You guys remember that black guy before the civil war and the supreme court ruled that basically you could bring slaves anywhere couldnt the same verdict be made on handguns and bringing them anywhere. Thanks

Non Gratum Anus Rodentum

The Dred Scott ruling was that the slave, Dred Scott, was property. Not a man. That even if he were in a state where slavery was illegal he was still a slave and property. It has nothing to do with handguns, at all.

wow, i almost see the deranged logic in it. Dred Scot was another mans property and even when his owner brought him north where he slavery was illegal, he was still the mans property. If one was from a country where crack was legal, couldnt he just as soon smoke it here if he brought it with him?
Diplomatic immunity! goddamnit...

i actualy think the case had to do with the fact that Dredd Scott had run north and his owner wanted him back but whatever.

right dred scott ran north but he was still considered property. It was like that till they reached canada or mexico.