This is the BS I have to abide by:

element 1
Read an inclusive variety of written texts and record the reading experience.
Range: at least nine written texts from at least three different categories - categories
may include contemporary novel, pre-20th century text, collection of short
stories, drama, poetry anthology, extended magazine articles, biography,
reference books, website.
performance criteria
1.1
Selection includes more than one cultural perspective and has regard to gender
balance.
1.2
Reading includes at least two texts with an established critical reputation.
1.3
Reading log records date of main entry, gives title and writer or source of each
text, and a brief personal response with specific reference to details of each
text.
1.4
Evidence of texts having been read is demonstrated for at least one random
sample text recorded in the reading log.
Range: evidence of text having been read could be through discussion, orother appropriate written, oral, or visual form.

Here's what I have so far, this is my first one, fuck it fails, I need more personal opinion, and that is VERY HARD:

Name of text: Frankenstein

Name of writer: Mary Shelley

Date read: March 2008

Type of text: Novel

Cultural Perspective: British

Gender Perspective: Female

Literary Reputation: NA

This book was quite a good read for me. I have always enjoyed horror novels, and thought to myself, “why not read Frankenstein?” After a while of searching on the internet, I came across this book and downloaded it. The story begins in the icy northern waters where a captain is travelling to the North Pole. Events take place throughout Europe, in Scotland, England, and Switzerland. The story is about a man named Victor Frankenstein, who “creates” a man out of old body parts, and his guilt for creating such a monster. When the Frankenstein monster realises how he was “created” and is rejected from mankind, he seeks revenge against his creator’s family to avenge his own sorrow. Once the monster has learned that Victor has died, he is overcome by sadness and vows to burn himself alive at the “the Northernmost extremity of the globe”. If I was in the monster’s situation, I would do what he did,

An interesting character in this novel was Frankenstein’s monster; this monster didn’t even get a name. This was my favourite character in the whole novel. Victor shows his rejection towards this being by referring to it as “demon”, “fiend”, “monster” and “wretch” throughout the novel. The monster gains the “power of speech” by living in the woodshed of a little cottage out in the wilderness. He eavesdrops all of their conversations, and learns everything about the peasants living in the cottage. In this entire novel, the only person whom he really considered family was Victor himself, and the blind man in the cottage, because the blind man could not see his “ugliness”.

A theme in this novel is searching for love. Throughout it, the monster tries to search for love several times, but does not find anything. He knows he is horrid and unloved although he still tries to find love, but is ultimately rejected and disappointed constantly.

Fuck, I didn't think lvl 2 needed different cultures. Thought that was only lvl 1. Oh and thanks for the book review. That's three down 6 more to go.

This review sucks, I'd laugh if you actually passed if you use this, then again, I'd laugh if you failed.

This review sucks, I'd laugh if you actually passed if you use this, then again, I'd laugh if you failed.

You need shit all to pass the review

You need shit all to pass the review
I failed a Harry Potter one due to bs. Give me one of yours.

They have to have a variety of different attributes, such as one from a Maori author (fuckin' niggers), one from a female author, one from a male author, bs like that.


You in NZ? I have to the the same shit for NCEA. I fucking hate NCEA, it is the bane of my life.

Do they do external review of book reports or can 20 diffrent people turn in the same paper and get off?

You in NZ? I have to the the same shit for NCEA. I fucking hate NCEA, it is the bane of my life.

Do they do external review of book reports or can 20 diffrent people turn in the same paper and get off?

How the hell can you hate NCEA. It's the most pathetically easy system EVER. I'm still Yr 12 and I've almost passed lvl 3

How the hell can you hate NCEA. It's the most pathetically easy system EVER. I'm still Yr 12 and I've almost passed lvl 3
Post up some writing that you've done, if you've got any.

The assessments aren't really hard, they're just gay and I can't be fucked doing them, like the speech one, easiest three credits ever, but who the fuck likes doing speeches? (No, I did not do it.)

Ian Rogers: Yes, I'm in NZ.

Book reviews aren't external.

Post up some writing that you've done, if you've got any.

The assessments aren't really hard, they're just gay and I can't be fucked doing them, like the speech one, easiest three credits ever, but who the fuck likes doing speeches? (No, I did not do it.)

Ian Rogers: Yes, I'm in NZ.

Book reviews aren't external.

Yeah right. I'm not posting them in case they get moderated. Besides, you have to do some questions on a random review that the teacher chooses to proove you actually read it.

Speeches are fun!

Yeah right. I'm not posting them in case they get moderated. Besides, you have to do some questions on a random review that the teacher chooses to proove you actually read it.

Speeches are fun!
No, not at my school. Lawl.

P.S. You're a cocksucker if you like speeches.

No, not at my school. Lawl.

P.S. You're a cocksucker if you like speeches.

That's part of the standard so I'd say you do it.