution.
He's still working on the glitches, from what I understand, so perhaps soon. Let me know if you see the necessary repairs implemented.
Otherwise, I have better things to do than make you feel better. Sorry.
Totse is a perfectly fine place to have it. Maybe not in this thread, sure, but totse allows everyone to see just how fucking wrong you were. How you were either lying, or just simply unable to admit that you were mistaken.
I first indicated that this forum and this thread were inappropriate places to have this discussion, as it has nothing to do with the topic. My comment about not having an appropriate place to have the convo on totse was based on the fact that there aren't any forums dedicated to arguing with other members about past arguments...unless you'd like to take it to B&M.
I didn't take you for being quite that immature...
I don't mention it because what you did could hardly be called that. You were forced to admit that you couldn't prove your bullshit claims, but yet were still maintaining that I had said it. That's hardly "conceding" anything.I clearly said what I could: I remember the conversation happening, but have no empirical evidence, and anybody who SHOULD have remembered it as well (because it was discussed in IRC at great length) doesn't.
So, I recanted my statement outright. I said something to the effect of, "I withdraw my assertion, because I have no evidence."
I think that is perfectly acceptable.
Here's an example of what you did. After having to admit that you had absolutely no evidence of your bullshit claims, you still make comments such as these:
" I recalled a debate he and I had about 2 years ago about abortion, wherein he tried to prove to me that he knew personally what he was talking about (he supported them and I opposed them) because he and his girlfriend had had one. I certainly didn't believe him then, and he conveniently denies having ever said that now, but I would never forget such a thing. We inevitably got into another abortion debate, and I brought it up. That's when he denied it."
Perhaps you need to learn the definition of "sorry". I can be sorry for "de-railing" the thread (technically it was already de-railed before, among other things, you asking what Ilo means) yet still continue to do so because I feel it's important.Explaining my position to another totsean who was curious what we were talking about isn't "doing anything" offensive. My point is that my beliefs are irrelevant, because I have publicly and openly withdrawn my claim, as I cannot prove it, however much I know it happened.
As for the definition of "sorry", I know it very well, because unlike you, I trust the dictionary (unabridged versions or otherwise). I also apply the definitions of words in context.
Normal people, when they are sorry for a behavior, do not repeat said behavior. To apologize can be likened to admitting wrongdoing, because regret is a key element. If you know you're doing something wrong, then you would not willingly continue doing it if you were truly regretting it.
To pursue a regrettable wrongdoing because you feel it is important is unlikely, and thus leaves me with disbelief that you are, in fact, "sorry".
As for my asking what ILo means, it was not a derailment, as this thread is about Jack. It's not just about his moderating this forum. People are interested in who he is, what his qualifications are, etc.
It was appropriate to ask that question here.
Are we done now ? |
|
#62
2007-04-06, 19:47 |
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Because the error is no longer present. Your post has been rendered moot.
That doesn't render it moot. Like I already said, it serves to show how the reply you made at the time was rude and stupid.
I not only recognized that, but apologized for it and edited my post to correct my mistake. What more do you want ?
It's not stupid to misread something. It's called "making a mistake". I know you salivate at the thought of my being wrong. This is not a mystery to me. It just makes you look pathetic, because you completely overreact every time you think you have an opportunity to point it out.
It would have been a "mistake" initially when you first replied to jackketch, that I could agree with. However, when truckfixr pointed out that jackketch was replying to Hare_Geist and not to you, and you still maintained that you were correct, then that's not a mistake, that's plain old-fashioned stupidity.
I don't consider your attention flattering.
You don't need to articulate the obvious. Everyone who knows our history can attest to the fact that your sole mission is to discredit me.
Again, you're flattering yourself. That's not my sole mission.
Since it's obvious to you that I will take any chance to prove that you're a liar, then all the more reason why the fact that I am doing so now doesn't mean you've "gotten under my skin". Thank you.
That has little to do with what I said. You know I'm posting, and the first opportunity you get you pounce, disrespectfully derailing a thread by a fellow moderator in order to enact your revenge for embarrassing you (or whatever it is you think I have done to warrant your dedicated "affections").
Again, don't flatter yourself. You haven't embarassed me because you've proven absolutely none of your silly claims.
As for the derailing of this thread, don't be so modest. You've played a very important role in that seeing as you were already discussing things that had absolutely nothing to do with the fact that 'My God...' has a new mod. Not to mention the fact that you decided to reply to my post when it wasn't even directed at you; thus resulting in this current discussion.
|
|
#63
2007-04-06, 19:50 |
|
Regular
|
|
.:six degrees of synesthesia:.
