Why the fuck waste time respecting any bitches? Just break them all down till they are nothing but just whores, objects, slaves. After getting out of this relationship, I see how useless women's emotions are and you will be much better off having them as an object that only work at your command.

lol XD

Good idea!

Good idea!
^ ^
0 0
~V~

"Why the fuck waste time respecting any females? Just break them all down till they are nothing but just whores, objects, slaves. After getting out of this relationship, I see how useless women's emotions are and you will be much better off having them as an object that only work at your command."

This message endorsed by easeoflife.

Treat females how they like to be treated :D Win/Win

Should we start a petition or something?

Yea mang, bitches aint shit but hoes and tricks!

Oh Hell yea Man...Chicks emotions are confusing as hell, and they dictate what truth is in their minds. "But, thats the way I feel" Bullshit, you're emotions don't mean shit when the real world contradicts your "feelings" on the situation. You know that if you look at the facts, somehow it just makes sense! I'm not sure how it works either...

^^^ Fuck yes they are confusing, annoying as all hell.

Since when do females have emotions??

Unless you're talking about those little acts they put on to trick you into thinking they're human... But everyone knows it's all a well played facade, n00b.

Well, OP had a nasty breakup.

Yesterday my girl and I were kind of wrestling/fooling around. After we stopped , she proclaimed she was "a little bit mad" at me. I was like wtf? She went on about how I'm bigger and stronger than her and used it to my advantage and she was not cool with that. But then she mentioned that she is emotionally manipulative and manages to confuse the hell out of me fairly often... so in effect it evens out. At least she admits to being manipulative; how many women do that? :p

Yesterday my girl and I were kind of wrestling/fooling around. After we stopped , she proclaimed she was "a little bit mad" at me. I was like wtf? She went on about how I'm bigger and stronger than her and used it to my advantage and she was not cool with that. But then she mentioned that she is emotionally manipulative and manages to confuse the hell out of me fairly often... so in effect it evens out. At least she admits to being manipulative; how many women do that? :p

Jesus Christ!

You call that a fair trade?

You overpower her briefly in a bout of play wrestling, and she admits to being emotionally manipulative and generally a dishonest person?

She tricked you with her candor though... Just goes to show how effective they all are at their little head games.

emotionally manipulative and generally a dishonest person?

Emotionally manipulative != dishonest.
She doesn't lie to me. She's manipulative in the sense that she'll decide not to tell me how she feels about certain things when I ask her because she can't quite find the right words to match up with her emotion. Which has the unfortunate consequence of driving me nuts. But she eventually figures it out. It's not like she's intentionally fucking with my head to get what she wants. That shit doesn't fly with me.

Emotionally manipulative != dishonest.
She doesn't lie to me. She's manipulative in the sense that she'll decide not to tell me how she feels about certain things when I ask her because she can't quite find the right words to match up with her emotion. Which has the unfortunate consequence of driving me nuts. But she eventually figures it out. It's not like she's intentionally fucking with my head to get what she wants. That shit doesn't fly with me.

Alright, well I guess that's a bit different than what I was imagining.

But still, the fact that she even brought that up at that moment just shows that she just HAS to exert some kind of power in the relationship to compensate for the fact that you overpower her physically. Women always have to hold all the cards...

That wasn't a stab at you or anything. Just my general anger and distrust towards the female gender. :p

Maybe your feelings are the confusing ones. Nigger.

It's a well established fact that women are the fucked up, illogical ones.

Amen brother!

women have no place in our electoral process (in America), nor do they have a place anywhere outside the kitchen! There is one exception, and that is of course the room where my bed is.

Women are cute and cuddly - every man should own one.

the words owned come to mind.

Always be two or three steps ahead of anyone in anything.
You're like 17.5 behind her.

Nothing says 'I've moved on' more than a personal vendetta against a whole gender.
<3

Something to help the OP out in the future:

Women base their decisions on emotions.
Men base their decisions on thoughts.

Neither is more right than the other, it's just how the sexes are. Figure out how to emotionally satisfy a woman, and you don't need to worry about this shit. You failed at your duty as the man in the relationship.

Male Job: make her feel safe and free at the same time. (This requires simultaneously being a hard motherfucker and a softy at the same time, depending on situation...something your genes should take care of if you don't let ego-delusions get in the way)

Female Job: fuck him, feed him, have his babies after he has proven his genes worth passing on.
(This requires a bed, a stove, and fertility)

This isn't difficult shit.

