|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
register |
bbs |
search |
rss |
faq |
about
|
 |
 |
meet up |
add to del.icio.us |
digg it
|
 |
 |
| Sex and Affection Anything and everything about sex and relations. Please try to keep this forum on-topic, since things tend to wander a bit. Search through old topics before posting a new one, as questions get repeated a lot here. |
 |
|
# 1

2008-10-16, 23:26
|
|
|
A lesson for the youngsters:
No, this isn't CP...
http://preview.tinyurl.com/3wyfke
I'm not even old, yet I'm old enough for it to be illegal. In retrospect, in High School I was SURROUNDED by hot, nubile, insecure, and generally horny chicks. Yet I was too shy/stupid/awkward/many other things to pursue the mountains of teen girls that I could fairly easily get with now with my (even pretty limited) experience and knowledge.
You will NEVER be young enough to (legally, and in the US) get with these girls again. Even if you do somehow, the rest of society will call you perverted. So hop on it now. Have a billion horribly superficial relationships. Save the good relationships for later. Don't look at http://preview.tinyurl.com/3wyfke in even as little as 5 or 6 years and have regrets.
|
# 2

2008-10-17, 02:02
|
|
|
Re: A lesson for the youngsters:
For the record you suck at linking.
I do agree though, all you male totseans still in high school I suggest you have as much sex as possible until it's officially illegal once you reach that age. They just want fun and "love" when they're that young. They don't want money yet!
|
# 3

2008-10-17, 02:06
|
|
|
Re: A lesson for the youngsters:
Quote:
Originally Posted by SomeLowLife
For the record you suck at linking.
I do agree though, all you male totseans still in high school I suggest you have as much sex as possible until it's officially illegal once you reach that age. They just want fun and "love" when they're that young. They don't want money yet!
|
 it works for me... What's wrong with it?
|
# 4

2008-10-17, 02:19
|
|
|
Re: A lesson for the youngsters:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cant Quite Tell
 it works for me... What's wrong with it?
|
It's not direct. I wasted at least 1.6 seconds clicking on the second link in there.
Give it back!
|
# 5

2008-10-17, 02:21
|
|
|
Re: A lesson for the youngsters:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cant Quite Tell
I was too shy/stupid/awkward/many other things to pursue
|
KILL.
YOUR.
GOVERNMENT.
KILL.
THE.
POLICE.
It's a perfectly fair and rational response. You can never go back. Ergo, if you missed out on the brief window of opportunity, you should kill the people who stole from your life.
It's only fair. A life.... for a life. 'n if you still need convincing - it's the fucking government, dude. That's reason enough.
Take back what was taken from you. Take back what you'll never get back. Take it... in blood, and in human lives. It's fair.
|
# 6

2008-10-17, 02:40
|
|
|
Re: A lesson for the youngsters:
I hate the goddamn movie, but a good quote from little miss sunshine:
Grandpa: Listen to me, I got no reason to lie to you, don't make the same mistakes I made when I was young. Fuck a lotta women kid, not just one woman, a lotta women.
|
# 7

2008-10-17, 05:12
|
|
|
Re: A lesson for the youngsters:
I agree with this thread man. The window is really really short, don't let it pass you by, fuck as many hot high schoolers as you can.
|
# 8

2008-10-17, 06:02
|
|
|
Re: A lesson for the youngsters:
Here OP, for you: http://www.megavideo.com/?v=OGAENMMN.
You know what's sad is a girl I know just told me that between the ages of fourteen and sixteen she had sex with more girls than she can count (lost track at 70) and that basically that number is so high as opposed to guys just because it's a lot easier to fuck that many girls (says she).
I think college-age kids though can get high school seniors really easily, maybe even juniors, though.
That said, it is kind of institutionally concocted to control peoples sex drives, and inhibit them...apparently the US school system was based off the Prussian school system.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoePedo
KILL.
KILL.
|
So it's the governments fault he was shy & awkward? What because of the brainwashing of the school system and everything...O.o? Or is it because any private place one underageb& can park their car at to have sex is crawling with cops? And isn't it a potential life for a life?
Last edited by kenton; 2008-10-17 at 06:11.
|
# 9

2008-10-17, 06:24
|
|
|
Re: A lesson for the youngsters:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoePedo
KILL.
YOUR.
GOVERNMENT.
KILL.
THE.
POLICE.
It's a perfectly fair and rational response. You can never go back. Ergo, if you missed out on the brief window of opportunity, you should kill the people who stole from your life.
It's only fair. A life.... for a life. 'n if you still need convincing - it's the fucking government, dude. That's reason enough.
