About
Community
Bad Ideas
Drugs
Ego
Erotica
Fringe
Society
Technology
register | bbs | search | rss | faq | about
meet up | add to del.icio.us | digg it
Go Back   Community > Vices > Sex and Affection
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Sex and Affection Anything and everything about sex and relations. Please try to keep this forum on-topic, since things tend to wander a bit. Search through old topics before posting a new one, as questions get repeated a lot here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 #1 
Old 2008-10-16, 16:44
Acolyte
 
Default Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

Whats with guys who "LOVE" Girl on girl action. They act like its the best damned thing since Nintendo Wii.

I think the real reason so many guys are turned on by it is because they are afraid of female/male contact that involves a dick that isnt theirs. Girl to Girl contact is basically a way for them to see a girl getting physical without the risk of their eyes wondering to a cock.

So if we look at this solid evidence guys who are obsessed with girl on girl action are actually "Closet cases".
 #2 
Old 2008-10-16, 16:48
Regular
 
Back of the food stamp line
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

I think girl on girl is fucking hot. Girls are often delicate and curvy, so putting two of them together is extremely pleasing. :)
 #3 
Old 2008-10-16, 16:50
Regular
 
California
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

id rather see man on man, at least there's some fucking penetration
 #4 
Old 2008-10-16, 17:46
dark-easterbunny dark-easterbunny is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

Girl on girl is way more erotic, they are.....it's like a beautifull dance between 2 curved beautifull bodies

Overrated by most men though but that's cause they never get the chance to see the reall thing without payin for it (no, porn does not count)
 #5 
Old 2008-10-16, 17:49
Regular
 
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

I agree. Then again, I'm not a fan of the ladies.
 #6 
Old 2008-10-16, 18:04
Bean_Doodle Bean_Doodle is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

Guys like that just wanna belong.

Its boring.
 #7 
Old 2008-10-16, 18:14
Gadooosh! Gadooosh! is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

It's good for so long then it gets boring/weird.
 #8 
Old 2008-10-16, 21:36
Regular
 
Back of the food stamp line
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

Quote:
Originally Posted by dark-easterbunny
Girl on girl is way more erotic, they are.....it's like a beautifull dance between 2 curved beautifull bodies

Overrated by most men though but that's cause they never get the chance to see the reall thing without payin for it (no, porn does not count)


For sure. The guys that are like "OMG YEAH BRO GET OVER HERE TWO CHICKS ARE TOTALLY MACKIN' ON EACHOTHER BRO." need to settle down and re-evaluate their priorities.
 #9 
Old 2008-10-16, 22:22
Malkog Malkog is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

I agree. And what's more the Wii sucks too.
 #10 
Old 2008-10-16, 22:48
dark-easterbunny dark-easterbunny is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

For sure. The guys that are like "OMG YEAH BRO GET OVER HERE TWO CHICKS ARE TOTALLY MACKIN' ON EACHOTHER BRO." need to settle down and re-evaluate their priorities.

exactly , while what you should do as a men, i continue whatever the fuck you we're doing, sure look for a moment like you want , just don't pretend anything special is happening (cause it ain't) ohw and make sure one of the girls is your gf cause that sometimes makes the evenings ending quite more interesting
 #11 
Old 2008-10-16, 23:17
Get a Job Get a Job is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

You're all ghey.
 #12 
Old 2008-10-16, 23:25
Regular
 
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATTTTTXXXXXXX
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

Any guy that doesn't like girl on girl action is homo, nuff said.
 #13 
Old 2008-10-17, 01:22
Regular
 
California
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

Quote:
Originally Posted by struggling artist
Any guy that doesn't like girl on girl action is homo, nuff said.


really

why don't you just shut the fuck up and give me some dome (head)
 #14 
Old 2008-10-17, 01:30
Havoc737903 Havoc737903 is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malkog
I agree. And what's more the Wii sucks too.


This.
 #15 
Old 2008-10-17, 01:31
Regular
 
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

When a guy and a girl fuck, the guy has the power because he has the dick and controls penetration (generally speaking). When a girl and a girl fuck, they can play around with power roles and take turns taking charge and leading the other.

I totally understand why girls would get into it and it's hot to watch. I used to let my ex sleep with any woman she liked, provided she told me about it and I could watch. She wouldn't let me join in though :(, "Unless the chick is a total lesbian so she's not interested in you".

It never happened.
 #16 
Old 2008-10-17, 02:12
chipotes chipotes is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

girl on girl can get pretty boring. its still fucking hawt
 #17 
Old 2008-10-17, 06:11
Regular
 
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

Whats with guys who "LOVE" Girl on girl action.

