|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
register |
bbs |
search |
rss |
faq |
about
|
 |
 |
meet up |
add to del.icio.us |
digg it
|
 |
 |
| Conspiracy! This forum is about the unexplained, whether it's political hidden agendas, secret societies, clandestine operations, alien life, political assasinations, CIA trickery, Masonic sub-plots, and other bits of Truth. |
|
View Poll Results: What do you believe?
|
|
The U.S. carried out the attacks.
|
 
|
97 |
32.88% |
|
The U.S. knew before hand but did not carry out the attacks.
|
 
|
104 |
35.25% |
|
The U.S. did not know and did not carry out the attacks.
|
 
|
81 |
27.46% |
|
Other (Please elaborate)
|
 
|
13 |
4.41% |
 |
|
|
#1
 2006-02-05, 20:48
|
Toxicwboy 
Regular
|
|
|
|
9-11
http://tinyurl.com/bs2w4
hmm...
|
|
#2
 2006-02-06, 05:36
|
TheLaUghiNgHeretic 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: 9-11
What is it.
|
|
#3
 2006-02-06, 05:55
|
hgbr45 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: 9-11
An hour! Too damn long
|
|
#4
 2006-02-06, 06:03
|
Toxicwboy 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: 9-11
it exploits the ideas of 9-11 and the thought that maybe, just maybe it was the government.
i'm definitely not a conspiracy kind of guy but this one threw me a curve.
|
|
#5
 2006-02-06, 19:47
|
ate 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: 9-11
Bush is worse than Hilter...
[This message has been edited by ate (edited 02-06-2006).]
|
|
#6
 2006-02-06, 22:49
|
|
|
Re: 9-11
quote: Originally posted by ate:
Bush is worse than Hilter...
not yet, not yet. Remember that. Richard siegel also made something like that. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3498980438587461603&q=911
|
|
#7
 2006-02-07, 01:12
|
|
|
Re: 9-11
how the hell could you see anything? It was all blur. I guess alex jones has some imagination.
|
|
#8
 2006-02-07, 03:31
|
|
Regular
|
|
Waukegon Illinois
|
|
Re: 9-11
I could see a lot. Someone needs to research the information about those plains to see that what he is a saying is true. George Bush has told a lot of lies. There could be something very wrong going on here.
|
|
#9
 2006-02-07, 04:00
|
|
Regular
|
|
Gold Coast Australia
|
|
Re: 9-11
one question: if what the video is telling is true, where did the actual planes go??
i was thinking: maybe they landed them on a secretive airstrip and killed the passengers and demolished the plane..
ALSO: If those terrorists actually flew the plane into the WTC's, they would have had to been very skilled. It is very hard (without hands-on practice) to fly a plane of that size and hit a target as planned..
|
|
#10
 2006-02-07, 04:01
|
Toxicwboy 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: 9-11
richard S. is an idiot, i watched it and it seems very unlikely.
the vid. i posted seems more likely.
|
|
#11
 2006-02-07, 04:33
|
|
|
Re: 9-11
quote: Originally posted by DKOLeary-AUS: one question: if what the video is telling is true, where did the actual planes go??
i was thinking: maybe they landed them on a secretive airstrip and killed the passengers and demolished the plane..
ALSO: If those terrorists actually flew the plane into the WTC's, they would have had to been very skilled. It is very hard (without hands-on practice) to fly a plane of that size and hit a target as planned..
they took a ton of plane classes and got hands on training. What i found very very very wierd were the explosives while the building was going down
|
|
#12
 2006-02-07, 05:11
|
AxiD 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: 9-11
But what's up with those helicopters dropping off shit at the towers, and minutes later first building came down? Why did building 7 fall? Those choppers were never explained niether by media or the government.
9/11 report suggests that the fire destroyed the towers, but steel building never went down in history of the world because of a fire. It's really hard to admit that American government could even do something like this, but when the facts are in front of me, it's hard to ignore them.
|
|
#13
 2006-02-07, 12:34
|
SHunter 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: 9-11
quote: Originally posted by Toxicwboy: richard S. is an idiot, i watched it and it seems very unlikely.
the vid. i posted seems more likely.
What is unlikely? Both videos provide hard, scientific facts and evidence.
|
|
#14
 2006-02-07, 19:15
|
|
|
Re: 9-11
quote: Originally posted by AxiD: But what's up with those helicopters dropping off shit at the towers, and minutes later first building came down? Why did building 7 fall? Those choppers were never explained niether by media or the government.
9/11 report suggests that the fire destroyed the towers, but steel building never went down in history of the world because of a fire. It's really hard to admit that American government could even do something like this, but when the facts are in front of me, it's hard to ignore them.