Take back what was taken from you. Take back what you'll never get back. Take it... in blood, and in human lives. It's fair.
|
Kill em all.
|
# 10

2008-10-17, 07:35
|
|
|
Re: A lesson for the youngsters:
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenton
So it's the governments fault he was shy & awkward?
|
To a great degree, yes. Any parent who tells their child "fuck 'em while they're still the same age" - or for that matter, even doesn't try to stop them - usually has their children taken by (drum roll) the government and prosecuted for "corrupting the morals of a minor" or "endangering the welfare of."
Furthermore, the government is responsible for the schools, and the rules within them.
Furthermore, the government is responsible for...
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenton
Or is it because any private place one underageb& can park their car at to have sex is crawling with cops?
|
That. And...
http://www.khou.com/news/state/stori....f31234e3.html
That. And...
http://www.unitedliberty.org/article...-next-20-years
That, bitch. WHERE IS YOUR GOD NOW?!?!?!
'n for that matter, it's also responsible for "well, crap, I attained the social maturity and dating competence of a high school boy in college, instead, I guess I'll just go back 'n tap some freshman ass" resulting in b& and v&. They are, in fact, the reason you can never go back, and the reason why your chance at that part of your life was stolen from you forever, rather than "here versus there."
...but they're also, as demonstrated, the very reason you lost that chance when you were living in the very narrow window they "allow"... and then punish you even if if you do it their way.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenton
And isn't it a potential life for a life?
|
I'd argue the opposite; that someone (such as a member of a government) who stole your chance at having a life, often before you were even fucking born, is far, far more deserving - nay, demanding, if we have any moral conscience whatsoever - of death, than the murderer who took a life from someone who had the chance to at least live about the first half of it.
Kill. It is justice.
|
|
#11
 2008-10-17, 08:05
|
Cant Quite Tell 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: A lesson for the youngsters:
Nah. I don't think it's anything sinister. It's just foresight and hindsight n all that. I was never really told to take full advantage of it. I assumed all the girls were ultra confident and would reject me. Little did I know, their confidence was a sham, and I could've had any of them.
|
|
#12
 2008-10-17, 08:48
|
kenton 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: A lesson for the youngsters:
'n for that matter, it's also responsible for "well, crap, I attained the social maturity and dating competence of a high school boy in college, instead, I guess I'll just go back 'n tap some freshman ass"
Hehe, just sayin' that to say it, I'm still in the window of underage opportunity! (yet not very attracted to girls ;( )
...but they're also, as demonstrated, the very reason you lost that chance when you were living in the very narrow window they "allow"... and then punish you even if if you do it their way.
No doubt. I've heard of a few "public nudity" charges in the most nonpublic of places.
I'd argue the opposite; that someone (such as a member of a government) who stole your chance at having a life, often before you were even fucking born, is far, far more deserving - nay, demanding, if we have any moral conscience whatsoever - of death, than the murderer who took a life from someone who had the chance to at least live about the first half of it.
Is JP anti-abortion? Ok, maybe not quite the same, but, I ask questions for clarity not to argue ;) , so, why kill? I mean, you are serious right? I mean, there's a lot of dirt-ass cops and a lot of douchebag, corrupt, politicians, and I'd agree at least some of them deserve to die (especially in the cases you cited), except what happens when you kill? Don't they just get replaced with even more ignorant, self-interested, insane, assholes...so isn't it really the system that needs to change?
|
|
#13
 2008-10-17, 10:14
|
|
|
Re: A lesson for the youngsters:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cant Quite Tell
I hate the goddamn movie, but a good quote from little miss sunshine:
Grandpa: Listen to me, I got no reason to lie to you, don't make the same mistakes I made when I was young. Fuck a lotta women kid, not just one woman, a lotta women.
|
the grandfather and the teen son were the only cool characters in the movie.
"High school... it's just a beauty pagent, you know? Life is just one beauty pagent after another"
well, the quote went something like that.
and as for the rest of the subject: Sure, fucking a bunch of people is a freedom you have. For god's sakes, wear a fucking condom though. Don't wait until something actually happens, like having a kid you can't raise, or herpes on your dick.
|
|
#14
 2008-10-17, 12:43
|
Captain Kirk 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: A lesson for the youngsters:
Link was great, but you do suck at using them.
Anywhoo, them girls are so fine I'd like to cut their heads off and throw them in a Salvation Army collection bin.
Heck, I might even go as far as eating their butts until my stomach is full of their butts.
|
|
#15
 2008-10-17, 15:54
|
|
|
Re: A lesson for the youngsters:
I say we start a riot to end the hypocrisy.
|
|
#16
 2008-10-18, 07:38
|
|
|
Re: A lesson for the youngsters:
Hehe, just sayin' that to say it, I'm still in the window of underage opportunity! (yet not very attracted to girls ;( )
Well... there's always boys!!