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
As usual, the circle ensues when Rust is on the playground.
Yeah, we're done. I will not further contribute to the derailment of this thread.
|
|
#64
2007-04-06, 19:54 |
|
Moderator
|
|
dodging the rain and tractors
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Rust, Digi...enough already. This thread is supposed to be about me,me, Me, ME ME ME ME ME .
I don't want my time here as mod to start by deleting posts but
I will NOT allow you to detract from my attention whoring!
basta.
|
|
#65
2007-04-06, 20:01 |
|
Regular
|
|
.:six degrees of synesthesia:.
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
As for my asking what ILo means, it was not a derailment, as this thread is about Jack. It's not just about his moderating this forum. People are interested in who he is, what his qualifications are, etc.
It was appropriate to ask that question here.
Rust, Digi...enough already. This thread is supposed to be about me,me, Me, ME ME ME ME ME .
I don't want my time here as mod to start by deleting posts but
I will NOT allow you to detract from my attention whoring!
basta.
See ? I told you I didn't derail it by talking about Jack. ;)
|
|
#66
2007-04-06, 20:09 |
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
jackk, I saw your post but I had already written this reply. If you want to delete it, go right ahead, but I'm posting it. I would sent it via e-mail but that would allow her to hide her appalling behavior.
He's still working on the glitches, from what I understand, so perhaps soon. Let me know if you see the necessary repairs implemented.
Otherwise, I have better things to do than make you feel better. Sorry.
Just as I expected, you aren't even willing to take some time to support your bullshit claims. You're content with calling someone a murderer, accusing his girlfriend of having an abortion, and then not even bother doing some work to back that up. Pathetic.
I clearly said what I could: I remember the conversation happening, but have no empirical evidence, and anybody who SHOULD have remembered it as well (because it was discussed in IRC at great length) doesn't.
So, I recanted my statement outright. I said something to the effect of, "I withdraw my assertion, because I have no evidence."
I think that is perfectly acceptable.
You did a lot more than just that. You continued to claim that I had said what you claimed I had. That's not "conceding" anything. That's you acknowledging that you had nothing to support your bullshit yet continuing to make that claim anyway.
Explaining my position to another totsean who was curious what we were talking about isn't "doing anything" offensive. My point is that my beliefs are irrelevant, because I have publicly and openly withdrawn my claim, as I cannot prove it, however much I know it happened.
The point being that you "conceded" absolutely nothing, hence why this isn't "confirmation bias" as you so ignorantly claimed. I didn't mention what you had done because it's nothing close to "conceding" anything.
As for the definition of "sorry", I know it very well, because unlike you, I trust the dictionary (unabridged versions or otherwise). I also apply the definitions of words in context.
Obviously you don't since the definition of "sorry" allows me to be sorry for doing something yet still maintaining it was important to do so, and even continue to do so in the future.
For example, I can say I'm sorry to my boss for getting late to work yet still maintain it was important because I was, lets say... saving a kitten - and vow to save other kittens if the similar event were to occur in the future
As for my asking what ILo means, it was not a derailment, as this thread is about Jack. It's not just about his moderating this forum. People are interested in who he is, what his qualifications are, etc.
It was appropriate to ask that question here.
It, however, still not on the topic of his moderation. The contents of his signature have absolutely nothing to do with he being a new mod in 'My God'...'
Instead of admitting that this is the case - and that it's not such a big deal since derailing a thread isn't the great offense you're making it out to be - you conveniently ignore what you've done and point the finger only at me.
|
|
#67
2007-04-06, 20:22 |
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
jack, please don't delete anything here. It's all kind of pertinent, in a roundabout MGCBTSOOYG way...
But enough about them - let's talk about YOU!
...and what a great mod you must be for being able to appreciate old rivalries.
;)
|
|
#68
2007-04-06, 20:26 |
postdiluvium
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
It sounds like you two used to date. You know how ex-couples continue to fight after they have broken apart because they still have feelings for each other.
|
|
#69
2007-04-06, 20:44 |
|
Moderator
|
|
dodging the rain and tractors
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
...and what a great mod you must be for being able to appreciate old rivalries.
