sad that i use 98se i know but i'm still looking for:
a decent port scanner and packet sniffer and tcp-transmitter.

anyone got any idea?

quote:

---

Originally posted by skalez:
sad that i use 98se i know ...

---

That is not sad at all, the sad thing is that you are using other people's programs to do your work, what is even sadder is that you are doing such work in the first place.
Did you even try a search engine? Why would we help you hack anyway?

quote:

---

Originally posted by skalez:
... and tcp-transmitter.

---

what for?

Here is a link with most of the stuff you want, but just to make it tough on you, it's in french.
http://www.gratuiciel.com/freeware/pc/i3.htm

Use google.com and type in:

+"port scanner" +Windows -linux

and

+"packet sniffer" +Windows -linux

and

+"packet builder" +Windows -linux

or variants of those searches (keep in mind I have not tried them in that exact form). If you can't search on google yourself, then you are too stupid to even use those programs.

Rafale - packet builder
Ethereal - packet sniffer
GFI LanGuard - multi tool port scanner + other stuff.

NOW BE GONE! hehe

[This message has been edited by cense (edited 08-14-2002).]

nmap is ported to windows.

quote:

---

That is not sad at all, the sad thing is that you are using other people's programs to do your work, what is even sadder is that you are doing such work in the first place.
Did you even try a search engine? Why would we help you hack anyway?

---

Down boy! Seriously, chill out.

First off, he hasn't asked how to crack anything, and there's no indication that he plans to do anything nasty. Secondly, a portscanner is just a tool. There is absolutely nothing wrong with using a tool that someone else crafted. It's not some hack-in-a-box like subseven. What if I said that you couldn't use netcat?

then i would say who cares? nc isnt the end all be all of security. its convenient since it can perform most basic networking tasks but its not the only tool. i personally dont use netcat and i get along just fine. i prefer to use multiple specialized tools rather than netcat.

and another thing, there is nothing wrong with using windows. i think windows is way better than linux for footprinting and enumerating. there are way more quality scanners and netbios crackers for windows than linux or unix. plus some people may flame me for this but i do apreciate the ease of use in many GUI scanners.

try using tools like sam spade and GFI langaurd scanner and tell me windows is useless. not only is it on par with linux in the tool arena but i thin it is better for some tasks.

as for the original question, what makes you think you can competently use these tools if you cant even find them? its like people who ask how to get IP's. if you cant get that then you surely cant hack anything

I believe its all a matter of preference syphon. If you like windows then use it. If you like linux, same goes, use it. As long as you can do what you want in a fashion that allows you to be productive.

I found some very awesome netbios scanners for linux. One in particular that is command line based. It would scan your subnet and automaticaly mount all open shares. Thats pretty sweet.

Also, don't forget many of the "tools" for windows are simply built upon ports of the unix/linux tools and libraries. Many programs are now being built on libpcap and libnet ported libraries, although, a given, more are built on winsock API calls.

All I really want to say is its preferrence and I'll just argue that linux is far more capable than windows for many "hacking" tasks.

[This message has been edited by cense (edited 08-15-2002).]

for linux: ke

or Tkined

then: forget languard.

jeez, no need to have a phish. the reason i use 98 is because no games run on linux (or very few, i know that there is a quake for linux). i know that for what i like doing linux/unix is far superior, but i can't be screwed dual-booting when i KNOW it is possible to do on windows. as for why- i want to learn! no hacking, just plain learning. plus if i knew how to, i would have simply written my own tool, rather than making a lot of people irate about the whole affair. i have looked, seriously, but i (so far) haven't found anything worthy of my attention. hopefully this will change with your help

plus, another reason i don't write my own is i have squat-all time to write it

the reason for the abundance of tools for windows is because of the abundance of users of windows, and the ease of everything (in general) on windows. i believe that windows what windows gains in user-friendlyness it loses in power and stability, and also on the latest incarnations of windows (which i hate to buggery) the user friendly part yakes over and makes the whole experience rather threatening to your open minded computer nerd. personally, i would prefer to use linux if i didn't play games

assembly is cool

several final notes:

it doesn't matter what os it is, even if it's microsoft, a lot of hard work has gone into them, and they're better than anything me or you alone could concoct in one night.

my computer sounds like it has a frog in it. perhaps i should check.

if consequences dictate
my course of action then it
it doesn't matter what's right
it's only wrong if you get caught
if consequences dictate
my course of action then i
i should play god and just
SHOOT YOU MYSELF!!!!!!!

(recognise the quote anyone?)

Tool - Jerk Off (off of Opiate)

months ago i stated netboy a multi internet analyse suite i use personalu to pick up packets since i was trying to analyse the
winmx peer 2 peer application protocol
i highly recomand it

quote:

---

Originally posted by skalez:
assembly is cool :D

---

so?

well first off windows is by no means not powerfull but the politics of software and API's hold it back from being all it can be. second of the stability is not an issue when comparing to linux. windows 2k is more stable than linux with x and a WM for desktop use. however linux is far more stable in the server enviorment if you use no GUI. stability is a non issue now with windows since we have 2k.

personally i do prefer linux but windows still has it place, just not in my cost account. if i get it for free ill use it, otherwise forget it because its not worth the money they want.

the true strength of linux is its freedom and greater user controll. the politics of GNU versus M$ proprietary licenses is enough to make me prefer linux and use as much as possible. even if window swas the most wonderfull OS ever made and beat linux in every aspect i would still not use it exclusivly or ever pay for it because i have a moral problem with their policies. i know at this point im off topic and ranting so ill just end it here....

true, true and true.
and yes, we are ranting, but isn't it such good fun?

my point was that i use 98, when clearly if you want to use windows you should use 2000

but who cares anymore anyway

quote:

---

Originally posted by skalez:
assembly is cool

---

Visual Basic is better

quote:

---

Visual Basic is better

---

OH GOD NO! Please tell me you're joking. I'm pretty sure you are, but please remove any doubt from my mind. Visual Basic is the hell-bound offspring of that bitch Windows...

gnool, i'm not even going to dignify that with a response

yes, he's joking, trust me, he knows that assembly owns, just he refuses to admit it. a while ago when i still used c/c++ (dreadful language, assembly is easier in my opinion) we always used to argue over which is better.

but one day i forced him to send me a poor vb prog, and i disassembled it. it was just a whole tone of data and a dll call or 2! how poor

kind of off the original topic a bit, hey? maybe we should start a new post

[This message has been edited by skalez (edited 08-20-2002).]

Heh heh, of course I'm joking . It's all I can be bothered programming in though.