Is JP anti-abortion?
Varies wildly by trimester and foetal development, actually.
I'm DEFINATELY against BOTCHED abortion at any trimester, which is far more akin to the issue of forcing someone to live with a life you've destroyed for no fucking reason, rather than rotting peacefully in the ground. ;) If you've lopped all its limbs off and poked out its eyes... fucking finish the job, ffs.
so, why kill? I mean, you are serious right?
Pretty much!
what happens when you kill? Don't they just get replaced with even more ignorant, self-interested, insane, assholes...
Well, that depends a bit at what level you kill at. It's certainly true for killing (most) cops, especially the ones not commiting crimes WITHOUT orders...
Copkilling takes a free-market, supply-and-demand model. There are x people in a given area, period. There are (a * x) people who WANT to be cops, where 1 > a > 0. There are (b * (a * x)) who want to be cops and fit the lowest possible standard for doing so (e.g. "not paraplegic" or somesuch), where 1 > b > 0.
Now... the reasonably-possible budget is z. There exists a number, let us call it n, which also ranges from zero to one, such that n * z is how much you pay them.
Conversely, let us define "e" as "how many you actually employ." Ergo, each individual officer earns an average of (n * z) / e. Makes sense, right?
Now - just to babble on tl;dr'edly, let us create an arbitrary function, f(x), whose process is unspecified, such that a = f((n*z)/e). That's right, we've just hit the free market, bay-bee - if you offer more pay, more people will wants such delicious cake, and if you offer less, well... the cake is not so delicious, so you will have less people who must eats it, no?
Great.
As we see, the defining equation of the police is (b * x * f((n*z)/e)) = e. That is to say, "the number of people who want the job who can fill it is equal to the number of people we need." 'n since the number of cops sought, the maximum possible budget, the population, and the percentage of applicants who are gimps are all equal... that leaves "pay" the only free variable.
...but there's a giant freaking problem with that. See, since n is a modifier bounded between zero and one, n * z can never be higher than z. Ergo, if the solution of (b * x * f((1*z)/e)) < e, the police force is not manned.
...just to give the reader an idea of the mathematics, the linear form of f(x) would be (x/(z/e)) * f, where f stands for "fuckthepolice," and represents the percentage of the population (zero to one) who would deign to work for the police at the maximum attainable pay. Other equations could well involve a curved slope.
As you have now probably realized, elementary-school prealgebra can do a lot more for running economies and creating revolutions than high-school chemistry can do for synthesizing molecules. 'n yes, people with a FUCKLOAD of years of post-graduate work get paid a lot of money by corporations and national security organizations to do... gradeschool pre-algebra.
Kind of a waste, ain't it? I mean, they could just write those big checks to a random fifth-grader, and not keep wasting everyone's time who wants to LEARN and DO stuff instead of this shit. Ah, well... just another reason to kill your government - they made the schools, and the employment laws, which wasted your life.
Back to the point of this exercise... as we've already discussed, the variable "f" in the function f(x) determines the maximum percentage of people - regardless of ability - who would want to be cops at ANY price (while "a" is the percentage who want to be cops at the current price)...
As a percentage (zero to one), f is defined as equal to (f * x) / x. As you may have noticed, that definition is uselessly tautological - it reduces to "f=f." However, every time you kill a cop, f is redefined such that f' = ((f * x) - 1)/(x - 1)! Yes, Virginia... every cop you kill is someone who would voluntarily be a cop. 'n just for a mental picture, if the total population - x - is fifty people, of which half want to be cops... you're dropping f by 1.1% for every cop you kill. ;) 24/49, 23/48, and so on, until 0/25ths of the populace would ever be a cop. ;)
So really, all you have to do is solve for f=0. Let's clean up the mathematix for a sec... calling it f(y) so you don't get confused with "which x is this x?"
(linear mode demand-curve) f(y) = (y/(z/e)) * f
(universal) g(y) = (b * x * y)
So, all you have to do is solve for f=0 to know when there are ZERO cops. 'n you can pretty much ignore everything else...
BUT...
You can solve for f such that g(f(y)) < e, to know when the system is faltering. 'n furthermore, you can solve for various n in terms of ANY mathematical supply-demand pricing model for f(y) to know exactly how much each cop shot is costing the state in its annual budget.