;)
Well I've 'known' both Rust and Digi for ages (in a non-biblical sense I hasten to add!). Both rank high on my list of 'Posters I WILL Take Some Crap From"
Also mods and ex-mods tend to get a bit more rope from me than regulars, simply because they tend to know where the boundaries are.
|
|
#70
2007-04-07, 00:23 |
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Jesus christ, I spent a good amount of time trying to figure out WTF was going on because I thought I was in S&A. I thought I was back in time or something but nothing mad any sense.
FUCK.
you guys trip me out
|
|
#71
2007-04-07, 04:05 |
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
...Also mods and ex-mods tend to get a bit more rope from me than regulars, simply because they tend to know where the boundaries are.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I seem to recall that the reason that someone is an ex mod is because she didn't know where the boundaries are.
|
|
#72
2007-04-07, 07:57 |
|
Regular
|
|
.:six degrees of synesthesia:.
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
I'll correct you, since I'm the "she" in question.
I was demodded because I moved an off topic thread (involving Jack and an admin) to a forum where it belonged, as per the RULES. The fact that said admin was receiving heat for modding me in the first place turned the moving of that thread into "justifiable cause" (convenience) for demodding.
My "crime" was not intentional, and other moderators have gotten away with far worse.
|
|
#73
2007-04-07, 08:17 |
|
Moderator
|
|
dodging the rain and tractors
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I seem to recall that the reason that someone is an ex mod is because she didn't know where the boundaries are.
There was no reason to put that 'she' in there and make it personal. A 'they' would have sufficed.
For the record I have always thought that 'she' was a good mod and while I understand acidmelt's reasons for demodding her, its one of the few things I disagree with him on.
|
|
#74
2007-04-07, 12:29 |
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
There was no reason to put that 'she' in there and make it personal. A 'they' would have sufficed.,.
You're right. In retrospect, I see that I probably should have used "they".
|
|
#75
2007-04-07, 13:25 |
postdiluvium
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Wow... this thread gets more awesome every time I check back on it.
|
|
#76
2007-04-07, 21:34 |
postdiluvium
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
So jackk... thinking about making a poll thread to ask what religion everyone practices pretty soon?
|
|
#77
2007-04-07, 21:42 |
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
I heet you *runs to room crying and slams door*!
|
|
#78
2007-04-07, 22:19 |
|
Moderator
|
|
dodging the rain and tractors
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sybil
I heet you *runs to room crying and slams door*!
|
waarom haat u me? pourquoi me détestez-vous ?
Why???!
HUH?
Did I, in some past life, kill your puppy? |
|
#79
2007-04-07, 22:27 |
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
lol, y u use google translator?
anyway, I was just kidding, here have some good rep points!
|
|
#80
2007-04-07, 22:33 |
|
Moderator
|
|
dodging the rain and tractors
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sybil
lol, y u use google translator?
anyway, I was just kidding, here have some good rep points!
|
babelfish for the french actually ('moi' instead of 'me'?)
oh fuck, tell me its haat-mij ??! |
|
#81
2007-04-07, 22:43 |
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
well, actually the "heet" I said, was actually ment as hate, in handicaped English, not as in "heet" in flemish :p if I'd say it in Flemish, then yes, I would of said "haat"
|
|
#82
2007-04-08, 00:20 |
postdiluvium
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
sybil, how long have you been training in Muay Thai?
|
|
#83
2007-04-08, 00:37 |
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
4 years
|
|
#84
2007-04-08, 23:31 |
Kooper0
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Could anybody point me to that thread DS moved and was demodded for?
|
|
#85
2007-04-08, 23:40 |
|
Moderator
|
|
dodging the rain and tractors
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kooper0
Could anybody point me to that thread DS moved and was demodded for?
|
http://tinyurl.com/2zl86t
OMG rereading that (haven't read it since), I'm amazed acidmelt didn't IP Range ban me on the spot.
Jeez....
Sometimes on totse I get narked,(get angry) but I don't think I've ever been that angry before or since here. I totally lost any control.
*is rather embarrassed now* |
|
#86
2007-04-08, 23:46 |
Kooper0
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
http://tinyurl.com/2zl86t
Thanks for that, interesting reading and strange overreacting.
|
|
#87
2007-04-08, 23:51 |
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
http://tinyurl.com/2zl86t
Don't be embarrassed, jack :)
The name of that thread was clarity 2.
Does that suggest there was a clarity 1?
DRAMA!
|
|
#88
2007-04-08, 23:58 |
Kooper0
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
http://tinyurl.com/2zl86t
OMG rereading that (haven't read it since), I'm amazed acidmelt didn't IP Range ban me on the spot.
