About
Community
Bad Ideas
Drugs
Ego
Erotica
Fringe
Society
Technology
register | bbs | search | rss | faq | about
meet up | add to del.icio.us | digg it
Go Back   Community > Society > Conspiracy!
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Conspiracy! This forum is about the unexplained, whether it's political hidden agendas, secret societies, clandestine operations, alien life, political assasinations, CIA trickery, Masonic sub-plots, and other bits of Truth.

View Poll Results: What do you believe?
The U.S. carried out the attacks. 97 32.88%
The U.S. knew before hand but did not carry out the attacks. 104 35.25%
The U.S. did not know and did not carry out the attacks. 81 27.46%
Other (Please elaborate) 13 4.41%
Voters: 295. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 #1 
Old 2002-07-14, 16:41
kingenrage kingenrage is offline
Regular
 
Default Nature of life.

This is all the proof one needs to be sure that there is life on an another planet.
Earth was lifeless, Until a meteor came into earth's range and landed on its surface. Exept that was no normal space rock, It had living life cells. That means that there is another form of life in the universe, because that living cell came from space.
Unless you wanna belive the old Adam&EVe&GOd theory I invite you to share feelings on mine.
 #2 
Old 2002-07-14, 18:47
Bongman Bongman is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Nature of life.

The earth being seeded by a meteor is one theory. It's also possible that spontaneous generation occured from non-living materials.

When people talk of the life giving meteor it's usually assumed that the rock came from somewhere in our solar system. That Mars seeded Earth or Earth seeded Mars.
 #3 
Old 2002-07-14, 19:39
kingenrage kingenrage is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Nature of life.

Ok. Maybe it Happend from the bond Of two non living materials, But why didnt It happen Before? MAybe because something was missing, ANd the missing thing came from else where.

I ask Another question: What came first Hydrogen or water?

If there was no hydrogen there would be no water, But with no water where would the hydrogen come from?
 #4 
Old 2002-07-14, 21:43
Nox Nox is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Nature of life.

King,

The hydrogen came first a la the big bang. Subsequent fusion formed helium et al...up to iron. Above iron, current theory is that these elements were formed as a result of super nova explosions.

Nox
 #5 
Old 2002-07-15, 01:55
CuriousMonky CuriousMonky is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Nature of life.

Question is.. what caused these explosions? And how did they occur?
 #6 
Old 2002-07-15, 02:58
kingenrage kingenrage is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Nature of life.

Thats questions had no purpouse,
Only to show that water "simplified" produced
Hydrogen & oxigen. Oxigen wich Is the main reason of life on EArth, But IT couldnt have been here all the time. And if IT came from the big bang means thats somewhere else out there there's more Of it.
Coming to the conclusion of : if there's oxigen here there must be elsewhere.
 #7 
Old 2002-07-15, 05:30
Nox Nox is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Nature of life.

King,

You lost me on that one.

Nox
 #8 
Old 2002-07-15, 17:17
kingenrage kingenrage is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Nature of life.

I lost The Ob'noX'ous You, SOrry, not done intentionly.

Ill try again: If water here is made out of to things that we have in abondence why shouldn't it be elsewhere. Because to think of it things dont just aprear out of the blue.
Or In this case they did because they came from the sky. And in order to Have things falling from space there has to be things in space. ( im sorry if your lost by now ) Water/oxigen/...ect didn't apear out of nowhere. It came from somewhere where there were ( and maybe still are ) those elements.

 #9 
Old 2002-07-15, 18:47
Nox Nox is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Nature of life.

And all of those materials were here on earth. O yes space debris adds innumeral tons of mass each year, but the fundamental chemicals were already here.

Now the theory of transplanted life is an old one. That's why that meteorite found in Antarctica was so important. It's overall composition classified it as originating on Mars. The tubelike occlusions were identified by some as appearing to resemble tubes made by bacteria. That debate continues.

