i saw this while browsing the newspaper today.
http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/1578/roflpaperur2.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

That was totally worth a thread.

Not completely untrue, to be frank...

Weed WAS on average much less potent back then (according to my dad... lol.).

I guess the point you're trying to make is that people try to present information that weed is "not the same drug as it was during the Love Generation"? A very untrue notion, no doubt.

The thing that pisses me off about that is that there were always alternatives to the low-potency marijuana; such as hash, oil, and thai sticks...

Ridiculous propaganda.

They word it like its a plague infesting the youth. Those assholes.

38 percent thc my ass. I think the highest is 22% i forgot what strain it is, but last i heard about a year 22% thc is the highest.

I don't see why should matter even if it is true. If anything, it would mean marijuana is generally safer, since if it's 10 times more potent, then you only would need to smoke 1/10th as much which would be much less harsh on your lungs.

but see they dont view this as a good thing, they make it seem like its more dangerous

i hate how people think thats a bad thing.

the more thc %, the better, because you have to smoke less, thus consuming less tar and carcinogens.

That was good for the lulz.