Its a question that crossed my mind for some strange reason. Since love knows no boundaries, which is why homosexual sex is now politically accepted, shouldn't incest also be politically accepted? I mean love knows no boundaries right?

And for the much hates phrase on totse....discuss.

EDIT: Most people were thinking parent/child, but I is actually referring to sister/sister or brother/brother. Anyone now see the validity of the question?

inb4block lulz

inb4block lulz

This.

http://www.lolwut.com/layout/lolwut.jpg

inb4block lulz

Quit it its a serious question.

If homosexual actions are ok, why isn't homosexual incest ok? Incest isn't ok because it's unnatural because it causes retard babies. But since homosexual incest doesn't cause retard babies or anything, and can't be any more natural then homosexuality, is it ok? Or is homosexuality unnatural?

EDIT: This could very well prove homosexuality to be unnatural. Lets keep this thread going!

http://www.lolwut.com/layout/lolwut.jpg


This.

Same reason as drugs are illegal.

S'bad for society.

Don't stop it being fun though ;).

I'm going for no.

No, it's not okay.

Also, inb4lock.

But if homosexuality isn't deemed for bad society, how would incest homosexuality be deemed bad for society?

Comeon guys, cut the "inb4lock" BS. This is a serious question that could revolutionize the way we look at gays and/or incest.

Incest isnt wrong because it produces retarded babies. It does, but thats not why its wrong.

It's wrong because the parent is abusing a relationship in which the child is 100% dependant on the parent. Any sexual relationship under these conditions are considered a gross abuse of power. For example, when a professor/teacher sleeps with a student. Even one thats 18. Or when a police officer takes advantage of his position to sort of blackmail a woman he pulls over. The parent/child relationship is the epitome of this betrayal.

I changed my mind. This, instead.

Does incest actually make retarded babies then? I always dismissed it as a rumor.

Except you're only taking the parental case into consideration. What about sibling homosexual incest? I can't see how a power relationship is involved (unless there's a massive gulf, age-wise).

Short answer yes
Long answer Mostly

Quit it its a serious question.

If homosexual actions are ok, why isn't homosexual incest ok? Incest isn't ok because it's unnatural because it causes retard babies. But since homosexual incest doesn't cause retard babies or anything, and can't be any more natural then homosexuality, is it ok? Or is homosexuality unnatural?

EDIT: This could very well prove homosexuality to be unnatural. Lets keep this thread going!

What the fuck are you talking about? Fucking idiots...

Incest doesn't have to be Parent/Child. Twins anyone?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9iuu_j67I2U

If you can watch that without feeling the urge to vomit, then totse really has made you immune. Or you're a flaming homo!

Lol, that is not his brother.

Lol, that is not his brother.
Of course not, but I still find it quite repulsive, even just staged.

Incest doesn't have to be Parent/Child. Twins anyone?

Oh that's why everyone misunderstood me! I was thinking sister/sister brother/brother, not parent/child. Does anyone see the validity of the question now?

Except you're only taking the parental case into consideration. What about sibling homosexual incest? I can't see how a power relationship is involved (unless there's a massive gulf, age-wise).

Pretty much. If they're the same age-ish, and theres not some creepy older uncle egging them on for the camera, then theres nothing wrong with it.

Experimentation is actually quite normal, if not healthy. I'm sure it takes place a lot with brothers/sisters around the same age. But it's just that, experimentation. Theres still a much deeper relationship there, so it's probably a little wierd if they end up continuing a sexual relationship much longer then puberty.


And to whoever asked, it doesn't exactly create deformed babies. It's just that you've only got one gene pool to pick from. So any genetic weaknesses/defects are amplified somewhat, because theres no second pair of genes to cover the gaps.

Its a question that crossed my mind for some strange reason. Since love knows no boundaries, which is why homosexual sex is now politically accepted, shouldn't incest also be politically accepted?

Hey... as long as it's outside the legal position of parent or permanent caretaker... keep it in the family all you want - homoerotic, heteroerotic, necroerotic, whatever everyone's down with.

It's not the government's decision, and it's not your neighbor's decision.

Hey... as long as it's outside the legal position of parent or permanent caretaker... keep it in the family all you want - homoerotic, heteroerotic, necroerotic, whatever everyone's down with.

It's not the government's decision, and it's not your neighbor's decision.

Agreed. People who accept homosexuality out of supposed tolerance, but not incest, beastiality, etc. are just being hypocrites.

To the OP: NO!

Agreed. People who accept homosexuality out of supposed tolerance, but not incest, beastiality, etc. are just being hypocrites.