Do other planets contain the same mix/ratio of elements as ours? The odds of there being other "Class M" (to quote Star Trek) planets is quite favorable.

obNOXious

 #10 
Old 2002-07-15, 20:16
kingenrage kingenrage is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Nature of life.

HOw can U say that all those materials were always here?
That Would mean that life was always around also. BUt that isnt the case, everything came from somewhere else.

I have a question for wich I won't accept an anwser. ( aprouve the anwser )
What caused the matter inside the earth to light up and burn?
My theorie is that a meteorite came with an "unknown" matter and caused the reaction wich multiplied and gave birth to all the things we have now.
The ice age. no life rigth? MEteorite comes and gets planet back into life.
All makes sence ( if only not the lazy spelling )
 #11 
Old 2002-07-16, 02:33
Bongman Bongman is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Nature of life.

Life did not die out during the ice age. And you're theory just leads to the question of where did the meteorite come from?
 #12 
Old 2002-07-17, 02:21
kingenrage kingenrage is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Nature of life.

It also birngs the Anwser: From An other place with life.
 #13 
Old 2002-07-18, 23:40
ChibiMiko ChibiMiko is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Nature of life.

in your thoery most likly some form of static shock caused it....and most likly it was in space with some fucked up exploding star

-Chibi

-THE MAN!
 #14 
Old 2002-07-19, 01:22
kingenrage kingenrage is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Nature of life.

I doubt that life could come from a star ( wich May I remind u is really hot ) and even less probable that it came from the explosion of a star.
I wish I could agree to a part of ur post, but its all wrong because I doubt that a static shock started life
 #15 
Old 2002-07-20, 02:51
CuriousMonky CuriousMonky is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Nature of life.

And still my questions go unanswered.
 #16 
Old 2002-07-20, 19:27
kingenrage kingenrage is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Nature of life.

Monkey, MAybe the star in question ran out of the matter that kept the shit stabilized, how did it occur? I have no fuckin clue about that.
 #17 
Old 2002-07-20, 22:52
Nox Nox is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Nature of life.

quote:
Originally posted by CuriousMonky:
And still my questions go unanswered.


I'm not sure which questions you are refering to.

Big Bang- My question as well.

Supernova- has to do with the gravity of mass vs the internal pressure of the excess energy from the fusion process within the star.

Nox
 #18 
Old 2002-08-03, 16:07
Genital-Warfare Genital-Warfare is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Nature of life.

Those elements have been here since earth has formed otherwise their would be nothing to make the earth. Now for the big bang, if it is what created everything than what made it it had to have had something before it? how does nothing explode ?
 #19 
Old 2002-08-03, 16:28
Global Dominator Global Dominator is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Nature of life.

quote:
Originally posted by kingenrage:
I doubt that life could come from a star ( wich May I remind u is really hot ) and even less probable that it came from the explosion of a star.
I wish I could agree to a part of ur post, but its all wrong because I doubt that a static shock started life



They have found worms that live at the bottom of the oceans (under incredible tons of pressure) while eating methane hydrites (solidified frozen methane) or something that lives on the hydrites, also crabs and tube worms and small fish that live in and around sulfur vents on the bottom of oceans (hundreds if not thousands of degrees), not to mention other things that live under the sediment at the bottom of the oceans.

There are fish that live in volcanic pools of water, plants that only need air to survive, bacteria that can live in the acid in your stomach, and other things that live without air, water, light, and damn little evidence of how it is that they survive. But they do.

And because its a little hot on the surface of a star (10,000 degrees for Sol), you think nothing can live there? We know more about the surface of the moon than we do about the floor of the oceans, and we know shit about anything outside the solar system.

 
To the best of our knowledge, the text on this page may be freely reproduced and distributed.
 

totse.com certificate signatures
 
 
About | Community | Bad Ideas | Drugs | Ego | Erotica | Fringe | Society | Technology
Hot Topics