Well, you almost have it right in the next part of your post...

Let's assume for a second that people are either heterosexual or homosexual. This obviously isn't true - I for instance am neither, and other posters are bisexual - but for a moment, it's a temporarily useful simplification.

Now, let's turn right around and destroy that for a moment. A heterosexual female and a homosexual male are attracted to the same squishy bits, 'n vice versa for those who like gurls. So, continuing the hetero/homo false-dichotomy fiction in its new form, let's assume that everyone is either an androphile or a gynophile, and exclusively so at that. Yes, it's a fiction, but an illustrative one.

Androphiles will enjoy looking at nekkid males.
Androphiles will be neutral or worse to looking at nekkid females.

gynophiles will enjoy looking at nekkid females.
gynophiles will be neutral or worse to looking at nekkid males.

Ergo, for any gynophile, all else being equal - two females is twice the fun, three females is three times the fun, a hundred females is a hundred times the fun, etc, while a male takes up space while adding nothing to the equation.

So, you're almost there when you said...

Girl to Girl contact is basically a way for them to see a girl getting physical without the risk of their eyes wondering to a cock.

...this. But it's not so much a "risk" - exclusive, in this case, gynophilia doesn't require an aversion to seeing a male. However, that male is taking up space on the set which could be occupied by MOAR FEMALE, and even occasionally blocking some of the interesting bits by standing between something female and the camera, damn them.

You can even model the whole thing mathematically, if you wish - screen area occupied by male form divided by total screen area for a percentage, a probabalistic assesment as to whether a male will be in front of or behind a given female at any moment, perhaps a probabalistic assesment of how much overlap - either female-over-male or male-over-female, handled seperately - is statistically likely at a given moment... and suddenly, you actually have a discrete mathematical value of how much enjoyment-of-female has been removed by the presence of the male, down to the very last pixel.

...but, you'll always have to add the positive value of the enjoyment of one female to your total. She could have been standing in the space he took up, instead.

(if any crazy bastard wants to DO the math - average the number of pixels in the sprite for the male at 0, 45, and 90 degrees to the camera, divide by the number of pixels in the entire screen that's below the lowest Y value on the screen any female body part can realistically attain and above the highest Y value (eg Max_X * (y2 - y1)), and then divide it in half for a 50/50 chance of a given male being in front of or behind any given female, and you'll have an averaged "risk index" for how much is likely to be lost by the presence of the male. Go ahead. Give it a try. Further modifications can be developed involving total female pixel occupation divided by total area to describe the chance of a male or female crossing over the other in the space on the screen, but in hawt pr0n, it's usually not distance shots. Go ahead. Do the math. Have fun. Entertain your friends by calculating the "porn value" of each lineup - they'll be impressed!)
 #18 
Old 2008-10-17, 06:25
Regular
 
Bay Area, Ca
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

This obviously isn't true - I for instance am neither

I always knew you were a fucking robot.
 #19 
Old 2008-10-17, 06:33
ObsdianZ ObsdianZ is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

I always knew you were a fucking robot.

Actually, I think it has something to do with prepubescent children looking rather androgenous :D.

*ObZ
 #20 
Old 2008-10-17, 09:21
Mitchell Y. McDeere Mitchell Y. McDeere is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

Girl to Girl contact is basically a way for them to see a girl getting physical without the risk of their eyes wondering to a cock.

Call me homo, but I would much prefer to see a chick squeezin her tits while another chick eats her out with her nice rump in the air rather than look at a guys hairy butt-crack while he covers up all the good stuff.
 #21 
Old 2008-10-17, 10:10
Regular
 
Straya
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

OP just wants to see some dick in his porn.
 #22 
Old 2008-10-17, 16:37
ThunderChunk ThunderChunk is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

For sure. The guys that are like "OMG YEAH BRO GET OVER HERE TWO CHICKS ARE TOTALLY MACKIN' ON EACHOTHER BRO." need to settle down and re-evaluate their priorities.

you just made girl on girl action, sound incredibly boring. Its like an eclipse their so rare, to be able to catch that in action one has to act quickly, and tell all his buddies as fast as possible. Plus true happiness is only achieved, when shared. :)
 #23 
Old 2008-10-17, 16:51
Regular
 
Back of the food stamp line
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

you just made girl on girl action, sound incredibly boring. Its like an eclipse their so rare, to be able to catch that in action one has to act quickly, and tell all his buddies as fast as possible. Plus true happiness is only achieved, when shared. :)

Hahah, agreed. I generally point it out when I see something hot, so when I see girl on girl action, I usually make a comment like "Woah, you guys are hot." Yelling might scare them away :(
 #24 
Old 2008-10-17, 17:52
Regular
 
Sydney, Australia
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

I can't stand most girl/girl porn, it's too boring. It's always too soft, I like to see 2 girls get rough with each other, none of this tender kissing and soft licking shit. And the next girl/girl porno I see that turns into a piss fetish video, I'm gonna fucking scream. And is it atleast fucking possible to get a lesbian scene that doesn't turn into a foot fetish video at some point either?
 #25 
Old 2008-10-17, 17:57
Regular
 
Bay Area, Ca
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

Actually, I think it has something to do with prepubescent children looking rather androgenous :D.