Something to help the OP out in the future:

Women base their decisions on emotions.
Men base their decisions on thoughts.

Uh, I always considered emotions a type of thought. Don't you mean logic?

The rest of your post I agree with.

I eat little fucks like you for breakfast.

Mmmm, yummy, hurt little panda.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dSJxvi767kQ

http://youtube.com/watch?v=T0xoKiH8JJM

Uh, I always considered emotions a type of thought. Don't you mean logic?

The rest of your post I agree with.

Emotions can color our thoughts if we let them, I suppose. My emotions tend to come across physically...sadness is when I'm tired, weakened...anger I'm flushed, bolstered, ready to fuckin' go...happy, I have a boner and feel good. My thoughts tend to be completely independent of how I feel, but emotions tend to affect my body without really influencing my thoughts.

I always figured that women don't really think, they just feel and react. Like sex robots. I think that makes me a sexist, but I still treat women with respect regardless of my caveman beliefs.

As for a real answer: No, I did not mean logic. Men and women are both capable of using logic if they are a logical individual. It's just that the premises for the logic sequence vary between one's feelings and one's thoughts depending on gender dominance in the individual. This why women 'feel like doing' and men 'think about doing'.

Mother: I feel like going to the park today. The sun's just picking me up and the clear sky...(20 minute ramble about how she feels)
Father: I think we should go to the park today. We could probably kill a couple bucks and make a year's worth of jerky.

Dad was thinking about food and hunting, mom was feeling uplifted. They both decide to go to the park, for completely different reasons, both through their own process of logic based on specific parameters.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=T0xoKiH8JJM

No. We're not. Different for sure, but not better. Last I recall, I need a vagina to get laid just as much as I need my penis.

You just proved my point. The only thing women are good for is the thing in between their legs.

EARTH!

edit: I mean WIND!

It's not like she's intentionally fucking with my head to get what she wants.

Hahahaha, think what you want.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=T0xoKiH8JJM

He's actually right about a lot of things. He's got a LOT of balls though to go and say something like that on TV. He's probably alienated many sexual opportunities.

The thing is, no matter how much a man might hate women, he has to keep is mouth shut if he wants to keep getting laid.

Another thing I find funny is that there are probably so many "men" out there who will externally disagree with guys like him because they're so pussy-whipped.

If men and women ever went to war, it would be horribly unbalanced because NO woman would turn against another woman, but almost ALL men would turn against their own just to impress a bunch of chicks.

Absolutely pathetic.

Do me a favor:

http://www.sexvaginas.info/wp-content/uploads/2006/10/sex-vagina.JPG
Stick with this^^^

and leave the rest of society alone.

And btw, that Dick Masterson guy is probably just an IRL troll.

Surprisingly GC.

Sure...if you really think that, my guess is that you're a very lonely person. You probably get laid a fair deal, but have no real emotional depth in your life. Your inner temple is a wasteland of bitterness and contempt for your mother, with an unhealthy urge to dominate women to carry out a foolish vengeance you should have let go a long time ago.

Just so you know, buddy, every woman isn't your mother. Good ones do exist. Really good ones.

And chances are, you're just being a little bitch about whatever resentment it is you so strongly carry against your mother. Did she spank you? Drink too much? Cheat on daddy? Let the shit go so you can enjoy women. They're worth having around.

Sure...if you really think that, my guess is that you're a very lonely person. You probably get laid a fair deal, but have no real emotional depth in your life. Your inner temple is a wasteland of bitterness and contempt for your mother, with an unhealthy urge to dominate women to carry out a foolish vengeance you should have let go a long time ago.

Just so you know, buddy, every woman isn't your mother. Good ones do exist. Really good ones.

And chances are, you're just being a little bitch about whatever resentment it is you so strongly carry against your mother. Did she spank you? Drink too much? Cheat on daddy? Let the shit go so you can enjoy women. They're worth having around.

Thank you very much for this.

Meh, if that's what you like. I make my girl happy, and she gives me lots of sex. Plus, I don't know about you, but I like making other people happy (unless it's a one-sided relationship).

I like life when i don't hate people or distrust them.

That's cause you end up with shitty girls, note how I used the operative term girls as opposed to women to signify the lack of maturity.

Which is why I have a thing for smart women.

