here i am, lookin at all the stupid kids in the other forums and all i can think is "just dont do it".

do me a favor and iffin you ever decide to xill someone, do it with a rock or something. i like havin the ability to own firearms and i know that if these phucktards keep xillin eachother with em, then the government will eventually take mah toys away.

do me a favor and iffin you decide to xill someone, do it with a rock or something...(what are they gonna do, register rocks)

just phor phucks sake, just dont do it with a gun

bah the way,.....i'm drunk.(that doesnt mean thets its not a good point)

there was a small but not stupid one till you called it a toy.

[This message has been edited by Alan Smithee (edited 01-04-2002).]

i refer to it as a toy because all i use em phor anymore is phun. i could use one to protect mahself but it would be in the same sence that i would use a baseball bat(toy).
even toys can give you the edge when you need it.

You can use them for recreational pourposes such as hunting and target practice. however the informal aspect of a toy should never be applied to a firearm.

i understand what your sayin and perhaps your right. still, anything i use phor phun falls in mah "toy" catagory

also correct spelling is more condusive to a persuasive arguement.

who said that i was arguing. i have no arguement...just a statement that i felt a need(in mah drunkin state)to post. and while i still feel strongly about it, i dont expect people who cant decypher mah zpelling to know what it all means. im glad you know what i meant, but the fact that you are the only one who reposted, shows me that there are very few who care.

Yeah dont go shooting people. there was one mass shooting here and they took away all semi auto and pump action guns. there also harder to get.

A pox on you Phacktal.
Is Sarah Mclachlan going to kill you with a rock?

Deliberate mispelling makes you look much cooler than the rest of us.

*bows to phracktal*

I ph33r you.

quote:

---

Originally posted by Deviant:
A pox on you Phacktal.
Is Sarah Mclachlan going to kill you with a rock?

---

lmao

i use to remeber a dick who use to think pipebombs are just as powerful as hth bombs "fuck these kids piss me off" anyway the last time i saw in with legs was when every told ta i laugh that thing blows your fucken face away and blah blah blah and so some people followed i didn't i was to lazy
when boom and they came running out with him with no legs hahhahahahaha and the next stupid fucker who is going to do something as stupid as that will be
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.phracktal

good point phracktal anyone who uses something like a gun or bomb is a narc or llama as we say today. if i were to do it i would use a virus and spread it across the whole school. maybe i would be smart enough to culture my own virus or mutate a common virus like hepititus. would they call me a llama or would they call me original, exceptionally smart for culturing my own virus, you tell me.

quote:

---

Originally posted by phracktal:
then the government will eventually take mah toys away.

bah the way,.....i'm drunk.(that doesnt mean thets its not a good point)

---

I don't ever see the day that the government will make law abiding civilians give up their guns. I know and have spoken to many law enforcement officers and they would quit their occupation before going door to door "hello there do you have any firearms in your residence that needs to be surrendered?"

Besides. Look at the 1994 Crime Bill that was passed by lol clinton. What has it done to subdue crime? Nope except limiting all post 1994 firearms that are produced or imported into the United States to a maxium capacity of ten rounds per magazine? lol

This bill is due to sunset on 2004. From what I can see it will. I will be praying for it's demise.

Unless we get another democrat in office... then all bets are off. :-/

ALAN,

With the massive ammount of money that I have invested into my collection of fine firearms I will refer to them as "toy" if I so choose to.

Or maybe how the liberals will coin them, "Destructive devices" which I haven't seen in text excluding a Class III/NFA firearm from my last form four.

After all why spend all that $$$ on something that doesn't bring you joy and happiness?

Pardon,

But, If you kill someone with a rock won't you get into a lot more trouble with the law then if you use a gun?

Seeing how they would class it as a more brutal act?

Plus lets say all you did was throw a rock at the attacker and it hit him right and killed him and it happened to make it in the papers wouldn't it read something like
(Man beats another man to death with a rock)
It just doesn't sound very good
they make it sound barbaric and it usually doesn't sound very good in court.

VatoDave,

lol it all depends on what state you live in.

Califnoria you probabaly wouldn't stand a chance (excluding O.J SIMSPON of course).

yall in australia, why dont u make boomegangs with a one sided razor blade??
or havent u guys figured out a safe way to catch it? or is it only in movies that boomerangs come back? ( dont blame my boomerang ingnorence, i havent trown one in my entiere life! )