See? Isn't math fun? :D
I'd assume that sleazy politicians are the more rate-limiting quantity, however. If you want to modify this to model killing sleazy politicians, change "b" to "could get elected," "a" to "sleazy with political ambitions," "f" to "sleazy people in general," and replace "n * z" with a variable empirically quantifying "whatever corrupt benefits sleazy poltiticians gain from being sleazy assholes with a government." ;) 'n as a side note, I have a terrible suspicion that g(f(y)) will be greater than e in the current state, which gives the government a buffer of "free play" at which neither n nor g(f(y)):g(f(y)) > e will change for the first few kills.... which means one might have to burn off the surplus before the quantifiable costs (n) kick in, or partial or total collapse (g(f(y)) < e) occurs.
I also like Agent008's proposal. I just don't have any mathematics to model "the cost of a riot to the powerholder," which would probably be represented as a modification on whatever variable n*z gets replaced with in the "sleazy politician" model.
Now, repeat after me kids... math is power - insurrectionary power. ;)
(inb4plrc, lol)
|
|
#17
 2008-10-18, 07:55
|
|
Regular
|
|
East Bay, CA (Bay Area)
|
|
Re: A lesson for the youngsters:
I don't think relationship should be avoided. If you actually find the right girl, it will be great.
However, a relationship isn't what you should be looking for. It's something that, if it happens, can be great. But it really isn't what you should be focusing on.
|
|
#18
 2008-10-19, 05:02
|
kenton 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: A lesson for the youngsters:
Well... there's always boys!!
Hehe...eh...
Cop Killing/Economy Model
Nice model JP, haha pretty fun to think about. I don't think "people willing to be cops" is a fixed variable, as I think even if cops have to work for free there'd still be people out there who would, the closer and closer society gets to anarchy...
What's so bad about a shift in culture to a "higher consciousness", though. I mean, since we have our fancy biological tools, aka psychedelics, I think it'd be easier to recreate the 60's/70's and make a mass cultural change, or something, because it seems no matter what biology someone has psychedelics always inspire a perspective shift against the traditional "cop" mindset. Not to mention, you'd have to kill a lot of cops before win, I think, and I think a lot of it has to do with the paranoid/fear-based society that is today.
I'm still digesting your post though, I'm sure I didn't pick up on a lot of it as high-in-the-sky it seems and frankly eh, digestion is slow...
Oh, but while I have your attention!!!.. I remember you said you dropped out of school based on reading shitloads, and I'm just wondering, if you have any book recommendations or something that lead to that viewpoint...as I'm kind of messing around with the idea of not going to college because I really dig the whole self-sufficiency thing, but I can just see there's a lot in that decision, beliefs about society, beliefs about what is important, and there's a lot behind it, so yeah..
|
|
#19
 2008-10-22, 14:11
|
|
|
Re: A lesson for the youngsters:
I don't think "people willing to be cops" is a fixed variable, as I think even if cops have to work for free there'd still be people out there who would, the closer and closer society gets to anarchy...
So, adjust f(x) to the equation that matches the curve of your projections. See? Mathematics is designed to be versatile.
What's so bad about a shift in culture to a "higher consciousness"
As written, nothing. Politically, you're still faced with the problem that it's already happened, and isn't affecting those holding power.
At least, none of those who hold power who weren't already there before. The few, on the other hand, are probably actually better at it, because instead of being some guy dropping LSD and trying to figure shit out, they can actually hire mobs of the world's chillest people to drop LSD and figure it out, occasionally asking them interesting questions like "how do I appropriately deal with the presence of war while ensuring my own actions are of the path of peace?"
Can you imagine five hundred of the world's chillest elder hippies pondering that questions about their regular hippie festivals for two or three years?
though. I mean, since we have our fancy biological tools, aka psychedelics, I think it'd be easier to recreate the 60's/70's and make a mass cultural change
The techniques of the 60s and 70s were actually independent of psychedelics. It just happens that the two happened to be about identical in character and effect, actually.
I could get into said techniques, but I won't. There's ancient knowledge out there. Trouble is, I'm not exactly sure about to what degree it's not my job to chat about shit, when I'm supposed to keep silent and just use it. Long story, really, but you can talk to ancient hippies or elder faggots or enlightenment-era cult members or inducted alchemists of the last 10,000 years to get not this shit but a bit and a piece of it or somesuch.
Anyways... focus on the positive. I admit I occasionally focus on revolution, and part of that original post was because I was dealing with that embittered "life has passed me by, you can never go back" when (and since) I was about fucking seven or eight years old, dude, and without a secondary sexual orientation. My early childhood experiences have primed me to fucking kill to overturn the civil order of society.
...ever read up on the psychology of orphans in a brutal all-against-all civil war? Ever wonder if maybe the social effects of bias homicides over a non-visible prejudice would in essence make someone a total orphan, regardless of their legal status or disposition?