Protip: life is more fun and more fulfilling when you see others as equals and enjoy them as human beings.

Just sayin'

I agree with you when looking for a significant other, but do you truly view everyone as equals?

from the homeless to warren buffet?
or the mentally retarded to the average individual?

I'll be honest here: I don't see everyone as equals, but that doesn't matter so much as whether or not I treat them equally. I'll slit Warren Buffet's throat as quickly as a crackhead's if he tries to break into my house. Contrarily, if both a crackhead and Warren Buffet are walking along a sidewalk and I pass them, I'll greet them both and wish them a nice day.

Principles before personalities, I suppose. It's not that I treat a crackhead any differently than I would a rich man, it's that a crackhead and a rich man tend to act differently, and thus play on different principles I hold.

I agree with you when looking for a significant other, but do you truly view everyone as equals?

from the homeless to warren buffet?
or the mentally retarded to the average individual?

It's easy to find superficial differences; variances in circumstance, character and ability. But it's more rewarding (in my experience) to try and see everyone as fundamental equals. We're all human being and none of us have any less inherent value. I try to see all people as small parts of a greater organism.

It seems like there are enough barriers between people as it is, and we don't really need to be putting up more on purpose.

It's easy to find superficial differences; variances in circumstance, character and ability. But it's more rewarding (in my experience) to try and see everyone as fundamental equals. We're all human being and none of us have any less inherent value. I try to see all people as small parts of a greater organism.

It seems like there are enough barriers between people as it is, and we don't really need to be putting up more on purpose.

As before I agree with you in principle however it is difficult in practice.

I try to see everyone as equals but there are many out there that I view as lower, or useless.

i.e. those that do not contribute to society in anyway.

I have a funny but not so funny story about women's emotions.

Last week, I actually broke my fiance by completely destroying her ability to control me in any shape or form.

Women thrive on emotional stimulus. Their lives are run on it, and if you come at them with irrefutable logic that crushes mind games, you can break them down to nothing. My fiance actually begged me to stop cause she couldn't handle it. It sounds funny, but it was rather sad. They need it, like a crack head needs crack. Most women are emotionally abused all of their life, since they are very sensitive. The side effect of this is that they don't know how to deal without abuse. They react on how you abuse them. They'll all deny it, but they don't know how to be anything but weak.

Feminism stems from women hating things about themselves. They fight cause they know they're the underdog. Really, women are nothing, and have no power at all unless men enable them. Most guys, if they really wanted to, could beat a women to the point where she'd never leave the home. Men gave women the right to vote. We give them protection. It's basically up to men as a whole to let women do anything, cause we have the full ability to crush those freedoms whenever we like. However, out of empathy we have given them some freedoms.

One thing women need, is to be sexually abused. Women love to be treated like a piece of meat. They actually like to be humiliated sexually, and even force fucked or mock raped. Basically, mock rape is when a girl women wants to fuck you but wants you to take it, just to clarify. Even the courts recognize and take into account this psychological trait in women. I've even had girls as young as 8, purposely create a situation, hoping I'd molest them. Of course I didn't, but it illustrates my point. It's actually quite simply why they do this; it's because they already have urges but are told they're not supposed to do things, so they hope you just do things to them so that they can experience them. Most girls will never even tell anyone about it, unless they are coerced to tell the police. It's one fucked up phenomenon that is taboo in our culture. I'm more than convinced that it's a genetic predisposition. Like black people loving chicken, it's true. My fiance loves it when I pin her down, call her a slut, and even choke her a little bit. Why do you think there isn't a shortage of porn stars?

Women love womanizers too. It shows them that they have a good man if he can nail lots of bitches, especially hot ones. Women love intense emotions like jealousy. Look at JFK, women loved him, even though he cheated with Marylin Monroe. How about Clinton and Bush, cheaters with devoted wives. Hell, I come from nobility, who randomly fucked serfs (commoners) at their leisure. These strong men fucking all these women are why white people rule the world. In Islam, they just have 4 wives if they're successful males. I'm so strong willed though, that I've turned down sex with hot women. My fiance must once again face that she probably isn't as resilient as me, so she got mad and called me a fag. She'd rather have me fuck some sluts, then feel bad that she has thoughts of cheating. Haven't you ever noticed that guys with women, seem to be able to attract women better.

However, there is a catch. You have to be stronger, both mentally and physically than your wife, or you'll never be able to get away with shit. She'll actually become the man in the relationship and will cheat on you, and humiliate you sexually, lol.