*ObZ

Possibly. However I still look at him as the wise, pedophiliac, robot.

The wise, pedophiliac, robot that I never had.
 #26 
Old 2008-10-17, 19:39
Regular
 
wittyandorinsultingtag
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

Girl on girl is for closets for sure.
 #27 
Old 2008-10-17, 21:32
Regular
 
Shangri-La
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

Quote:
Originally Posted by EssJay
I can't stand most girl/girl porn, it's too boring. It's always too soft, I like to see 2 girls get rough with each other, none of this tender kissing and soft licking shit. And the next girl/girl porno I see that turns into a piss fetish video, I'm gonna fucking scream. And is it atleast fucking possible to get a lesbian scene that doesn't turn into a foot fetish video at some point either?


Oh, its out there man, you just gotta find it. Some of the best shit you'll see.

Also, OP is most likely a closet homo for wanting to see dick rather than another set of tits.
 #28 
Old 2008-10-17, 23:52
delerium tremens delerium tremens is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

As soon as cyborgs become practical im gonna go girly nd get some girl on girl action. I'm not even joking. I wank over this shit at night
 #29 
Old 2008-10-17, 23:55
freeRadical freeRadical is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

Quote:
Originally Posted by xxombie
I think girl on girl is fucking hot. Girls are often delicate and curvy, so putting two of them together is extremely pleasing. :)


Fucking this.
 #30 
Old 2008-10-17, 23:57
freeRadical freeRadical is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

For sure. The guys that are like "OMG YEAH BRO GET OVER HERE TWO CHICKS ARE TOTALLY MACKIN' ON EACHOTHER BRO." need to settle down and re-evaluate their priorities.

I think my priorities are fine, thank you very much. And, I do not sound like that.
 #31 
Old 2008-10-18, 07:58
Regular
 
Sydney, Australia
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

Oh, its out there man, you just gotta find it. Some of the best shit you'll see.

Yeah, it is really fucking hard to find, I think Pirates had some ok stuff. And redtube/youporn/eskimotube isn't much help at all, it's mostly the soft shit.
 #32 
Old 2008-10-18, 08:08
tapas tapas is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

Nothing funn(i)er than getting two hot drunk chicks to make out at parties. :p
 #33 
Old 2008-10-18, 08:56
Bean_Doodle Bean_Doodle is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

I went to this party after tripping balls on mushrooms last night.
I was enjoying the afterglow and wasn't really in a party mood, so I just made myself at home in a sweet sofa and cracked a beer and just relaxed and enjoyed philosophizing on the nature of parties and beer in the awesome mushroom aftergow.

Then like 4 girls come sit on me and start making out, across me, Im like kay.
Then they're like "hey, youre that cute guy with the gray hat!"
Im like "yeah? who the hell are you?"
Then we made out

The point of this story is that I liked it better when she made out with me
 #34 
Old 2008-10-18, 09:46
Scholar Scholar is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

Meh I'd honestly prefer to see to girls holding hands and in love with eachother that would be awesome cute.

I accept gay guys doing these things but it just doesn't appeal to me that much because I like girls, hard to explain... just watch Strawberry Panic fuck.
 #35 
Old 2008-10-18, 21:47
Wacko Wacko is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

Well... I do find girl on girl quite sexy.

But this one time, at a concert, there was this really good looking girl. A while later, i started a chat with her, bought her a drink and that kinda crap. All in all, it's all going nicely. Suddenly, another chick comes walking by, sits next to the one i was talking to. About 2 seconds later, they're making out, right in front of me. So first i was like 'Hell yeah! Thats hot'. Second thing you realize 'Fuck, i cant score neither of them.'
 #36 
Old 2008-10-19, 00:11
Regular
 
Chicago IL USA
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caint afford Food
Whats with guys who "LOVE" Girl on girl action. They act like its the best damned thing since Nintendo Wii.

I think the real reason so many guys are turned on by it is because they are afraid of female/male contact that involves a dick that isnt theirs. Girl to Girl contact is basically a way for them to see a girl getting physical without the risk of their eyes wondering to a cock.