Yeah. I ain't deny I stand by "it's justice." Evolutionary psychology and biology created a highly specific response to this degree of civil strife in the course of early childhood for a very specific reason, and it did this a long time ago and in response to a very specific reason. No other environment would or can create such stressors, and the effects are homogenized and clear. The complete and malicious self-destruction of the social group or any pretense to civil social order creates a clear response, and it is well adapted to the environment which precipitates.
But, that doesn't neccesarily mean that one shouldn't just up and make a world that doesn't do shit like that. When someone comes along to knock over the sand castle you made because they're too dumb to make something of their own, simply send out the made-in-childhood sociopathic killers whose sole wish to end the pain of their war-torn childhood environment is suicide in getback for the life they were given by these perperatrors.
More or less fifty percent of whom are pretty decent people as long as you're not the person volunteering to create the fairly specific problem which made them what they are today. The rest... we hope the world can soothe those that don't die in the war. Luckily, however, people who think they want to be, literally, absolute evil, for no other reason than that they're really rather stupid and fell for the mistaken belief that it's trendy, tend to flat-out shit themselves when they see what they tend to manage to create. Especially since it's willing to die. 'n they're just toying around with the idea.
Unfortunately, the current - I believe short-term, maybe a hundred years tops, and it hasn't always - government designed mostly to protect people from their own stupidity when and only when it involves to do evil unto another. Without that natural counterbalancing, shit's built up, and the trouble is we're in an age where the next bloody kansas will be nuclear. One percent of the bell curve on six million is 60,000,000. One percent of the populace at the point of that is over half a million. Gambling the chances that a one of that won't snap when you try to kill it is miniscule.
Humanity is fucked if it keeps doing this. 'n frankly, I won't hold back on pushing the button. No argument could allow me in good conscience to forswear this, and neither would any sentient human being. Any tribe goes, humanity goes.
You want to try the peaceful route? That's cool - whatever's quickest. But not only will I not hold back on pushing the button when the time comes, but I'm honestly scared shitless of being blown to bits by the people around me, the entire mad fuckload of them - not that I'd feel a thing, but that it's undesireable - and I cannot in conscience speak a word to ask them so as to request to stop them.
Sooooo... yeah. A less violent, destructive, toxic, prejudicial, and for that matter downright and flat-out war-torn world? Well.... this is the everything story, now you know. Remember, since the last approximate statistic was .125 of the populace, there happen to be 7,500,000 sheepfuckers bloodthirsty to blow you to bits in the course of sterilizing the entire face of the planet in response to you mistreating their people.
A change in consciousness for the betterment of humanity is cool. But for fuck's sake hurry it the fuck up. Damocles' sword is there.
Not to mention, you'd have to kill a lot of cops before win, I think
;) Only with the primitive tactical battle techniques incorporated therein.
HINT : without petroleum-based transportation, cops all huddle up in a little group in a building and don't come out. Serious. ;)
There are lots of other techniques.
I'm still digesting your post though, I'm sure I didn't pick up on a lot of it as high-in-the-sky it seems and frankly eh, digestion is slow...
Lol... prealgebra is a little intense, and easier when you build it on your own than to read...
It's a lot easier than it sounds. The post back there, that is. Honest. Pretty simple at all, really.
Oh, but while I have your attention!!!.. I remember you said you dropped out of school based on reading shitloads
More or less.
and I'm just wondering, if you have any book recommendations or something that lead to that viewpoint...
Unfortunately, it's not a single book, and the viewpoint was an effect that came mostly after the fact that the books produced.
Anything from the 1600s to the 1800s is pretty good. Usually speaking, at least. Sciences are pretty neat. Especially reading the history of the sciences firsthand, through the original books, in continuity. You really get a feeling for the whole thing... and some of the philosophy that created science in the first place.
|
|
#20
 2008-10-22, 14:13
|
|
|
Re: A lesson for the youngsters:
as I'm kind of messing around with the idea of not going to college because I really dig the whole self-sufficiency thing, but I can just see there's a lot in that decision
As you said... there's a lot in that decision. ;) However, if you do this, through your college fund (or whatever excuse, even if it ain't worth tuition in a single semester) in a decent account and suck of the interest, no matter how puny it is. Being able to sublet a single room even if it's in a crappy part of town and being able to live of the rest with whatever total-self-sufficiency remains to assist is a useful ability when you're between-jobs/investments-which-are-not-this-fund crash/mommy's-feeling-butthurt-and-doesn't-send-adult-allowance/drugs-kicked-me-off-welfare/whatever-it-is, seriously. You'll never be able to manage a wife you don't like, two kids and a dog off interest unless you're incomprehensibly filthy fucking rich, but you'd be amazed how amazingly useful "not starving" is on occasion when you hit the real world. Even if you do "amazingly well" by the end by most societaleconomic standards... and five bucks a month homeless is an amazing shitload different than homeless on zero. Srs, and in a way you probably can't understand unless/until you've lived out in the real world no matter what life you had. M'self? Lighter. Oats. Sugar. That's what I'd go with personally, and yes, despite the fact that the oats and the sugar are technically the same thing (carb staples). The sugar helps with the moisture issue of the oats, and calories are your main defense against cold/hunger right now. Expertly trained people could supplement with dandelions.
