http://www.totse.com/community/showthread.php?t=2039859

We got these kind of threads every so often. In this particular case the girl looked underage and so I had no choice but to delete the pics ( Sometimes I hate this job!). There were lots of vag close ups and dildo action.

But in general is there a reason to forbid/edit/close such threads? As much as I dislike them I really can't think of one unless the girl is a minor or a member of totse.

Thoughts?

Super mods, a ruling?

I'd have imagined that with it being underage porn, then it is forbidden, as for others that post naked pictures without permission of the people involved...Is that not against some sort of law?

I believe it is against laws in some places.

rab,bangbang yes I'd assume it is against the law most places but I'm not sure. I'm hoping Jeff will give me a ruling on this as I assume he knows the law on this where he is.

As much as it might be morally reprehensible I don't want to be deleting things just because they personally upset me.

At the very least in future i will ask that such pix not be [img] but [url] 'd. Same as I do for dead baby type things.

mind reposting the pix here :p j/k...or am I...

LOl...and what makes you think I would have kept a copy of links to possible kiddy porn ?! *cough*

LOl...and what makes you think I would have kept a copy of links to possible kiddy porn ?! *cough*

make me think!? I really didn't have to think about the FACT that you made copies :p héhé

LOl...and what makes you think I would have kept a copy of links to possible kiddy porn ?! *cough*

You're Jackketch.



Anyway, I'd have thought if someone was posting pictures of an ex or whoever else against their will and that ex found the pictures, they could bring alot of wrath and hellfire down on totse.

I'd close threads like that if they were simply revenge threads with no discussion value.

EDIT:
Also, what of beastiality threads?

There's no reason for threads like that to be on totse. There aren't enough porn outlets on the internet?

I edit out nudes that others post of themselves too, regardless of attractiveness, when I notice them.

For a quick example, captian_kirk recently posted a closeup of herself; she's 16. Although, such pictures go nicely with her talk of forcing her dog to eat her out, I'm left believing that there are better outlets for naked pictures if she'd like them on the internet.

I MISSED a naked pic of captain_kirk???!!!

It is a sadder, darker and cold worlder we live in.

I MISSED a naked pic of captain_kirk???!!!

It is a sadder, darker and cold worlder we live in.


You poor, poor man, I get a new one almost every day ^_^

You poor, poor man, I get a new one almost every day ^_^

I hope you get the cancer and it turns black and drops off ! :P

But what do you think about question at hand?

But what do you think about question at hand?


I'm not sure, I gotta think about this one..

The server is hosted on US soil, therefore it is subject to US laws. Its better to delete highly questionable material than allow it to stay.

Same thing with links to copyrighted materials.

I edit out nudes that others post of themselves too, regardless of attractiveness, when I notice them.

For a quick example, captian_kirk recently posted a closeup of herself; she's 16. Although, such pictures go nicely with her talk of forcing her dog to eat her out, I'm left believing that there are better outlets for naked pictures if she'd like them on the internet.Being the pervert that I am, I read this and immediately set out to find the thread in question.

I realize you edited/deleted kirk's post with her lady parts, but I noticed that another member had taken said picture (or rather, what I assume was the picture, based on the image names) and created one of those giant grid images of it that is still up: *warning: possible child porn* https://www.totse.com/community/showpost.php?p=8739444&postcount=29

Or is that not the picture that was deleted?

The fuck is that?

The fuck is that?
http://images.buycostumes.com/mgen/merchandiser/17166.jpg
I may need to run some tests, but I believe it is a vagina.

Or a dead turkey, perhaps.

http://images.buycostumes.com/mgen/merchandiser/17166.jpg
I may need to run some tests, but I believe it is a vagina.

That's just made my night.

Yeah that caught me off guard and I spit my cig out from laughing so hard.

As to the question at hand, I am in agreement with Euda on this.

See? There is something we can agree upon! :D

There's always something.

Yes, that was the picture; that copy is gone now too. HB alerted me to it as they were making a collage.

There's a website that makes those collages.

As much as it takes the fun out of everything (and yes, it does take the fun out of everything), I'd so no on the naked picture revenge threads. It does violate many laws that could get Totse in trouble. It can fit under the don't post personal information rule we have.

So I guess we can remove the pictures but cant really infract a repeat offender for such things?

Totally unacceptable and a form of personal info.

Why the fuck does nobody post nudes in GP?

-deus-

Exactly.

I don't think I'd want to see anyone that post in the forums I mod nude, well maybe Infectedgoose, only so I can blackmail him into designing me a new guitar.

Muwahahahaha

and a form of personal info.

Not really an 'offence' against the rules though unless she's a member:

Privacy violation: Posted another user's real name or personal info or picture

Which is why I'm looking for a ruling from Jeff/Forum Admins.

Which is why I'm looking for a ruling from Jeff/Forum Admins.

You're a moderator because they trust your judgment, as misguided as that may seem.

Make a choice and run with it.

Not really an 'offence' against the rules though unless she's a member:





There are two privacy infractions, the other one says nothing about another user.

And like Euda said, we are Mods because we are trusted to make the hard calls.

Not really an 'offence' against the rules though unless she's a member:



Which is why I'm looking for a ruling from Jeff/Forum Admins.

In that case, if its borderline then I go the way of legality.

There are two privacy infractions, the other one says nothing about another user.

And like Euda said, we are Mods because we are trusted to make the hard calls.

Just checked and yep 'personal info' will cover it (has Jeff changed that one recently?!).

Thanks for pointing that out.

You guys are no fun.

You guys are no fun.

5char

To be perfectly honest, all this naked pics for revenge thing is...Well, lame!

I hate seeing threads with pics of people other than the members' pics thread..."Would you do this chick?"..."Would you do me?!"...So on and so forth.

Besides, a lot of our regular users are teenagers and doing chicks who are underage (18 is the minimum age of consent for nekkid pics!) and I really don't wanna be looking at the not-yet-properly-formed vaginal canal of a teenager!

But that's just my opinion.

I really don't wanna be looking at the not-yet-properly-formed vaginal canal of a teenager!Lies...