My theory is that this is an evolutionary trait to increase better breeding. Think about it. Weak men are dominated by cheating women. Those women cheat cause they're trying to fuck a genetically stronger man, to have stronger kids. However, they cling to the weaker man to ensure the child is raised. Stronger men who overpower their women can fuck all the bitches they want without losing the one that takes care of them. Through this, good breeding partners are able to breed, breaking through our cultural restrictions of exclusive partners. It's actually good for humanity. It's funny, we went from a system of nobility being able to fuck commoners, and their husbands having to raise the nobleman's child, to strong men, usually from ex-nobility fucking other men's <(ex-serfs) wives and them raising their illegitimate children. See, the world has never changed.

That's idealistic hippie talk.

We'll have none of that around here!

My theory is that this is an evolutionary trait to increase better breeding. Think about it. Weak men are dominated by cheating women. Those women cheat cause they're trying to fuck a genetically stronger man, to have stronger kids. However, they cling to the weaker man to ensure the child is raised. Stronger men who overpower their women can fuck all the bitches they want without losing the one that takes care of them.

This isn't exactly your theory. It's actually a relatively commonly understood theory.

But you will probably have tons of people try to discredit it (especially women and pussy-whipped male feminists). It's just too raw and "politically-incorrect" to be more widely accepted.

Most people are in denial of the fact that they are closely related to other animals, and that we share common ancestors. People don't like to admit that part of what drives them is motivated by predetermined genetic behavior.

Here is a PRIME example of a female who absolutely refuses to admit that she might just be part-animal:

http://www.totse.com/community/showthread.php?t=2122892

(Poster name: Dissed. She starts posting part way into the thread).

Really, I just figured that shit out the other day. I try to learn through experience, and observe how others interact.

I read a bit of it, pretty funny shit, thanks gadzooks. I guess I'm not alone in my thinking, which kind of points to the fact that it's probably correct if many people witness the same phenomenon.

I try to learn through experience, and observe how others interact.

That's good. That's very good. Unfortunately, most people don't even bother to reflect on what's happening around them.

The majority of what you said in your post just lines up perfectly with evolutionary theory, as well as with my own, and many other people's experiences and observations.

And, just so you know, it was also quite a relief for me to see your post as there are still LOTS of people out there who don't believe any of this, despite witnessing it with their own eyes.

So thank you. :)

Yeah, there aren't a lot of us out there anymore. Technically, people like us are actually the only sane people in the world, since sanity is essentially the undistorted recognition of the reality around us. However, we're classified as insane social outcasts because we are a minority. Quite honestly, it just makes it easier for us to become rich, get lots of pussy, and be happier. I like to believe that our abilities to see reality for how it is, is genetic evolution and we will inherit the earth.

Very well said!

I fully agree.

A superiority complex is sanity now?

Goodness gracious, I shall have to step up the self-aggrandizing.

I'd say being more aware of your surroundings definitely makes you superior to those who walk around like zombies in passive mode never bothering to reflect.

I'd say being more aware of your surroundings definitely makes you superior to those who walk around like zombies in passive mode never bothering to reflect.

I was referring to the idea of man's superiority over women.

I was referring to the idea of man's superiority over women.

I, personally, never said that men are necessarily superior. Physically stronger, yes.

But other than that, the traits don't necessarily imply any "superiority" over one another.

Male dominance and female submissiveness have nothing to do with one being superior to the other.

It's male and feminine. Yin and yang. Apples and oranges.

I, personally, never said that men are necessarily superior. Physically stronger, yes.

But other than that, the traits don't necessarily imply any "superiority" over one another.

Male dominance and female submissiveness have nothing to do with one being superior to the other.

It's male and feminine. Yin and yang. Apples and oranges.

I agree with that entirely. Men and women are two (read: very different) parts of a whole and cannot exist or function without one another.

But that's not what this easeoflife chap is going on about. Phrases like "they don't know how to be anything but weak" and "women are nothing, and have no power at all unless men enable them" come to mind. It's absurd to associate blatant misogyny with sanity.

I agree with that entirely. Men and women are two (read: very different) parts of a whole and cannot exist or function without one another.

But that's not what this easeoflife chap is going on about. Phrases like "they don't know how to be anything but weak" and "women are nothing, and have no power at all unless men enable them" come to mind. It's absurd to associate blatant misogyny with sanity.

