I think it makes sense for them to always vote for a republican like McCain or Bush, because as Barry Cooper pointed out, we're letting pedophiles out of prison at alarming rates to make room for drug offenders, and the republicans created the 'war on drugs'...

There's also this http://www.armchairsubversive.org/

I was talking to my friend who is a republican, and happens to also be a racist alcoholic pedophile, and he keeps saying there's going to be a civil war. He said he saw a bumper sticker with "If Obama wins, civil war is imminent" on it. He also told me, "democrats don't have guns" and that they'd be getting their guns and "heading for the hills".


So I said, "last time we had a civil war, which was about race, southerners wanting to keep slaves, and notherners being against that, the slave owners didn't win, so I don't know if guns will do you much good since you had them before and still lost.."

Then he said something like "And now we have nukes"

So he told me the war wasn't very much about slavery and went on to tell me what it was mainly about.


And my own conclusion with all this is, violent redneck pedophiles are typical McCain supporters. But what about the more intelligent pedophiles? I'm not sure who they'll vote for.

Civil war was about state's rights...

Mainly, in my opinion, their right to keep slaves. Well, that's always how everyone made it seem. This is not about that though. I want to know who the intelligent pedophiles would vote for mostly, but also the less intelligent ones. The majority of them. My pedo friend said the exact same thing you said, but I do think it was mainly about their right to keep slaves, and that obviously shouldn't be anyone's right.

Mainly, in my opinion, their right to keep slaves. Well, that's always how everyone made it seem. This is not about that though. I want to know who the intelligent pedophiles would vote for mostly, but also the less intelligent ones. The majority of them.

I would tink that they would vote primarilly for democratic candidates becuase the really leftist ones will be more sympathetic to them and are more likely to hamper criminal investigative efforts. If not, Republican candidates sure as hell will make their lives alot harder since they will make criminal investigations more streamlined, as we see happening today with terrorism suspects.

(The Civil war was also about unfair taxation and whatnot. ;))

I would tink that they would vote primarilly for democratic candidates
That's what my friend said too but I can't really agree.


If not, Republican candidates sure as hell will make their lives alot harder since they will make criminal investigations more streamlined

When I read up on it, I found the opposite to be true. Can never known for sure though.


(The Civil war was also about unfair taxation and whatnot. ;))

Yeah, we went over that too but I'm always going to have to think it was mainly about their keeping of slaves.

One problem is probably the fact that politics is always filled with scumbags and less decent people than scumbags enter politics.

When I read up on it, I found the opposite to be true.

I don't see how this can possibly be true, considering how the current Republican witch hunts center around pedophiles and terrorists. You could just about get a bill passed through Congress declaring Bush to be King of America if it had a provision to hang pedophiles right after their verdicts, and you get immoliated if you happen to be a terrorist who likes the kiddies.

Libertarians, since its the party of "mind your business"

But Bob Barr is their candidate and he is not a Libertarian. Sad, sad day.

I love the manner in which you throw all pedophiles in a category. Obviously Pedophiles don't have the crashing economy on their mind, the war in Iraq, im gonna stop naming issues cuz there are so many.

Thats ludacris to group them together.

Thats like saying "hey I wonder who DUI offenders are voting for" or "I wonder who shoplifters are voting for" or "I wonder who people that commited mail-fraud are voting for"

come on dude

Obviously Pedophiles don't have the crashing economy on their mind, the war in Iraq, im gonna stop naming issues cuz there are so many.



So you think because they're pedophiles, they don't care about these things.. I can't exactly take you seriously now. You'll have to scroll up to find bitch and moan.

So you think because they're pedophiles, they don't care about these things.. I can't exactly take you seriously now. You'll have to scroll up to find bitch and moan.

its called sarcasm bro. Im showing how ridicoulas the OP's statement is.

its called sarcasm bro. Im showing how ridicoulas the OP's statement is.

You should review the defintion of sarcasm, because what you were using was not sarcasm, it was just idiocy and whiny gayness. I'm just going to ignore you from now on, you're pointless.

lol @ last few posts.

They sure are hard on child rapists these days I guess Argon was right.

http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=20177025&BRD=1160&PAG=461&dept_id=190958&rfi=6

http://www.wbir.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=66584&provider=top

thats right everybody, its about time somebody took up arms against those cheeky bleeding heart interventionist bastards in the government in defense of big pedophilia.

no group votes for the same person at all times because there are just so many other topics that person may argree/disagree with either the Democrats or Republicans ( im only including those two because no independant has ever won). Some people are huge Pro-life people and will vote republican for that even if they don't nessisarily agree with the majority of the postitions.

