|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
register |
bbs |
search |
rss |
faq |
about
|
 |
 |
meet up |
add to del.icio.us |
digg it
|
 |
 |
| Spurious Generalities This is the general discussion and chat forum. People can discuss just about anything they want to in this area, providing it doesn't fit in one of the other forums and provided that it will bring conversation to the thread. |
 |
|
# 1

2008-03-09, 02:08
|
|
Regular
|
|
9th circle, round 4 of hell
|
|
The Rules
Quote:
Originally Posted by XiPPiLLi
These regulations will be considered, and failure to comply with these rules will result in an infraction or an automatic ban.
- We expect your threads to begin with a minimum of two content filled sentences that inspire converstation or debate.
Things that are not allowed are:
---Single word/phrase threads.
-"Discuss"
-"Read topic title"
-"Post"
---Single sentence threads.
-"I'm so pissed! Grr!"
-"I just had breakfast. (Followed by pictures)"
-"What are your thoughts on the subject?"
---Threads with no valid initial content for discussion.
-"I am typing in this thread. You should try it!"
-"Look outside! Do you see what I see?!"
-"When this page gets to (X) pages, I will (Y)"
- We require that posting in SG means considering several key points as to the understanding of the forum:
Consider:
---It is the role of the moderation team to decide what belongs and does not belong in the forum, and NOT the role of the regulars.
---It is the role of the moderation team to decide whether a misplaced thread should be moved or closed. As such, it is also their decision whether a thread not following these guidelines should be closed or deleted, and whether or not the offending user gets penalized.
---It is the role of the thread starter to engage the conversation, not the users replying.
---Your username cannot be Slag.
---These regulations apply to the first post in a thread, or the 'thread-starting' post, and not to the replies following, unless it were a deliberate tampering by the thread starter.
These rules are a cooperative decision by the moderation team. The rules can and will change at any time without prior notice. It is the right and privilege of the moderation team to enforce these regulations to the best of their judgment, both as a whole and individually.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by XiPPiLLi
If a thread starter started a conversation like:
"So hey, I was watching the news the other day, and I wanted to know you guys' opinions on the big blaming deal of the V-Tech shootings." And then posted "LOL JUS KIDDING META IS NAZI MOD OMG FEGGIT!!111" soon after, it would be against the regulations and constitute an infraction as spam.
If a thread starter started a thread that violated a regulation, then afterwards tried to begin a legitimate conversation, the thread still would not be valid, since it goes with the 'thread-starting' post.
If a thread started began a thread with "LOL Y U STAB ME", and someone else posted "IB4L" after it, it wouldnt matter, since the "IB4L" post was a reply.
Make more sense?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by XiPPiLLi
You can DISCUSS what you want here in SG, not just say it.
Its a difference betweeen a thread that reads "I'm tired." and a thread that reads "So I had to pull a double shift today because my asshole co-worker decided not to come in. Apparently he's sick, but I saw him with his girlfriend as I was coming to work today. So now, because of his dumbassery, I'm tired. Does anyone else have this happen?"
Save the single sentences for Half Baked.
|
Thread went past ten pages, so Im doing the mods a favor by amking a new one and adding the content. Sticky as you see fit.
Last edited by sybil; 2008-03-24 at 00:17.
Reason: update
|
# 2

2008-03-09, 02:09
|
|
|
Re: The Rules
Bantard.
|
# 3

2008-03-09, 02:12
|
|
Regular
|
|
9th circle, round 4 of hell
|
|
Re: The Rules
Quote:
Originally Posted by XiPPiLLi
Actually, I should clarify.
If a thread starter started a conversation like:
"So hey, I was watching the news the other day, and I wanted to know you guys' opinions on the big blaming deal of the V-Tech shootings." And then posted "LOL JUS KIDDING META IS NAZI MOD OMG FEGGIT!!111" soon after, it would be against the regulations and constitute an infraction as spam.
If a thread starter started a thread that violated a regulation, then afterwards tried to begin a legitimate conversation, the thread still would not be valid, since it goes with the 'thread-starting' post.
If a thread started began a thread with "LOL Y U STAB ME", and someone else posted "IB4L" after it, it wouldnt matter, since the "IB4L" post was a reply.
Make more sense?
|
update
|
# 4

