|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
register |
bbs |
search |
rss |
faq |
about
|
 |
 |
meet up |
add to del.icio.us |
digg it
|
 |
 |
| I Am The Law! Car accidents, personal injury, defamation, libel, malpractice, fraud, bankruptcy, debt, lawyers, corporate law, criminal law, jail, police conduct, prison, employment laws, workers compensation, real estate law, divorce and family court, taxes, education, immigration, military law, insurance, trademarks and copyrights, traffic and driving laws, class action law suits, and more. All of these are welcome topics in this forum.This forum is not intended to be a substitute for professional legal advice. Always seek the advice of professional with any questions you may have regarding a legal situation. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read on any web site, including this one. Fair warning: If you're stupid enough to post a confession it could be held against you in a court of law. |
|
#1
 2008-11-04, 20:22
|
|
Regular
|
|
Staten Island New York (Ugh)
|
|
I think I figured out a way to circumvent the federal subversion of public rights.
Local elections. We need to start voting in them, and electing people who will stand up for the people over the requests of Washington.
If we all payed attention and voted in state/city/town elections I don't think the country's problems would all be solved, but we'd all at least have a somewhat fair voice.
Thats my 2 cents, how about yours?
|
|
#2
 2008-11-04, 22:18
|
|
|
Re: I think I figured out a way to circumvent the federal subversion of public rights.
I think the main reason individual towns, cities, local governments etc. don't have any true sovereignty from federal government, is that constituents are intentionally distracted from actual issues and problems, and instead made to concentrate on petty affairs.
For example, where I'm living right now, mayoral candidates use labels and empty rhetoric ("a true patriot with the conservative values we cherish" shit like this) and never bother to discuss facts or numbers or historical precedents. And no one seems to expect any better than that, because they don't know any different.
So, they elect representatives who run on these meaningless platforms, and who otherwise conform to whatever the higher-ups tell them to conform to.
This is just where I live, though. There are many exceptions.
But I agree with your post. People just need to be less ignorant/gullible/divided.
I think our generation is going to do a better job in that aspect than past generations, simply because we have immediate access to unbridled information sources.
This fucking thing isn't letting me indent paragraphs, so I'm spacing.
|
|
#3
 2008-11-07, 22:00
|
|
Regular
|
|
Staten Island New York (Ugh)
|
|
Re: I think I figured out a way to circumvent the federal subversion of public rights.
Republic, I like the way you think, but I dont completely agree with you on the whole decrease in ignorance due to the internet thing. Check out something called net neutrality and you'll know why.
No one else has something to say about this?
|
|
#4
 2008-11-08, 21:07
|
|
|
Re: I think I figured out a way to circumvent the federal subversion of public rights.
I'm familiar with net neutrality issues.
Obviously, my belief that the internet will foster a more enlightened electorate is based on the assumption that people will be able to access the information they want freely and without hinderance.
And, unfortunately, I have very little confidence in the upcoming administration's ability to solve these issues practically.
I would also like to hear what others think about the original question, though.
|
|
 |
 |
To the best of our knowledge, the text on this page may be freely reproduced and distributed.

totse.com certificate signatures
|
 |
 |
About | Community | Bad Ideas | Drugs | Ego | Erotica | Fringe | Society | Technology
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|