After countless documentaries and exposes on how its simply impossible to fit a 757 into the hole that was created at the pentagon it is my belief that a scaled down model of a 757 was built and packed with explosives and used. This would explain why witnesses claim to have seen a passenger jet, your average citizen has little to no knowledge about aviation and ground to air distances.

With the us contractors building remote controlled devices like these:

http://www.theuav.com/global_hawk.html

And these are the models that are made public keep in mind.

Another example and this is armature flying.

http://www.jokeroo.com/extremevideos...ontrolb52.html


To build a half size 757 model jet and pack it with a high explosive warhead would NOT be a difficult task.

doesn't the pentagon have a "ring" structure, and some outer walls collapsed after the impact?

Yes... and the sky is blue and gasoline tastes bad.

looks like youve got it all figured out.. so what the fuck happenned to all the passengers on the 'real' plane, jackass.

The wings came off on impact. That's why the hole was so small. And if it was packed with explosives, why didn't it explode? Your theory is verging on random. Oh, and what sl_funkee said... That's been a constant thorn in the side of 9/11 "omg it woznt a plain" theorists. And I've never heard a satisfactory answer.

Say the US government did it if you want, I don't know, maybe they did. But whoever it was, it was a fucking plane, because anything else would have caused a lot more difficulty and gained nothing.

Yes. The wings. Came..Off.. That is ridiculous on SO many levels. Dont speak anymore.

So the wings came off and dissolved into nothingness.



And im not going to speculate where the people on the original 757 went, there is just too many possibilities. And Not many of you are open to any of the alternative scenarios.

And IF a 757 ACTUALLY flew into the pentagon where are the tapes? The real definitive tapes, not shitty still frames and long shots that prove nothing. Considering it is public knowledge that the impact was captured from several different angels and the fbi seized them immediately .


Why? Because there is no 757.

There was a small amount of fuss created when one of the fire chiefs assigned to deal with the blaze was due to attend a conference - however the night before he cancelled.

Whether or not this is relevant to any conspiracy is a matter of speculation - however i believe that his eye-witness testimony is indeed an integral part of the official story.

Anyway, on to speculating as to what really happened.

Regardless of what people say, there was indeed damage done to the pentagon -HOWEVER - On closer analysis you can see that every room that was visible was completely empty - no desks, shelves or even people, note that whilst we have a confirmed death toll on the WTC, we don't have one on the pentagon.
(i'm sure this can be explained away with the usual 'public security' b/s).

Then there's the plane itself - WHERE IS IT?

It is my belief that there was no plane, as the above poster stated, and perhaps this is what the fire chief was going to comment on, but again that's just speculation.

So, what do we know?

We know that there is a non-existent death toll, a non-existent plane, and a witness who refused to comment, and that somehow all this means something.

As to what it means, i'll leave it to you to figure out.

Note; I am treating this instance seperately from the WTC, so there may be some conflicting possibilities i haven't looked at in this post.

EDIT: Also; it would take an experienced pilot to hit the pentagon at the speed of which a 747 would acheive on an incoming vector, not some amatuer hijacker.

he wouldnt have been the only one to see what was or was not there, not a single one of the firefighters would have come forward and reported not seeing a plane?

thats pretty interesting and i'd really like to see a picture, all the ones i've looked through are too small to get a good look.

i believe they went to flight school.

I think its interesting they demand high quality videos of such a thing. What the hell do you expect? Why would they point a high quality camera at the pentagon all day anyway? I thought it a bit unusual there was anything more than a security camera at all.

^^ i know, complete coverage around the entire pentagon 24/7......wtf