He's saying if someone held their pedoness at the top of their political agenda then who would they most likely vote for.

I would say republicans because they support the death-penalty. They would rather die by lethal injection than by rapped and beaten to death in prison by an inmate or a guard...

The civil war was for establishing legal grounds that a business corporation is legally a person.

You should review the defintion of sarcasm, because what you were using was not sarcasm, it was just idiocy and whiny gayness. I'm just going to ignore you from now on, you're pointless.

Actually it was sarcasm, you're just too full of idiocy and whiny gayness to realize.

Oh and the civil war was not all about slavery.

"It is a fact that when the armies for the North and South were first formed, only a small minority of the soldiers on either side would have declared that the reason they joined the army was to fight either "for" or "against" slavery."

http://www.greatamericanhistory.net/causes.htm

Op is a felching idiot.

Yes it was sarcasm. It was blatantly obvious it was sarcasm and it went over your head by a mile.

Do you have any evidence to support your assertion that the civil war wasn't about slavery? You sound like a complete moron. "Yeah, I've head about that but I decided that's not the case."

Your entire argument revolves around your qualifications to come to that conclusion and your credibility.

You've offered no credentials to lend credibility to your opinion. Not only that, but your reasoning behind indifference towards a civil war is mindbogglingly infantile. "We did it before we can do it again."

(Never mind that the Blue states that would represent the North this time are isolated, disarmed, welfare states that use the federal government & taxes to prop up their failing economies.)

You're obviously wrong to anyone who has researched the civil war beyond the big government propaganda they teach in public school.

You go from just being wrong, to being pretentiously dismissive & wrong.

It's a dumb question, because it obviously would depend on the individual.

Actually it was sarcasm, you're just too full of idiocy and whiny gayness to realize.

Oh and the civil war was not all about slavery.

"It is a fact that when the armies for the North and South were first formed, only a small minority of the soldiers on either side would have declared that the reason they joined the army was to fight either "for" or "against" slavery."

http://www.greatamericanhistory.net/causes.htm

Op is a felching idiot.

Yes it was sarcasm. It was blatantly obvious it was sarcasm and it went over your head by a mile.

Do you have any evidence to support your assertion that the civil war wasn't about slavery? You sound like a complete moron. "Yeah, I've head about that but I decided that's not the case."

Your entire argument revolves around your qualifications to come to that conclusion and your credibility.

You've offered no credentials to lend credibility to your opinion. Not only that, but your reasoning behind indifference towards a civil war is mindbogglingly infantile. "We did it before we can do it again."

(Never mind that the Blue states that would represent the North this time are isolated, disarmed, welfare states that use the federal government & taxes to prop up their failing economies.)

You're obviously wrong to anyone who has researched the civil war beyond the big government propaganda they teach in public school.

You go from just being wrong, to being pretentiously dismissive & wrong.

Implying that those issues would influence their decision when I'm already asking who they would choose according to their pedophilia, is idiotic. IamCancer is the only one that was able to stay on topic and understand the question. It was pretty obvious, when someone would ask "who would pedos vote for" they're not talking about the ones that care more about issues which aren't in the interests of the pedo agenda. So this isn't about the economy or any of those other issues, and that's why droppinds attempt at sarcasm was a failure.

droppinds types like a semi coherent, paste eating 10 year old. So everything he says will be ignored along with the other three idiots here that fail to understand the question.


It's a dumb question, because it obviously would depend on the individual.

No, idiot, we're not talking about individuals. We're talking about the pedos that vote according to who would best serve their pro-pedo agenda. I made a good point in saying it would be republicans. I explained why I think it would be republicans. But you're on the ignore list now, along with the other off-topic retards.

The question is also not situational. It's who would the majority vote for, not particularly in this election. Any election. And I explained why republicans would be their best choice if they want less harsh sentences.

EDIT, and?

don't think there are enough pedophiles in the country to swing the election in one direction or another. Also not sure why OP thinks that all pedophiles are republican(because a few republicans turned out to be pedo??).

I always knew the Civil War was more about taxation than slavery although that's how it gets portrayed by the media.