Quote:
Originally Posted by logged
First E*NIX arguing that isn't Linux related?
|
The biggest problem with your posts are they are not descriptive.
If you wish to be understood more and misunderstood less, take more time in relaying data that you are putting forth in a post.
All of the posts I've seen from you are so fundamentally fucking retarded I almost can't stand to read them.
Take this for example:
Quote:
|
It'll take you about 40 mins to download all of the cds with a dsl connection.
|
While this is hardly relevant to this thread, and doesn't mean much, it is an example.. the time it takes to download something doesn't merely depend on what class or style or protocol connection you use.. but your actual bandwidth you are allocated and have at your disposal. Some DSL connections are faster than some cable connections.
So really what you meant to say was, that Sun/com's servers are fast, not it's "download managers" and that depending on the bandwidth you have, you could download all of Solaris 10 in 40 minutes.
A DSL connection at 256KBPS won't download Solaris 10 in no fucking 40 minutes. I can download a 3GB spin of Fedora in about 60 minutes on 5MBPS cable.. this relates to actual bandwidth not the connection type you are on.. which you made absolutely no effort to explain or describe.
In the event your argument is that it needs no explaining, the person who needs no explanation already knows enough about what you aren't explaining, to see your post is full of trash.
You will probably take offense to my post to you, and I am not surprised.
Most people do take offense when they are confronted with something they seriously don't beleive
to be true, and in this case it is about the lack of quality and effort put into your posts.
So, I also suggest just to realize that you are doing this, rather than simply denying it.. and possibly try to make an effort in the future to further clarify exactly what you are saying in a post.