Quote:
Originally Posted by eBagger
I saw this discussed on another forum and found it pretty interesting.
Animals do it sometimes. We do it sometimes.
They don't understand about rape, we do. Yet some men's sexual urges push them so far over the edge they forcefully have sex with another woman.
Would you rape someone if there was a 100% chance you wouldn't get caught?
|
For animals, I dunno if I'd call it rape simply because rape seems to imply that one is aware that forced sex isn't 'morally correct behavior' or is 'taboo.' I think for it to be rape it needs to be seen as 'morally incorrect' or 'taboo' by the participants. It seems normal for animals to have forced sex, but for humans it is not 'normal,' and thus we label it.
We have urges to fuck, and the urges are natural. Forced sex would be natural if we didn't live in a structured society that criminalizes said action.
That being said, most men who actually rape don't do it for the sex, or so the psychologists say. I've always heard it referred to as more of a desire to dominate or have power over the woman, or to humiliate her. Personally, I'd do it for the sex rather than some other stupid reason.
If I 100% wouldn't get caught and I was attracted to the girl, I'd probably do it. I'd stipulate this on the conditions that I use a condom and not physically injure the girl. I wouldn't want disease or pregnancy, basically any unpleasant physical consequences. I also would find it repugnant to physically hurt a girl if I was receiving pleasure from her.