...that doesn't mean I'm explicitly telling you to drop out of school. Whether it's good or bad... it's... a decision. Completely individual and deserving the full weight of such.
The rest of this post is just my own personal babbling...
beliefs about society
It spends much of its time trying to force other people into a little box which will, unfortunately, kill them.
beliefs about what is important
I believe that's actually one thing which I wish everyone would sit down at length and decide.
and there's a lot behind it, so yeah..
Meh. More things on "if I can't stop you from doing such a god-awful thing, what to do?"
- food. water. shelter. This is the literal definition of "being alive," if nothing else. If you've got these, everything's fine (and that's a good thing to stop and recall if you're spending too much time worrying about shit that doesn't matter - a productive hobby, like a drug habit, when done on many a moderate occasion, which can destroy your life if it starts to become 'all the time,' this worrying-about-shit-that-doesn't-matter).
If you can hook this up without nothing, that would ensure that no matter what, everything there ever is is always going to be alright. (I would like to point out that disposable garbage bags are an astounding shitload of cheap-ass tarp, but regarding immediately flinging yourself off the abyss of a choice, I don't exactly say this to encourage you just yet, no matter how mindblowing it suddenly is).
- there are exactly at least two things which lead to the question "but how is it made" - "what do I want in this earth," and "I'm bored, what should I read?"
- no matter what the hell happens, there will eventually come a time when graphic design is amazingly important to you. It doesn't actually have to be good, but if it doesn't exist at all you're going to go batshit insane and think what you've made (factually or in a representational sense) is crap. Maybe it's beadwork. Maybe it's papermaking or knowledge in organic paints. Maybe it's jewelerymaking from scrap wire from the ground and unworked stone tools - which is actually easier than you'd think, though never once easier than jewelerymaking. Whatever. Whatever it is, make sure you have something to hang about your space in your life, even if you're wiping your ass with leaves living under a plastic garbage bag. It's the difference between sanity and for some reason, utterly loathing yourself, once you've got some bare minimum. With enough time, sometimes even before then. Seriously doesn't matter what it is or where you put it. Hippies have a lot of arts (beads/hemp/macrame/flowertying/tyedye/whatever) that are simple, yet fill this category.
- whatever it is, it's always cheaper. While the search gets down to impossible, the answer to being unable to manage expense is to look harder for it.
- ...and everything that costs money was at one point guided in every step along the process by someone. Only other people cost money; if you keep looking hard enough, everythings free.
Oh. Despite that I cannot in conscience advocate any course of action in anything that is by nature always an inherently individualized instance of signifigant decision...
- whatever you do in life, whether you follow the script, whether you choose little individual pieces of the script as tools to specific ends, or if you just walk away and build something new... whatever of these you do, life's not just going to hand you what you want. You have to figure out what it is and go after it.
and, uhh
- if you're not willing to put in more than a certain amount of effort into proving how thoroughly you are someone's bitch for profit, theirs or yours is often debated, you will have to attain any of your successes from the most minimal from forums which cannot discriminate against you for anything that is not a direct physical property of the universe. DIY is one. Anything self-made is another.
- when hopping trains, trainhop your way to a region with a container deposit. Though the goal is to survive without using money or any other part of other people's world so that no matter what can happen, everything will always be alright, almost nothing financially can be more than nothing. A whole life can be bought on copper.
- you need a whole shitload lot less to survive than you think you do. Despite the fact that they went through it, your parent type organisms didn't mention a thing about it. Despite the fact that they're going to for some fucking reason try to mention this as their "ha ha wasn't I wise now kid" they do when they get old to cope with the fact that they're dying and they failed, except they didn't even mention it. Humor them. Unless you hate them. Or unless you find a way to speak the whole truth rather than smile and not that manages to give them something to fill the void left by taking away their hope to lie to tell themselves they're not failures. However, you'll run smack dab into this unless you get the starting character class Doctor(specialist) or Attorney(corporate law), and while it's literally the only damn thing that has anything to do with how well you survive, the parties historically-genetically charged with such task thought that was the one thing they wouldn't pretend to adress and wasted time with meaningless stupid shit.