Well, the general idea of his post was what I was agreeing with.

Maybe he did go a bit far with some of his assumptions. But when I look at the whole post as just one idea being expressed, then I agree with it.

I guess I can see how some of the phrasing/wording can come off as offensive though.

It wasn't meant to come across as misogynistic. I support equal rights for women, and love women dearly. In fact, they make life worth living, including their emotional complexities. Actually, they've been able to turn a weakness into a strength. My point was that men enable women to have equal rights. So basically, they're only equal if men recognize their equality. Men basically just have superior strength, and everything else is pretty much equal. This is important however, because it's a defining factor in mating rituals, as men take the dominance role over, and women take a submissive role, but both get what they want. However, there can be a role reversal as dominant women can make men submissive.

Really, the Alpha-males and Alpha-females have it best, and truly are superior in the overall population. The Alpha-male is essentially the top of the dominance ladder. Next is the Alpha-female, then the Beta-females, and lastly, Beta-males. Really, the Beta-males have it roughest, especially at the bottom of the Beta-male list.

The reason it works this way is how men and women differ in choosing mates. Men look for the most fertile women. First it's visual, then it's smell, and finally taste. If you look hot, we'll approach you. If you smell good we'll kiss you, and if you smell and taste good, it means you're genetically compatible, and healthy. We then subconsciously create an order in which we'd like to fuck those women.

Women do a similar thing, except they'll also look for extra characteristics like dominance. Usually this is tied to money and power, or potential for both.

Long story short, Beta-males get screwed because women will fuck and Alpha-male or a superior male essentially cheating. Beta-males are usually submissive and can't move up a notch from their partner and are less likely to cheat.

Ladies, if you want a faithful man, don't marry an Alpha, or prepare to look the other way. Sometimes its advantageous to look the other way.

I was referring to the idea of man's superiority over women.

For the sake of argument I will argue that men at their peak are more intelligent than women.


The proof, more male professors, more male scientists, more male doctors, physicists, mathmaticians, (lawyers and mba's don't count, by intelligence i'm looking at scientists)


It wasn't meant to come across as misogynistic. I support equal rights for women, and love women dearly. In fact, they make life worth living, including their emotional complexities. Actually, they've been able to turn a weakness into a strength. My point was that men enable women to have equal rights. So basically, they're only equal if men recognize their equality. Men basically just have superior strength, and everything else is pretty much equal. This is important however, because it's a defining factor in mating rituals, as men take the dominance role over, and women take a submissive role, but both get what they want. However, there can be a role reversal as dominant women can make men submissive.

Really, the Alpha-males and Alpha-females have it best, and truly are superior in the overall population. The Alpha-male is essentially the top of the dominance ladder. Next is the Alpha-female, then the Beta-females, and lastly, Beta-males. Really, the Beta-males have it roughest, especially at the bottom of the Beta-male list.

The reason it works this way is how men and women differ in choosing mates. Men look for the most fertile women. First it's visual, then it's smell, and finally taste. If you look hot, we'll approach you. If you smell good we'll kiss you, and if you smell and taste good, it means you're genetically compatible, and healthy. We then subconsciously create an order in which we'd like to fuck those women.

Women do a similar thing, except they'll also look for extra characteristics like dominance. Usually this is tied to money and power, or potential for both.

Long story short, Beta-males get screwed because women will fuck and Alpha-male or a superior male essentially cheating. Beta-males are usually submissive and can't move up a notch from their partner and are less likely to cheat.

Ladies, if you want a faithful man, don't marry an Alpha, or prepare to look the other way. Sometimes its advantageous to look the other way.

Your analysis forgets one case, alpha male and alpha female.

What if the alpha male in this case, is looking for an alpha female who also posesses characteristics of (money and power)?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjNNxnKVEpQ&feature=related

For the sake of argument I will argue that men at their peak are more intelligent than women.


The proof, more male professors, more male scientists, more male doctors, physicists, mathmaticians, (lawyers and mba's don't count, by intelligence i'm looking at scientists)

I think that there may be more educated men then women, but I don't know if we can judge that either gender is inherently more intelligent. I think the lack of educated women/female professionals has more to do with gender roles than capability; women are taught to be domestic and maternal, and society's definition of 'success' is different for men and women. A man is successful when he is respected and succeeding in his career, as well as making a lot of money. A woman is deemed successful when she has landed a mate and held on to him long enough to pop out a couple of babies. Therefore women don't ever bother to pursue academia, and even from an early age reject any studies that are not compulsory.