Steel doesn't need to melt to be destroyed. It just has to warp enough that it loses its strength. Remember, there were tons of concrete where the planes hit, and that will cause a pancake effect. The reason it took so long was that it held its strength for a little while then lost it and it came crashing down. Why dont these people who claim that the planes never hit the towers talk to the families of the victims. The government would have to shut a ton of people up about it. Which is something the government cant do, just look at Watergate, if they cover-up a break in, then what the fuck can they do?
|
|
#15
 2006-02-07, 20:26
|
Sharko 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: 9-11
http://www.mujahideenryder.net/?postid=34
heres the that same video but below the top one is another version of the same video but 20 minutes longer and alot more interesting info leading up to 911 in the beginning
|
|
#16
 2006-02-07, 20:50
|
Sharko 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: 9-11
quote: Originally posted by vazilizaitsev89: Steel doesn't need to melt to be destroyed. It just has to warp enough that it loses its strength. Remember, there were tons of concrete where the planes hit, and that will cause a pancake effect. The reason it took so long was that it held its strength for a little while then lost it and it came crashing down. Why dont these people who claim that the planes never hit the towers talk to the families of the victims. The government would have to shut a ton of people up about it. Which is something the government cant do, just look at Watergate, if they cover-up a break in, then what the fuck can they do?
dude you dont know what your talking about, seriously, "pancake effect" lol are you kidding me
|
|
#17
 2006-02-07, 23:58
|
|
Regular
|
|
Gold Coast Australia
|
|
Re: 9-11
Just cos them Arabs got a lil bit of flight training and went into a Simulator a few times for that plane, doesnt mean they can steer one perfectly into its target... its not as easy as steering a car into something, everything has to be matched up... altitude, air speed, ground speed, tilt, engine speed(rpms), and other little factors.. that are mastered over time and experience...
|
|
#18
 2006-02-10, 00:26
|
HomerHitter 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: 9-11
That guy contradicts himself SO many times. Also the dumbest part I saw was when it said jet fuel was keroseen. No it isn't you fuckwit. Jet fuel burns much hotter, and although still highly unlikey, and could vaporize those engines. VERY well put together video besides those two things. Google Video search loose change 2nd edition. It's the revamped version of that.
|
|
#19
 2006-02-10, 01:25
|
catbert 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: 9-11
fruit-loops kinda taste good fresh but lose there taste fast :(. oh never mind that was a wweb site talking about the conspiracy theorists saying that 19 invisible arab terrorists did it :)
|
|
#20
 2006-02-10, 05:06
|
fakeithardx 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: 9-11
READ MY BROTHER READ AND WATCH AND LEARN!!!
Your slave masters lie to you every day http://www.question911.com/links.php
every video on 9/11 you could ever desire and some on chemtrails, watch those too. Dont bash it until you fully understand. www.weatherwars.info
read my brothers please
|
|
#21
 2006-02-10, 13:30
|
Xylene 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: 9-11
I just watched it and I really can't say anything but "wow". It makes a lot of sense..
|
|
#22
 2006-02-10, 20:34
|
Sharko 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: 9-11
quote: Originally posted by HomerHitter: That guy contradicts himself SO many times. Also the dumbest part I saw was when it said jet fuel was keroseen. No it isn't you fuckwit. Jet fuel burns much hotter, and although still highly unlikey, and could vaporize those engines. VERY well put together video besides those two things. Google Video search loose change 2nd edition. It's the revamped version of that.
2nd edition is by far better, dont even bother watching the first one if you have a choice. BTW google video rocks, ive found tons of interesting videos, ill make a post soon with some of the good ones
|
|
#23
 2006-02-10, 23:39
|
DoMiNiOn 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: 9-11
Please reply if you know about the demolotion charges as the buildings were falling. Now, I read, if I can recall exactly, that the fire department or some authority planted those demolition charges because the blazing fires were to much for the firefighters. BUT, I don't see that being feasable because on that day everyone was shocked and awed as the buildings were hit that everyone was trying to save lives. ANOTHER point, it was hell in those buildings from the fires, smoke, people, drama, etc that who could have the time to plant those explosives! Lastly, whoever thought that the buildings were going to fall? Fire Department?
