Re: Conservapedia
It's gotta be a joke I mean c'mon
"Wikipedia promoted to good status, or GA, its smear entry about Conservapedia, in which Wikipedia claims that Conservapedia "has received much criticism from those who have accused it of factual inaccuracies."[27] When Conservapedia pointed out the lack of support (which violates stated Wikipedia policy) for this false smear of Conservapedia, Wikipedia simply replaced its prior cite with a new one that also failed to support its smear. After this was pointed out, Wikipedia simply changed its sentence to try to smear Conservapedia in another way."
http://www.conservapedia.com/Bias_in_Wikipedia
...or it's just sad to see people have wasted their lives in the pursuit of something so meaningless.
|