Speaking of which, since you're still a short period of time from running into it, you might want to read a censored version of that list item to your parents as a prepared statement and ask them if it's true. Maybe include the phrase "that crap you skipped like how to survive" as a civil explanator after your more polite tl;dr. It might be the only chance for them to pull their head out of their ass and serve their genetic purpouse (coughforthefirsttwoyearsbeforeadulthoodatthreeass holecough) before it's past due, whatever you do, and honestly, while they wouldn't even think it has anything to do with "that job" they blamed "everything they do" (though, to you) as being, you might actually get some decent information if you ask. Don't show them the rest of that until after you've had the conversation, obviously. But if you can get it out of them - and many people aren't all that ideologically opposed into fulfilling their responsibilities in two minutes, as opposed to all that irresponsible shit they were doing for the last 16-18 years, they just never did it - but if you can get it out of them, that "so, what did you do to make it by that wall you smacked into that was the first few years" might be a fuckload of a lot more useful advice than "after we made it, we put on airs and false pretense" that is the only fucking thing that "parents" or whatever passes for such teach kids. Ever. In this society. "This is what it is to be a brain plugged into emotions" or "here is how you survive rather than amuse us" is shit they never act as if important. Even to be mentioned. Fuck.
Umm, yeah. u need live kno hao by less even if uz skript. might liek axs hao. maek worthless-weight make themz finalee useful 2 lolz k wise maek 4 wunc 'sploit useful rent? k.
- umm... stuffs.
|
|
#21
 2008-10-22, 16:37
|
Cant Quite Tell 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: A lesson for the youngsters:
Holy fucking shit, you write long posts...
|
|
#22
 2008-10-23, 01:02
|
whitelightning 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: A lesson for the youngsters:
i would have nailed chicks in high school but i didnt really care about that kind of stuff early on :(
plus every time the thought entered my head, I would think about my step mom's statement "you will never entertain any young women in your room"
one day i did.....all hell broke loose.
|
|
#23
 2008-10-23, 02:07
|
NiGhT PrOwLeR 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: A lesson for the youngsters:
I have been enlightened,
I'm gonna be one of those twats that sit in mommas '87 toyota tercel outside a highschool trolling for girls 5+ years younger :)
|
|
#24
 2008-10-23, 02:15
|
|
Regular
|
|
D!cks are for my friends
|
|
Re: A lesson for the youngsters:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cant Quite Tell
No, this isn't CP...
http://preview.tinyurl.com/3wyfke
I'm not even old, yet I'm old enough for it to be illegal. In retrospect, in High School I was SURROUNDED by hot, nubile, insecure, and generally horny chicks. Yet I was too shy/stupid/awkward/many other things to pursue the mountains of teen girls that I could fairly easily get with now with my (even pretty limited) experience and knowledge.
You will NEVER be young enough to (legally, and in the US) get with these girls again. Even if you do somehow, the rest of society will call you perverted. So hop on it now. Have a billion horribly superficial relationships. Save the good relationships for later. Don't look at http://preview.tinyurl.com/3wyfke in even as little as 5 or 6 years and have regrets.
|
You have just inspired me. Thank you!!
|
|
#25
 2008-10-23, 08:06
|
Ravendust 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: A lesson for the youngsters:
Alright
|
|
#26
 2008-10-23, 17:36
|
Cant Quite Tell 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: A lesson for the youngsters:
You have just inspired me. Thank you!!
This best not be sarcasm, young grasshopper.
Listen. If you're young, you don't know WHAT kind of opportunity you have now. Go for it.
|
|
#27
 2008-10-23, 17:46
|
callumpimp 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: A lesson for the youngsters:
i wish i could go back, and fuck all those tight naughty small titted hairless pussies. So nieve and weak minded, so impressionable..........i'd take them all one by one. Im a little turned on now...
|
|
#28
 2008-10-23, 18:00
|
|
|
Re: A lesson for the youngsters:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by callumpimp
i wish i could go back, and fuck all those tight naughty small titted hairless pussies. So nieve and weak minded, so impressionable..........i'd take them all one by one. Im a little turned on now...
|
Have you seen 13-14 year olds these days? Naive and weak-minded my ass.
|
|
#29
 2008-10-23, 21:28
|
Elsasser 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: A lesson for the youngsters:
You fuckers
JoePedo actually had something useful and enlightening to say and all you can think about is banging highschool chicks
|
|
#30
 2008-10-23, 21:48
|
callumpimp 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: A lesson for the youngsters:
Have you seen 13-14 year olds these days? Naive and weak-minded my ass.
where the fuck do u live man
|
|
#31
 2008-10-23, 23:27
|
Gadooosh! 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: A lesson for the youngsters:
This thread gets my approval :D
|
|
#32
 2008-10-24, 04:42
|
|
|
Re: A lesson for the youngsters:
They just want fun and "love" when they're that young. They don't want money yet!