What if the alpha male in this case, is looking for an alpha female who also posesses characteristics of (money and power)?

Normal men do not care about a woman having money or power.

That would mean that the man is insecure or evil or has some other ulterior motive, thus making him no longer "alpha."

Besides, how many attractive, young females are out there that actually have their own money and power?

There's no arguing with the fact that there is a definite pecking order stemming from thousands of years of instinct and evolution. I agree with you entirely in this area.

But I hope you can understand why claims like "they don't know how to be anything but weak," "women need... to be sexually abused... treated like a piece of meat...to be humiliated sexually," and "women are nothing, and have no power at all unless men enable them," would come off as misogynist, as well as inflammatory. Because I just don't think that there is any inborn need for women to be degraded and abused. It just seems to me that someone who respects women like you say you do would not talk about them as thought they were underlings that need to be managed through systematic abuse.

Alpha-males usually have natural power. Money is good too, but not necessary to be an Alpha. Usually Alphas end up with money anyways. I wouldn't mind having a rich women, but I don't actively seek it.

Normal men do not care about a woman having money or power.

That would mean that the man is insecure or evil or has some other ulterior motive, thus making him no longer "alpha."

Besides, how many attractive, young females are out there that actually have their own money and power?

It would mean the man is a rational man. Observe, choice a beautiful chick or b beautiful chick with cash.

Which one do you choose?

I think that there may be more educated men then women, but I don't know if we can judge that either gender is inherently more intelligent. I think the lack of educated women/female professionals has more to do with gender roles than capability; women are taught to be domestic and maternal, and society's definition of 'success' is different for men and women. A man is successful when he is respected and succeeding in his career, as well as making a lot of money. A woman is deemed successful when she has landed a mate and held on to him long enough to pop out a couple of babies. Therefore women don't ever bother to pursue academia, and even from an early age reject any studies that are not compulsory.

Not true, the reason why men will always exceed women in most things is simple. Variance.
The best off and the worst off will almost always be men as there is more of a variance when it comes to men as opposed to women.

It would mean the man is a rational man. Observe, choice a beautiful chick or b beautiful chick with cash.

Which one do you choose?

Considering they're equal in EVERY OTHER way?

I guess the one with cash, because she'll be less likely to rely on me for stuff.

But generally, most guys don't even consider how much money a female makes. It's just such an insignificant decision.

Besides, no amount of cash can satisfy a woman. She could be a billionaire and still find a way to suck you dry... :p

Not true, the reason why men will always exceed women in most things is simple. Variance.
The best off and the worst off will almost always be men as there is more of a variance when it comes to men as opposed to women.

What the hell does that even mean? Can you clarify? Maybe provide some sort of evidence?

What the hell does that even mean? Can you clarify? Maybe provide some sort of evidence?

Look at income distributions among males and females.
Greater variance.
Look at level of education distributions among males and females.
Greater Variance.

What i'm trying to say is that men, on average tend to have more men at both extremes that is very rich and very poor, very educated, very uneducated, as opposed to females, which is much more concentrated in the center with respect to those two variables.

I don't have access to the statscan databases and tables (the ones you have to pay for ) at home, the next time im in my office i'll link you to the data.

Look at income distributions among males and females.
Greater variance.
Look at level of education distributions among males and females.
Greater Variance.

What i'm trying to say is that men, on average tend to have more men at both extremes that is very rich and very poor, very educated, very uneducated, as opposed to females, which is much more concentrated in the center with respect to those two variables.

I don't have access to the statscan databases and tables (the ones you have to pay for ) at home, the next time im in my office i'll link you to the data.

Well sure. But those factors aren't static; and they're explained by what I said before. Just because women don't seek higher education or professional careers as often as men, it doesn't mean they can't.

Well sure. But those factors aren't static; and they're explained by what I said before. Just because women don't seek higher education or professional careers as often as men, it doesn't mean they can't.

Sure it does, those that have the potential to do it, should be doing it. It goes along with the assumption of rationality that individuals would try to maximize their quality of life, as humans are generally risk averse, females more so than males, a truly rational or intelligent female would attain the highest level of education/earning power she can, if she chooses not to, it is because she views the present value of the benefits of the education worth less than the costs associated with doing so.

