|
|
 |
|
|
|
register |
bbs |
search |
rss |
faq |
about
|
|
|
meet up |
add to del.icio.us |
digg it
|
|
|
| Sex and Affection Anything and everything about sex and relations. Please try to keep this forum on-topic, since things tend to wander a bit. Search through old topics before posting a new one, as questions get repeated a lot here. |
 |
|
|
#1
 2007-04-19, 13:13 |
IOA 
Regular
|
|
|
|
 not able to have babies?
this girl i been 'doing' for the last 2 months (without a condom, pull out every time) is worrying about being pregnant each time before her period starts. This is another month and the same thing is happening again. But she said that when she was 14 she was raped 10 times by the same guy within 2 months time. she said she wasn't pregnant from it. I was wondering if she is even able to have kids..? Also, what are the chances of her getting pregnant when i pullout in plenty of time?
|
|
#2
2007-04-19, 13:19 |
newbwhowants2
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: not able to have babies?
still a chance but not as big as if you stay in their.... make sure you pull out and like pull him down so he won't come on her or her stomach it can drip down really fast depending on positions
|
|
#3
2007-04-19, 13:20 |
|
Moderator
|
|
dodging the rain and tractors
|
|
Re: not able to have babies?
Dear god, let this be a troll post.
I refuse to believe that even an american teenager could be that ill informed in these ungodly days.
|
|
#4
2007-04-19, 13:32 |
|
|
Re: not able to have babies?
Is it so fucking hard to grasp the fucking fact that the pullout method is simply retarded?!
For crying out loud..
Untill a professional doctor has checked her out and declaired her infertile, and then another doctor just to make sure, dont take any fucking chances.
And please, for the love of god, use a condom. They're like, £2 for a pack of 6. If you're so poor you cant afford condoms, you deffinately shouldnt be fucking her bare. Kids are even more expensive.
|
|
#5
2007-04-19, 14:19 |
Mr.Happy
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: not able to have babies?
One of those S&A posts that make me want to slam my head against the desk until I can't see anything.
|
|
#6
2007-04-19, 14:34 |
IOA
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: not able to have babies?
then wtf is this study saying there is no sperm in pre cum? the chances anyway, before this, was normally low.
"Some concern exists that the pre-ejaculate fluid may carry sperm into the vagina. In itself, the pre-ejaculate, a lubricating secretion produced by the Littre or Cowper's glands, contains no sperm. A study examining the pre-ejaculate for the presence of spermatozoa found none in the samples of 16 men. However, a previous ejaculation may have left some sperm hidden within the folds of the urethral lining. In examinations of the pre-ejaculate in a small study, the pre-ejaculate was free of spermatozoa in all of 11 HIV-seronegative men and 4 or 12 seropositive men. Although the 8 samples containing spermatozoa revealed only small clumps of a few hundred sperm, these could possibly pose a risk of fertilization. In all likelihood, the spermatozoa left from a previous ejaculation could be washed out with the force of a normal urination. However, this remains unstudied."
|
|
#7
2007-04-19, 14:48 |
|
|
Re: not able to have babies?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by IOA
then wtf is this study saying there is no sperm in pre cum? the chances anyway, before this, was normally low.
"Some concern exists that the pre-ejaculate fluid may carry sperm into the vagina. In itself, the pre-ejaculate, a lubricating secretion produced by the Littre or Cowper's glands, contains no sperm. A study examining the pre-ejaculate for the presence of spermatozoa found none in the samples of 16 men. However, a previous ejaculation may have left some sperm hidden within the folds of the urethral lining. In examinations of the pre-ejaculate in a small study, the pre-ejaculate was free of spermatozoa in all of 11 HIV-seronegative men and 4 or 12 seropositive men. Although the 8 samples containing spermatozoa revealed only small clumps of a few hundred sperm, these could possibly pose a risk of fertilization. In all likelihood, the spermatozoa left from a previous ejaculation could be washed out with the force of a normal urination. However, this remains unstudied."
|
If you allready know all this shit and you beleive it and refuse to listen to anyone elses oppinions on how retared you're being, why the fuck did you post this thread?
Idiot. |
|
#8
2007-04-19, 17:56 |
|
Moderator
|
|
The fine line between genius and madness
|
|
Re: not able to have babies?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jackketch
Dear god, let this be a troll post.
I refuse to believe that even an american teenager could be that ill informed in these ungodly days.
|
You can refuse it all you want. I'll even join you in refusing to believe things. I refuse to believe that the sky is blue. |
|
#9
2007-04-19, 18:03 |
Duck In Fog
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: not able to have babies?
Just because she hasn't got pregnant doesn't mean she can't.
Also, she was 14, which does mean she can have kids, being 14 'n' all.
Either way, use something. Me and my boyfriend were fucking for about 2 - 3 months using nothing before I got on the pill. I'd worry a lil before my period. It was a totally stupid thing to do. So get her on the pill or just use condoms. Gahhh.
|
|
#10
2007-04-19, 18:24 |
IDontLoveYou
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: not able to have babies?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr.Happy
One of those S&A posts that make me want to slam my head against the desk until I can't see anything.
|
*grabs a bag of chips*
proceed. |
|
|
|
To the best of our knowledge, the text on this page may be freely reproduced and distributed.
totse.com certificate signatures
|
|
|
About | Community | Bad Ideas | Drugs | Ego | Erotica | Fringe | Society | Technology
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]()
![]()
|