2008-03-09, 02:13
|
|
Regular
|
|
Memento Mori
|
|
Re: The Rules
sry d00d, u got bant for cl0ne thred
|
# 5

2008-03-09, 02:15
|
|
Regular
|
|
Utah: Mountains, Mormons, Meth
|
|
Re: The Rules
|
# 6

2008-03-09, 02:17
|
|
Regular
|
|
9th circle, round 4 of hell
|
|
Re: The Rules
update:
Quote:
Originally Posted by XiPPiLLi
You can DISCUSS what you want here in SG, not just say it.
Its a difference betweeen a thread that reads "I'm tired." and a thread that reads "So I had to pull a double shift today because my asshole co-worker decided not to come in. Apparently he's sick, but I saw him with his girlfriend as I was coming to work today. So now, because of his dumbassery, I'm tired. Does anyone else have this happen?"
Save the single sentences for Half Baked.
|
|
# 7

2008-03-09, 02:24
|
|
Regular
|
|
9th circle, round 4 of hell
|
|
Re: The Rules
Quote:
Originally Posted by nshanin
|
no its not
|
# 8

2008-03-09, 02:36
|
|
|
Re: The Rules
Fine.
I SEE HOW IT IS.

|
# 9

2008-03-09, 03:05
|
|
Regular
|
|
Utah: Mountains, Mormons, Meth
|
|
Re: The Rules
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_coup_d'etat
no its not
|
Yes it is too.

|
# 10

2008-03-09, 03:08
|
|
Regular
|
|
Arbiter Of Perversions
|
|
Re: The Rules
Bactrians are the niggers of the camel world.
Find some hot dromedary-on-dromedary action, please.
|
# 11

2008-03-09, 03:09
|
|
Regular
|
|
Wonderland
|
|
Re: The Rules
Rules, schmools.
|
# 12

2008-03-09, 03:11
|
|
Regular
|
|
Utah: Mountains, Mormons, Meth
|
|
Re: The Rules
Quote:
Originally Posted by robinhoody
Bactrians are the niggers of the camel world.
Find some hot dromedary-on-dromedary action, please.
|
Don't tell me you've never fapped to Black porn.
|
# 13

2008-03-09, 03:24
|
|
Regular
|
|
9th circle, round 4 of hell
|
|
Re: The Rules
Quote:
Originally Posted by nshanin
Yes it is too.

|
no it isn't. *looks through old thread for moar rules.
|
# 14

2008-03-09, 04:17
|
|
Regular
|
|
Utah: Mountains, Mormons, Meth
|
|
Re: The Rules
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_coup_d'etat
no it isn't. *looks through old thread for moar rules.
|
I'm sorry, I do believe it is.
http://www.threesources.com/pix/christmas-camel.jpg
|
# 15

2008-03-09, 04:56
|
|
|
Re: The Rules
|
# 16

2008-03-09, 05:03
|
|
Regular
|
|
9th circle, round 4 of hell
|
|
Re: The Rules
Quote:
Originally Posted by 449
|
no you haven't got it right yet. it is a wonder you have not be banned.
|
# 17

2008-03-09, 05:31
|
|
|
Re: The Rules
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_coup_d'etat
no you haven't got it right yet. it is a wonder you have not be banned.
|
And for what should I be banned for?
|
# 18

2008-03-09, 06:58
|
|
|
Re: The Rules
Quote:
Originally Posted by robinhoody
Bactrians are the niggers of the camel world.
Find some hot dromedary-on-dromedary action, please.
|
Don't be a racist.
|
# 19

2008-03-09, 08:02
|
|
|
Re: The Rules
|
# 20

2008-03-09, 09:40
|
|
|
Re: The Rules
Page 1!
|
# 21

2008-03-09, 10:20
|
|
|
Re: The Rules
Come as you are, as you were as you wanted to be...
|
# 22

2008-03-09, 15:45
|
|
Regular
|
|
Utah: Mountains, Mormons, Meth
|
|
Re: The Rules
Quote:
Originally Posted by 449
And for what should I be banned for?
|
Spamming the shit out of this forum.
|
# 23