So if we look at this solid evidence guys who are obsessed with girl on girl action are actually "Closet cases".


I am a guy and I agree.
 #37 
Old 2008-10-19, 00:55
bored_teen bored_teen is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bean_Doodle
I went to this party after tripping balls on mushrooms last night.
I was enjoying the afterglow and wasn't really in a party mood, so I just made myself at home in a sweet sofa and cracked a beer and just relaxed and enjoyed philosophizing on the nature of parties and beer in the awesome mushroom aftergow.

Then like 4 girls come sit on me and start making out, across me, Im like kay.
Then they're like "hey, youre that cute guy with the gray hat!"
Im like "yeah? who the hell are you?"
Then we made out

The point of this story is that I liked it better when she made out with me


lulz. much lulz.
 #38 
Old 2008-10-19, 00:57
Regular
 
wittyandorinsultingtag
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

Meh I'd honestly prefer to see to girls holding hands and in love with eachother that would be awesome cute.

GOD thats gay
 #39 
Old 2008-10-19, 01:47
Regular
 
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

Actually, I think it has something to do with prepubescent children looking rather androgenous.

Nah. I just refuse to let others - especially those who might not have my best interests at heart - steal and subsume my identity. I don't do dick at any age, but I don't do fish either.

As a completely-unrelated side-note, they're actually less androgynous in form than you think. There are several periods of sex-differentiation, and a few of them happen before puberty - intrauterine androgenization or estrogenization occurs before birth, for instance, and adrenarche at 6, prepuberty at about 8 or 9... assuming a puberty of about 12... and yes, the androgenizing/estrogenizing surge of prepuberty IS completely distinct from the surge of puberty itself, and is why you'll occasionally (through proper alignment of the stars) see what appears to be beautiful women of about college age that are really 11 year old girls flat as a board. ;) There are also multiple deandrogynizations that occur well after puberty, too... there's a reason men start growing hair in random places a few seperate times after about 25, and believe it or not, the "bear potbelly" - firm yet bulging - is a gender-specific fat deposit of intra-abdominal fat for short-term storage and access. In a sense, the "skinny potbellied look" is the male breast; a sex-distinctive fat deposition. Hair loss, triggered in suceptible individuals by the androgen dihydrotestosterone (which is several times more powerful than test, btw), also tends to show up in a sex-differentiating surge well after puberty.

But I also like SLL's "my whole life, I dreamed of a pedophilic robot" answer. Epic random; epic win. :D

(p.s.... delicouspun? according to last-known-story... she is, I think)
 #40 
Old 2008-10-19, 01:50
Stinky Spic Stinky Spic is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

^Creepy.
 #41 
Old 2008-10-19, 06:30
Regular
 
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

^ Stinky.
 #42 
Old 2008-10-20, 09:35
Regular
 
wittyandorinsultingtag
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

Well, my sentence was still accurate then :O

Also joe, you know alot of shit. Tell us all how to get girls with mindcontrol etc
 #43 
Old 2008-10-20, 20:34
Nefret Nefret is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

I think girl on girl is mediocre and I've been there a fair amount of times. Refer to crazy lesbian threesome on the kitchen floor with the local hot bartender.
In anycase I prefer my sex to include penises at some point. Girl on girl just doesn't cut it for me.
 #44 
Old 2008-10-21, 02:45
wallstreetshuffle wallstreetshuffle is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caint afford Food
Whats with guys who "LOVE" Girl on girl action. They act like its the best damned thing since Nintendo Wii.

I think the real reason so many guys are turned on by it is because they are afraid of female/male contact that involves a dick that isnt theirs. Girl to Girl contact is basically a way for them to see a girl getting physical without the risk of their eyes wondering to a cock.

So if we look at this solid evidence guys who are obsessed with girl on girl action are actually "Closet cases".


So you're saying you dont like girl on girl because you like looking at another mans cock?
 #45 
Old 2008-10-31, 13:42
pulse7 pulse7 is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Girl on Girl= Not that fucking amazing

My boyfriend (I'm female by the way) loves girl on girl action, and luckily I’m bi. Its not the fact that he doesn’t want to see another guys dick, its purely just fucking hot for girls to be rubbing their tits against each others, kissing, licking etc. If they’re downloading porn and just want girl on girl action that’s totally fine, I mean, do you like getting off when there’s another guys dick fucking the girl you’re watching?
 
To the best of our knowledge, the text on this page may be freely reproduced and distributed.
 

totse.com certificate signatures
 
 
About | Community | Bad Ideas | Drugs | Ego | Erotica | Fringe | Society | Technology
Hot Topics