No. Condoning one thing does not inherently mean that you should condone something else related. Just because I don't see anything wrong with homosexuality doesn't make me a hypocrite for thinking it is wrong for guy's to fuck sheep.

No. Condoning one thing does not inherently mean that you should condone something else related. Just because I don't see anything wrong with homosexuality doesn't make me a hypocrite for thinking it is wrong for guy's to fuck sheep.

What if you just held your cock out and the sheep mounted it, then went back and forth on it? Wouldn't that be consentual beastality? Is that accepted then?

Um...no. To everything above, and the OP.

Incest is seen as a parent abusing their position of authority or power over the child.

And can I ask why you'd want to have sex with a sheep, when you can get real pussy easily enough?

Did anyone ever hear about a brother and sister in germany fighting for the right to marry? They have had a couple of children, who both were disabled.

They didn't actually know they were related when they got together. Something that only came up later on. I can't remember the exact details. Anyone remember this? it is recentish.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmdQ6filN1g

Yeah, I saw it. Personally, I have nothing against their relationship, but I think they really should have adopted, not that they could, what with their relationship being illegal. It's kinda tragic, the guy had to go to jail for a while.

I have no problem with it, but when they have children it can really screw things up. It can really endanger the offspring, increased chance of a lot of diseases.

Read the topic before you post moron. It's not about parental incest.

What if you just held your cock out and the sheep mounted it, then went back and forth on it? Wouldn't that be consentual beastality? Is that accepted then?

That would never happen. Next thing the guy is going to say is that he was whacking off in a field, saw a wolf started running and "accidentally" fell dick first into his horse.

Um...no. To everything above, and the OP.

Incest is seen as a parent abusing their position of authority or power over the child.

And can I ask why you'd want to have sex with a sheep, when you can get real pussy easily enough?

Maybe they like sheep....sexually?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmdQ6filN1g

Yeah, I saw it. Personally, I have nothing against their relationship, but I think they really should have adopted, not that they could, what with their relationship being illegal. It's kinda tragic, the guy had to go to jail for a while.

Lol, that girl looks fucking uncomfortable.

Look you idiots whatever two consenting adults want to do is fine as long as they keep the nasty bits indoors like heteros. Incest between male/female is wrong because a child could be born of it and that takes it out of being two consenting adults. If two brothers or two sisters that are 18 years of age want to mount each other why not?

Now i'm not saying we shouldn't be able to call them fags or unnatural freaks or anything, just that they should have equal rights too and whatever your personal opinion they should have all laws, rights, protections like an American should.

Now i'm not saying we shouldn't be able to call them fags or unnatural freaks or anything

So your justifying they're relationship, but you still want to call them freaks?

Maybe it's like a double negative.

Or.

Give it a shot and find out.


(I couldn't decide)

So your justifying they're relationship, but you still want to call them freaks?

They're is a contraction meaning they are.
Their is a possesive pronoun.

Your call though.

So your justifying they're relationship, but you still want to call them freaks?

It's possible to be against something, but support freedom anyway.

At least in America you should be able to hold whatever view that you wish and be able to live it and speak it as long as it dosen't intefere with anyone else. If you catcall at random homos "FAGGOTS" with your 5 trailer park trash babies in tow that's one thing i'm not for. But you should be able to talk and say whatever you want about them with your buddies over a beer on your own time in public. So you think faggots should be imprisoned and put into concentration camps? Hey that's all right with me as long as no one actually tramples anyones right.

The law should be seperate thing and above human bias. My own personal opinion has nothing to do with this by the way and I haven't said anything for or against, carry on wanting to ban things you personally don't like though.

It's not as wrong as incest looking at it by the consequences, but I would say it's more morally wrong. And a bit awkward if you adopt some kids and they have two daddies/mommies who are siblings. It isn't as bad as having your offspring getting into genealogy and finding out their family tree branches crossed though.

http://www.lolwut.com/layout/lolwut.jpg

I'm still quoting myself.

Maybe it's like a double negative.


Two wrongs don't make a right.

we're all from adam and eve

No. Condoning one thing does not inherently mean that you should condone something else related. Just because I don't see anything wrong with homosexuality doesn't make me a hypocrite for thinking it is wrong for guy's to fuck sheep.

Why do you think homosexuality is ok and why do you think sheep-fucking isn't?

we're all from adam and eve
Yes, but they let God videotape it so he said it was ok. :)

ya i saw that video. theres rope and shit

Why do you think homosexuality is ok and why do you think sheep-fucking isn't?


They're far from alike, first off....

They're far from alike, first off....

What if the man's really hairy?