2008-03-09, 16:51
|
|
Regular
|
|
NY-2005
|
|
Re: The Rules
Quote:
Originally Posted by ComradeAsh
Come as you are, as you were, as I wanted you to be...
|
Fix'd cuz you're a fucken idiot.
|
# 24

2008-03-11, 05:41
|
|
Regular
|
|
Canada
|
|
Re: The Rules
Quote:
Originally Posted by 449
|
I want to fuck her through her shorts.
|
# 25

2008-03-11, 17:28
|
|
|
Re: The Rules
Quote:
Originally Posted by nshanin
Spamming the shit out of this forum.
|
What on earth are you talking about? I rarely post!
|
# 26

2008-03-11, 18:16
|
|
Regular
|
|
9th circle, round 4 of hell
|
|
Re: The Rules
Quote:
Originally Posted by 449
What on earth are you talking about? I rarely post!
|
Wait one.
|
# 27

2008-03-19, 02:32
|
|
|
Re: The Rules
Thats not what your momma said
|
# 28

2008-03-19, 03:57
|
|
|
Re: The Rules
Quote:
Originally Posted by robinhoody
Bactrians are the niggers of the camel world.
Find some hot dromedary-on-dromedary action, please.
|
I lol'ed.
|
# 29

2008-03-21, 16:27
|
|
|
Re: The Rules
Quote:
Originally Posted by xilikeeggs0
I lol'ed.
|
NOBODY FUCKEN ASKED YOU IF YOU LIKE EGGS SO SHUT THE FUCK UP  
|
# 30

2008-03-21, 21:36
|
|
Regular
|
|
Memento Mori
|
|
Re: The Rules
I pronounce her name as " zee i like eggz".
|
# 31

2008-05-21, 00:42
|
|
|
Re: The Rules
wtf fuck this bullshit. what happend to the olde totse where we post and talk about anything we want.. thats what made totse, what it is, not these bullshit fucken rules.
fuck you mods.
|
# 32

2008-05-21, 00:44
|
|
|
Re: The Rules
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zay
Totse lasted for over a decade with better discussion without these stupid-ass rules. The site is older than half the posters The mods can suck my dick. Any mod that doesnt chuckle at the last sentence can doubly suck my dick. You're not hot shit because you can modify some pixels online. The totse I joined promotes free speech and we dont need a fucking codebook to tell the difference between valid discussion and spam.
the_coup is a complete tool for thinking that pretentious heap of garbage was worth reciting in a new thread. Anyone condoning it should set their account email to a random string of letters and numbers to deactivate their account and go join a more moderated website.
|
zing!
|
# 33

2008-05-21, 17:52
|
|
|
Re: The Rules
Yeah!
|
# 34

2008-05-24, 08:58
|
|
Regular
|
|
within
|
|
Re: The Rules
GARnaHARHARpandiHARBARCARSHAR!
|
# 35

2008-05-25, 12:34
|
|
Regular
|
|
Catch the next train
|
|
Re: The Rules
Right on!!!
Also, OP is fucking faggot.
|
# 36

2008-05-29, 21:49
|
|
Regular
|
|
Basement
|
|
Re: The Rules
449=steve-o
Quote:
Originally Posted by mario_luigi_peach
Right on!!!
Also, OP is fucking faggot.
|
why don't you like robinhoody?
|
# 37

2008-05-31, 08:56
|
|
|
Re: The Rules
Lets hurry this along to page four, I'm sick of those camel balls. 
|
# 38

2008-05-31, 09:04
|
|
Regular
|
|
Memento Mori
|
|
Re: The Rules
|
# 39

2008-05-31, 12:26
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Great Britain
|
|
Re: The Rules
Alright, this has gone so far off track it's not worth it anymore.
-deus-
|
This thread continued for 10 pages in the real archive, 99 posts total - only pages 1, 2, 3, 10 survived here.
| Thread Tools |
 Show Printable Version
 Email this Page
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
 Switch to Hybrid Mode
 Switch to Threaded Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
To the best of our knowledge, the text on this page may be freely reproduced and distributed.

totse.com certificate signatures
|
 |
 |
About | Community | Bad Ideas | Drugs | Ego | Erotica | Fringe | Society | Technology
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|