Jeez....
Sometimes on totse I get narked,(get angry) but I don't think I've ever been that angry before or since here. I totally lost any control.
*is rather embarrassed now*
Being IP banned merely for questioning a mod, and having some valid points, would be ridiculously unfair.
|
|
#89
2007-04-09, 00:00 |
postdiluvium
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
From http://tinyurl.com/2zl86t
sometimes its just right to protest when something is wrong.
Fucking-A! Except when we regulars do that shit, we get banned. And I can't believe Digital was a moderator.
|
|
#90
2007-04-09, 00:13 |
|
Moderator
|
|
dodging the rain and tractors
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Don't be embarrassed, jack :)
The name of that thread was clarity 2.
Does that suggest there was a clarity 1?
DRAMA!
yep, Val had deleted it.
|
|
#91
2007-04-09, 00:15 |
|
Moderator
|
|
dodging the rain and tractors
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
From http://tinyurl.com/2zl86t
Fucking-A! Except when we regulars do that shit, we get banned. And I can't believe Digital was a moderator.
uhm back then i wasn't a mod! And not only did acidmelt not ban me but a while later I was modded for S&A.
|
|
#92
2007-04-09, 00:17 |
|
Moderator
|
|
dodging the rain and tractors
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Being IP banned merely for questioning a mod, and having some valid points, would be ridiculously unfair.
There was alot more to it than that.
|
|
#93
2007-04-09, 00:20 |
Kooper0
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
There was alot more to it than that.
Ah, I understand. Although I still don't see what would've caused a ban.
|
|
#94
2007-04-09, 00:21 |
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
A moderator moving an HB-like thread to HB constitutes De-modding?!
I bet DS was really thrown for a loop. |
|
#95
2007-04-09, 00:24 |
postdiluvium
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AngryFemme
A moderator moving an HB-like thread to HB constitutes De-modding?!
I bet DS was really thrown for a loop. |
Pssshhh... they probably realized their mistake in making DS a mod and used that as an excuse to correct their mistake. |
|
#96
2007-04-09, 00:26 |
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Pssshhh... they probably realized their mistake in making DS a mod and used that as an excuse to correct their mistake.
and they used jackketch as a PAWN in their plot to take her down!
man.
|
|
#97
2007-04-09, 00:48 |
|
Moderator
|
|
dodging the rain and tractors
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Enough already.
It was a dark time for this forum.
And now you all know just how far I had my head up my own arse that day.
|
|
#98
2007-04-09, 01:58 |
napoleon_complex
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AngryFemme
A moderator moving an HB-like thread to HB constitutes De-modding?!
I bet DS was really thrown for a loop. |
There was more to it than that. DS cleaned up threads that didn't need to be cleaned, if you catch my drift... |
|
#99
2007-04-09, 06:16 |
|
Regular
|
|
Behind the boat house
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
The allusions to "e-sex" make me el O el. Digital, seriously... The reason I chose Jack was simply because Jack and I mod S&A together so I know we work well together and have a similiar moderating style. I just didn't feel like putting myself through another fiasco having to pick someone, train them, and then possibly find out that I've hired a pit bull as a co-mod. This was just easiest for everyone involved. He's a good mod, he's quite knowledgeable, and he's unbiased.
Perhaps you think you or someone else should've been modded because they post more often, and you think that it's undemocratic to elect someone to be moderator that doesn't frequent the forum. But, &Totse is not a democracy and jackketch has been made mod based on his moderation skill and background.
If you want to discuss this further I'd be happy to via e-mail, but I don't think it's appropriate to drag this thread out too much longer.
Cheers,
Lost
|
|
#100
2007-04-09, 06:27 |
postdiluvium
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
.....
|
|
#101
2007-04-09, 10:01 |
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Looks like AngryFemme caught onto things, but putting that aside for a minute, you're here now, jackketch, so welcome and good luck.
|
|
#102
2007-04-09, 11:18 |
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
My mad insightfulness is sometimes a burden to carry around.
It sure was nice to hear the whole scoop, for once. Too much is left to the imagination around here. |
|
#103
2007-04-09, 21:39 |
|
Regular
|
|
Behind the boat house
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
and they used jackketch as a PAWN in their plot to take her down!
man.
What? I assume you're talking about DS? First of all, what would we be "taking her down" from? And to what? And how is modding jackketch making him a pawn in this imaginary game to "take her down" from nowhere to nothing?
