|
|
 |
|
|
|
register |
bbs |
search |
rss |
faq |
about
|
|
|
meet up |
add to del.icio.us |
digg it
|
|
|
| Green Planet Environmental issues. The ozone hole. Tree hugging for fun and profit. Toxins in the air, water, and soil. Biotechnological foodstuffs. |
 |
|
|
#1
 2007-07-02, 01:37 |
optl 
Regular
|
|
|
|
 Interesting Global Climate Change Argument
Full first post recovered from the forum's own RSS feed - reply count unknown.
PWN your dumb friends with this video.
What do you guys think? I think it could really help resolve this huge debate. Might as well just prepare for the worst. |
|
#2
2007-07-02, 14:41 |
|
Regular
|
|
Canberra Australia
|
|
Re: Interesting Global Climate Change Argument
Well I'm on dial up and therefore won't open this up. As soon as someone says it's just a stupid rant or something along those lines tis will be moved to IFIOTW or when I get to see it.
...or until Deus decides he wants to do something with this
Orrrrr if it's a legitimate Green Planet thread it stays of course :p
|
|
#3
2007-07-02, 17:11 |
optl
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: Interesting Global Climate Change Argument
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Trousersnake
Well I'm on dial up and therefore won't open this up. As soon as someone says it's just a stupid rant or something along those lines tis will be moved to IFIOTW or when I get to see it.
...or until Deus decides he wants to do something with this
Orrrrr if it's a legitimate Green Planet thread it stays of course :p
|
The video has a global warming argument, its not very long. |
|
#4
2007-07-02, 18:14 |
|
|
Re: Interesting Global Climate Change Argument
It can stay here.
I understand his reasoning, however it's not really a simple choice between column A and B, acting and not acting.
In the real world, we can't possibly do everything. So we still have to decide, should we choose to act, in what way?
We also have to factor fossil fuel supply. Even if we pick column B and keep going as we are in spite of global warming, we physically can't. We won't be able to net release CO2 forever since we won't have non-renewables to burn.
-deus-
|
|
#5
2007-07-02, 23:06 |
optl
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: Interesting Global Climate Change Argument
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by deus-redux
It can stay here.
I understand his reasoning, however it's not really a simple choice between column A and B, acting and not acting.
In the real world, we can't possibly do everything. So we still have to decide, should we choose to act, in what way?
We also have to factor fossil fuel supply. Even if we pick column B and keep going as we are in spite of global warming, we physically can't. We won't be able to net release CO2 forever since we won't have non-renewables to burn.
-deus-
|
thats true, but still what he is saying is valid |
|
#6
2007-07-02, 23:47 |
|
|
Re: Interesting Global Climate Change Argument
Who needs risk analysis when you've got a marker pen and a blank board.
|
|
#7
2007-07-03, 00:21 |
|
Regular
|
|
Canberra Australia
|
|
Re: Interesting Global Climate Change Argument
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Slave of the Beast
Who needs risk analysis when you've got a marker pen and a blank board.
|
lol
And who needs question marks |
|
|
|
To the best of our knowledge, the text on this page may be freely reproduced and distributed.
totse.com certificate signatures
|
|
|
About | Community | Bad Ideas | Drugs | Ego | Erotica | Fringe | Society | Technology
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]()
![]()
|