That's not true at all.
|
|
#33
 2008-11-23, 02:31
|
kenton 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: A lesson for the youngsters:
Cool Joe, I just found your massive wall of text after my absence from Totse…sorry it took so long! I realize you write most of your posts for a different audience then the people who ask the questions but I feel like I need to reply anyway because you took the time to write said wall of text!
Can you imagine five hundred of the world's chillest elder hippies pondering that questions about their regular hippie festivals for two or three years?
Like some gigantic psychedelic think-tank? Haha that’d be awesome, why not just make that a form of government…
I could get into said techniques, but I won't. There's ancient knowledge out there. Trouble is, I'm not exactly sure about to what degree it's not my job to chat about shit...
Sweet Joe, whenever you get close to revealing the nitty-gritty, the good stuff, it’s always either cryptic or not-there. But yeah, I could see why you’d want something like that a secret, you can get an idea though from Hoffman or Leary though, no?
...ever read up on the psychology of orphans in a brutal all-against-all civil war? Ever wonder if maybe the social effects of bias homicides over a non-visible prejudice would in essence make someone a total orphan, regardless of their legal status or disposition?
Yeah makes sense, I haven’t read specifically about it but I’ve read, uhh, Enders Shadow, and I looked up some studies…crazy hyper-alert killing machines, huh; interestingly enough the two mega-smart people I’ve heard about also apparently had childhoods like this, you…and Chris Langan, oh not to mention House, haha.
The complete and malicious self-destruction of the social group or any pretense to civil social order creates a clear response, and it is well adapted to the environment which precipitates.
Not sure I’m reading this right, you’re talking about the genocide of cops and heterosexuals or you’re talking about the self-destruction of those discriminated by bias? Basically you’re saying there’s no such thing as any stable society, unless everyone accepts everyone, or everyone is the same?
But, that doesn't neccesarily mean that one shouldn't just up and make a world that doesn't do shit like that. When someone comes along to knock over the sand castle you made because they're too dumb to make something of their own, simply send out the made-in-childhood sociopathic killers whose sole wish to end the pain of their war-torn childhood environment is suicide in getback for the life they were given by these perperatrors.
Ok I see it now; the psychological trauma is so great of the early-childhood life that they go out in flames of a burning fireball of revenge, which is to say if you couldn’t manage your mind, you’d be dead right now… But seriously, I think I’m getting the picture, the biggest upraising would be those who grew up in those areas and were discriminated against, which makes me believe you that you do have your whole pedophile underground army.
Without that natural counterbalancing, shit's built up, and the trouble is we're in an age where the next bloody kansas will be nuclear.
That is fucking scary. I have no fucking clue what it’s like to be one of those people, however, I hope they have much more love for humanity than I do... ;) That and I hope they don’t have the resources to make a nuke or any other mass-killing device.
You want to try the peaceful route? That's cool - whatever's quickest. But not only will I not hold back on pushing the button when the time comes, but I'm honestly scared shitless of being blown to bits by the people around me, the entire mad fuckload of them - not that I'd feel a thing, but that it's undesireable - and I cannot in conscience speak a word to ask them so as to request to stop them.
I’m kind of wondering why it hasn’t already happened… For novelties sake though I do hope mankind continues because of what we can invent. To borrow an idea from Terrence McKenna if someone could invent a drug to make us remember our dreams it would change the world. Or something like virtual reality… I think just the implications would transform society. There ya go, that’s my best idea, though it’s not really mine…
Remember, since the last approximate statistic was .125 of the populace, there happen to be 7,500,000 sheepfuckers bloodthirsty to blow you to bits in the course of sterilizing the entire face of the planet in response to you mistreating their people.
Sorry…but I couldn’t help lolling. I should take this more seriously, I know…
Ok I gotta go...more later but thanks for the conversation, I admit it I live the cushy life of the privileged upper-middle class but it's really fun to see what the real world is like or at least what is is from your view ;) so thanks! More soon!
|
|
#34
 2008-11-23, 02:35
|
|
|
Re: A lesson for the youngsters:
I plan to fuck at least teen age girl, some day, not matter how old I am.
|
|
Tags
|
hawt
|
| Thread Tools |
 Show Printable Version
 Email this Page
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
 Switch to Hybrid Mode
 Switch to Threaded Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
To the best of our knowledge, the text on this page may be freely reproduced and distributed.

totse.com certificate signatures
|
 |
 |
About | Community | Bad Ideas | Drugs | Ego | Erotica | Fringe | Society | Technology
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|