AND do you think POSSIBLY that the Pentagon used the holographic missle technology to hide the missle surrounded by an image of an airliner?
One more thing to consider: those flashes? Each plane produced flashes fraction of a second upon hitting the building. Facts don't add up and if our country could do this to us, then who do we 'trust' now?
|
|
#24
 2006-02-11, 19:53
|
SHunter 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: 9-11
^ Not 100% fact, but I read somewhere about a week before the attack the buildings were completely evacuated for one reason or another, leaving plenty of time for them to plant the demolition devices.
Again, I have nothing to back up my claims on this one, but it is interesting if true.
|
|
#25
 2006-02-11, 19:55
|
heavymetal1 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: 9-11
interesting?
|
|
#26
 2006-02-11, 23:50
|
DoMiNiOn 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: 9-11
If the buildings were really evacuated and there were really explosives planted, then that in itself is a government conspiracy. Just give it time, everything will unfold and collapse.
|
|
#27
 2006-02-12, 02:56
|
|
|
Re: 9-11
quote: Originally posted by Sharko: 2nd edition is by far better, dont even bother watching the first one if you have a choice. BTW google video rocks, ive found tons of interesting videos, ill make a post soon with some of the good ones
If this guy is right, then why bother producing a second edition.
|
|
#28
 2006-03-06, 00:04
|
Rehab is Fun 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: 9-11
damn, thats a long ass video i got better things to do.... ok well maybe not
|
|
#29
 2006-03-06, 04:00
|
|
|
Re: 9-11
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html
Done.
|
|
#30
 2006-03-08, 16:27
|
im_bigger_then_god_see 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: 9-11
fuck this shit
|
|
#31
 2006-03-09, 04:29
|
laar 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: 9-11
i read that the explosions where"jet fule running down the elevator shafts and igniting" don't know how true it is but thats what I read.
|
|
#32
 2006-03-09, 05:15
|
TerminatorVinitiatoR 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: 9-11
holographic missile technology?!?!?! wtf, are you on crack?
*googles holographic missile technology*
|
|
#33
 2006-03-13, 07:22
|
Toxicwboy 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: 9-11
First, I would like to say yes jet fuel is based off of kerosene. Google before you speak nimrod.
|
|
#34
 2006-03-14, 04:16
|
Cybernetico 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: 9-11
I love to see just how much this is taking off, and how popular this opinion has become. A year ago I'd see this all over this place and nobody really listened, now it's actually getting some attention.
It's hard to swallow, but as you keep thinking about it as you see events unfolding, and you look at the facts, it becomes undeniable.
|
|
#35
 2006-03-14, 05:52
|
lacker 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: 9-11
I don't know what the fuck is going on in our World anymore.
I voted for Bush and now Im seeing all the republicans turning their backs to this man.
Face it, Suddam Husain had to be removed.
Bushes mistake was not going to war with Iraq but rather his excuse of using WMD's as the source of reasoning. I kept yelling at my TV screen everytime he and his cabinet used that as the reason of choice.
If I was Bush, i would have simply replied that Mr Suddam violated a peace accord signed in 1991. He violated it 12 or more times over the 9 years (3 years ago) and that should have warrented an airstike on him and his little buddies.
We did not need to storm iraq with all of those ground troups. Simply, we would bomb his palaces. Wait a few weeks and allow intelligence to tell us where he was located and then keep bombing those sites until we took the fucker out. It would not violate the agreement between nations that a sitting leader can not be assinated because He already commited an act of war by firing on UN jets in the "No Fly Zone".
By creating a story that suddam had WMDs was the biggest mistake of all. And to be honest, He might actually have biological and chemical weapons stashed somewhere. Perhaps in iran or afghanistan.
|
|
#36
 2006-03-14, 05:54
|
lacker 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: 9-11
PS.. You people should support our troups. half those guys are pissed off at Bush and all the politicians far more then you ever could. Support and pray for their safe return.
|
|
 |
 |
To the best of our knowledge, the text on this page may be freely reproduced and distributed.

totse.com certificate signatures
|
 |
 |
About | Community | Bad Ideas | Drugs | Ego | Erotica | Fringe | Society | Technology
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|