Which translates to
a) perception that the education is not valuable

b) education cannot be completed by this female at her current level of thinking/understanding

Bringing it back to my original argument that due to variance, men will always hold places at both extremes of the curve.

Very good thread.

In my experience though, it's not that women need to be emotionally abused, it's that they need to be emotionally excited. They feed on fluctuations in their emotions, not necessarily a regular dose of shame, humiliation, etc. In essence: Boredom = she's going to leave you, or cheat on you. Excitement = loyalty.

You don't have to treat a woman poorly to keep her, you just have to play with her. You wouldn't believe the joy you can bring to a woman by letting her know that you know ALL her buttons and exactly how to press them to get any reaction from her...but you are good enough of a man to not destroy her with such intimate knowledge. It's a level of trust that exceeds the co-dependence that easeoflife22 was talking about. It breeds genuine loyalty rather than crippling reliance upon the man.

Sure...if you really think that, my guess is that you're a very lonely person. You probably get laid a fair deal, but have no real emotional depth in your life. Your inner temple is a wasteland of bitterness and contempt for your mother, with an unhealthy urge to dominate women to carry out a foolish vengeance you should have let go a long time ago.

Just so you know, buddy, every woman isn't your mother. Good ones do exist. Really good ones.

And chances are, you're just being a little bitch about whatever resentment it is you so strongly carry against your mother. Did she spank you? Drink too much? Cheat on daddy? Let the shit go so you can enjoy women. They're worth having around.

Haha...I have no problems with my mother. I love her very much and I respect her a lot. I'm not a lonely or bitter person. I'm very cheerful and happy with life.

Yes good women exist, but my idea is probably different than yours. To me, a good woman is a pretty one who understands that I don't want to listen to her retarded bullshit and I'm not going to pretend to care.

Yes good women exist, but my idea is probably different than yours. To me, a good woman is a pretty one who understands that I don't want to listen to her retarded bullshit and I'm not going to pretend to care.

They understand your situation, they just don't care. ;)

Women aren't confusing, and they're only as annoying as you let them be. I love being around women, they're extremely entertaining and captivating. Read some books on behavioral psychology.

http://education-portal.com/articles/Leaving_Men_Behind:_Women_Go_to_College_in_Ever-Greater_Numbers.html

http://education-portal.com/articles/Leaving_Men_Behind:_Women_Go_to_College_in_Ever-Greater_Numbers.html

. No matter how the numbers are cut, men still earn more than their female counterparts, even when controlling for age, college major and professional field.

Pwned.

Pwned.

I was only trying to point out that the ones saying women dont go to school and hold less "high positions" than men is changing.

Even the salary gap is closing too, I think. Personally, I'd like to see more in-depth salary studies, that take into account work hours and whatnot. Do men make more because they're men, or because they simply work more hours?

Do men make more because they're men, or because they simply work more hours?

You mean do men make more money because they're men, or do they make more money because men are naturally more hardworking and resilient than women and thus worked more hours? It's the same damn thing, really.

You mean do men make more money because they're men, or do they make more money because men are naturally more hardworking and resilient than women and thus worked more hours? It's the same damn thing, really.

No, I meant "Do men make more because they're men, or because they simply work more hours?"

No, I meant "Do men make more because they're men, or because they simply work more hours?"

Then why didn't you just say that in the first place?

Then why didn't you just say that in the first place?

I just read the last couple posts...and if I'm not mistaken, that's the exact question he asked.

But I think it's important to remember that even though women are seeking education and getting better jobs, they're still working as wives and mothers. I think it's safe to say that the majority or couples raising children still rely on the wife to manage a greater share of domestic and childrearing responsibilities. I'd imagine it would limit your ability to work overtime when you've got to run a household in addition to holding a full time job.

Men make more money because men are more aggressive and less submissive. If my boss didn't want to pay me a fair wage, I'd make threats to leave, and then leave if I don't get it. Women are more likely to passively complain, but not really get fuck all done. Where I live, this is very apparent as unions which are predominately male, strike better contracts, through more persuasive and effective methods, while majority female unions are barely making above minimum wage.

QFT!5

Women aren't confusing, and they're only as annoying as you let them be. I love being around women, they're extremely entertaining and captivating. Read some books on behavioral psychology.

I don't mean that completely, but half the time they are confusing and I mean that it's annoying that they are confusing like that.