Am I missing something?
Cheers,
Lost
|
|
#104
2007-04-09, 21:56 |
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
What? I assume you're talking about DS? First of all, what would we be "taking her down" from? And to what? And how is modding jackketch making him a pawn in this imaginary game to "take her down" from nowhere to nothing?
Am I missing something?
Cheers,
Lost
They are talking about DS being de-modded for moving/closing Jack's thread when he was arguing with AcidMelt. It wasn't about Jack's being made a moderator.
|
|
#105
2007-04-09, 22:04 |
|
Moderator
|
|
dodging the rain and tractors
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
People, I unstuck this thread for a reason, ie its served its purpose and should now slip gracefully down the board. And could we please have an end to the whole discussion about what happened back then.
|
|
#106
2007-04-09, 23:12 |
|
Regular
|
|
Behind the boat house
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jackketch
People, I unstuck this thread for a reason, ie its served its purpose and should now slip gracefully down the board. And could we please have an end to the whole discussion about what happened back then.
|
I agree, Jackketch. I didn't know anything about a Digital Savior thread closing fiasco. Digital Savior and Valmont weren't demodded for anything they did, per se. They were never supposed to be modded in the first place.
Cheers,
Lost |
|
#107
2007-04-09, 23:34 |
postdiluvium
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
They were never supposed to be modded in the first place.
+1 rep points
|
|
#108
2007-04-09, 23:44 |
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Forgive me, jack - (just this once)
...for I can't NOT ask whyyy? in response to this:
"They were never supposed to be modded in the first place."
Please show some leniency here, as it is only natural for villagers to be curious about the HMFIC's who run their village.
:)
Edit: Thanks, truckfixr - for clarifying in my absence up there ^
|
|
#109
2007-04-10, 05:40 |
|
Regular
|
|
.:six degrees of synesthesia:.
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
From http://tinyurl.com/2zl86t
Fucking-A! Except when we regulars do that shit, we get banned. And I can't believe Digital was a moderator.
Why not ? I am knowledgable on the topic of religion, and I spent my first 3,000 or so posts in this forum. I was dedicated to it, and many people valued my input.
Jack said it himself: I would have made a great mod of this forum.
|
|
#110
2007-04-10, 05:43 |
|
Regular
|
|
.:six degrees of synesthesia:.
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
I agree, Jackketch. I didn't know anything about a Digital Savior thread closing fiasco. Digital Savior and Valmont weren't demodded for anything they did, per se. They were never supposed to be modded in the first place.
Cheers,
Lost
Then you were spared the gory details, because I was demodded for the reasons I have previously specified, and Valmont was demodded for lying and throwing the names of Admins around in order to get away with breaking the rules.
If you'd like to see a copy of the email exchanges between I and acidmelt, I'd be happy to supply them to you.
Just because you're ignorant of something doesn't mean they didn't happen. Perhaps you should check things out before insinuating that I am a liar.
|
|
#111
2007-04-10, 05:46 |
|
Regular
|
|
.:six degrees of synesthesia:.
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AngryFemme
A moderator moving an HB-like thread to HB constitutes De-modding?!
I bet DS was really thrown for a loop. |
Believe me, I was. Shortly thereafter I left and have been in PLRC ever since. |
|
#112
2007-04-10, 11:01 |
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Well - except for that tiny (*cough-21-pages*) exhange in the O&CL thread, which you'll be pleased to find that jack re-opened for everyone's viewing pleasure.
And what perfect timing, wouldn't you say? Your debut back to My God... Thread re-opening...
I don't know about you, but I am absolutely beside myself with glee.
|
|
#113
2007-04-10, 11:47 |
postdiluvium
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
Just because you're ignorant of something doesn't mean they didn't happen. Perhaps you should check things out before insinuating that I am a liar.
Now now Digital, it doesn't sound like she is calling you a liar at all.
|
|
#114
2007-04-10, 13:35 |
|
Moderator
|
|
dodging the rain and tractors
|
|
Re: habem nova modum (we have a new mod)
No just no.
LC if you want to reopen this then do but as far as I can see it's finished.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
To the best of our knowledge, the text on this page may be freely reproduced and distributed.
totse.com certificate signatures
|
|
|
About | Community | Bad Ideas | Drugs | Ego | Erotica | Fringe | Society | Technology
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]()
![]()
|
Linear Mode
Switch to Hybrid Mode
Switch to Threaded Mode