Did you know that face-off was originally meant for them? It was set in the future too. Who thinks that would have made this movie extremly better? Starring them or jet li and jackie chan? I think travolta and cage were good but this is a movie meant for rivals. Who agrees?

(I know I spelled arnolds name wrong, Sue me)

If Face/Off had been an Arnie/Stallone vehicle then I would have spooged all over the cinema screen. I think it's safe to say that would be the greatest action movie of all time.

Stallone would have to win, though.

That would of been a way better movie, considering it is so fucking ridiculous in the first place.

It would be hard to see who won since I don't see Arnold playing many bad guys. I think it would be a shock to anyone to see who won.

With Travolta and Cage I could give a shit who won.

quote:

---

Originally posted by CarbonB:
That would of been a way better movie, considering it is so fucking ridiculous in the first place.

It would be hard to see who won since I don't see Arnold playing many bad guys. I think it would be a shock to anyone to see who won.

With Travolta and Cage I could give a shit who won.

---

I think Arnold would suit travolta's part perfectly. He played A damn good scary villian in terminater.I dont think stallone has played a bad guy before, Did he? Oh yeah and fuck you


[This message has been edited by HAND (edited 03-17-2006).]

Stallone played a bad guy in Spy Kids 3D, but I'll admit that's a really poor example.

Aside from that, I can't think of any other bad guy roles he's had.

quote:

---

Originally posted by WorldFamous:
Stallone played a bad guy in Spy Kids 3D, but I'll admit that's a really poor example.

Aside from that, I can't think of any other bad guy roles he's had.

---

Yeah, He would definitly be doing cage's part. It actually makes me laugh when I try to imagine him as a badguy. I wonder how the begining would have worked out. Shit, I want this movie made, Damnit

Willis would beat them both. Then smoke some cigarettes.

Are you kidding? Compared to Stallone and Arnie, Bruce Willis is a nobody.

The Die Hard films are great, but he's still the poor man's action hero.

Yea, I would have to agree for pure fucking tear em' up action Arnold and Stallone is where it was at.

If this movie would of been made, it would be sitting in my DVD collection right now waiting for me to pop it in for the 100th time.

Why can't we get some insane action movies like we used to?

Now everything has to be not only bullshit, which isn't a bad thing in action movies, but fucking CGI out the ass.

Bruce Willis as the good guy and maybe Willem Dafoe as the bad guy would make a great film.

John Tavolta is a funny guy. But only when he plays a stupid funny guy like as Vinny Barbarino or even the cat in Pulp Fiction. Not stupid but not to brite.

He's really a good actor but he gets casted from the wrong films. Broken Arrow really sucked with him in it. He overacted.

Holy shit that would have made me blow a load right through my pants, not because two huge motherfuckers fighting but that would be like the ultimate man movie. I mean you have the two single greatest action stars of all time, except they would have had to changed the script to have more shooting and more shit like that if it were those two. And also add in an "I'll be back" for Arnold or an "ADRIAN" for Sly.

Our governator will crush that pussy.

Who the hell voted for him, anyways?! I thought it was just a joke, hehe.

steven segal would pwn them both.

seagal would be a better match up for stallone. or chuck norris...

we need a new rambo movie. like, stallone, seagal, chuck norris, and vin diesel all start a revolution. fill it with guns, bombs, tanks, and whiney ass beaurocrats getting shot between the eyes.

Face/Off was written for actors.

quote:

---

Originally posted by Run Screaming:
Face/Off was written for actors.

---

No, It was written for shwatzanegger and stallone. Check Imdb if you dont beleive me. I said that in my post