this is a picture of a girl i know. i certainly wouldnt say no:

http://tinyurl.com/399oe9

Only if she took the spongebob bikini off.

Face pic for certainty.

50 quid says she's got an ugly face.

nah her face isnt ugly. havnt got a pic of it though.

butter face.

Why does "she" have five-o-clock shadow in that pic?

http://img251.imageshack.us/my.php?image=la4c2d78cb7b368a5e12ed9pf3.jpg

Seriously, dude. Shave before you drag.

quote:Originally posted by JoePedo:

Why does "she" have five-o-clock shadow in that pic?

htt p://img251.imageshack.us/my.php?image=la4c2d78cb7b368a5e12ed9pf3.jpg (http: //img251.i mageshack. us/my.php? image=la4c 2d78cb7b36 8a5e12ed9p f3.jpg)

Seriously, dude. Shave before you drag.



Shit. That is a dude. I thought the shoulders looked a little wrong for a chick. No curves either, no tits to speak of + the forearms are a little too big for the average chick.

The OP is a bastard.

Uhh, I just looked at her shoulders/neck and it looks to manly.

Why no face pic

i fuck.

It probably does have an ugly face.

quote:Originally posted by Khepri:

It probably does have an ugly face.

lol

Thats a freakin dude!

I think it's a tranny.

Ugly face and/or man.

Well, if it wasn't clearly a dude in his 8 year old sister's Spongebob bikini, then maybe, ask again then.

Lol, tranny-troll. Don't know what possessed that poor, confused young man to wear his sister's bathing suit, but I forsee a new trend here O_o *sigh* kids these days.

Doesn\'t look like a man. The stomach looks womanish, the pecs are too big in relation to the body, and there doesn\'t appear to be a penis-bulge in the panties. It could be a tranny though. The shoulders look a bit off.

Sorry yall, but i really dont think that that's a dude.

quote:Originally posted by Maniak182:

Sorry yall, but i really dont think that that's a dude.

yeah, thats definitely female.

^^

And yeah, I'd fuck her.

Trap or not, I'd hit it.

Unless underage..

Ugh.. I would fuck it.. Hope it's not a trap but its fucking hot!

Dude or not, I'd still fuck it up the ass.

ditto. trann or fem, she is game.

Nice body, defo a woman, probably an BOBFOC, (body of bay watch face of crime watch)

Your a cunt, argh he looked so good at first sight when he was a she.

LOL THIS! Do you call her this to her face?

Everytime my eyes wander towards the nipple I see spongebob's nose, utter phail. There's some spongebob cameltoe going on from a better angle, I'd wager a good sum on that.

P.S Is that a magic tree attached to her tit?

[This message has been edited by DuckWarri0r (edited 03-27-2007).]

Assuming it's a she, yes.

no

If its a girl, yeah

the hands are the giveaway, those are man hands, and the beard



if it was a chick, maybe

no... i see ribs

and i don't like the shoulders either

Guy or girl i'd hit it

I'd hit it - WITH A BUICK!!!

She looks alright to me though, as long as she doesn't have a wang, I'd do her. Unless she has a donkey face, of course.

Those saying it's a guy are retarded, that is clearly a chick, no adam's apple, no missing rib, no bulge at bottom, and there are (small) tits not pecs (notice the curve, pecs don't curve unless they're man boobs, and she obviously isn't a fat guy). And what are you talking about 5 o'clock shadow? You can't even see your face, just part of her chin, that is covered by a glare. The most I can say is it looks like there is a faint happy trail, which hair from the naval to the crouch is a huge turn off... tell her to shave that shit (if it's really there and not a trick of the light)

Would I hit it? Depends on the face. If it matches the body I'd say yes*, if she has a bad face, then no. I got semi-high standards, she has to have more then a nice body for me to bone her.

*disclaimer- I have been working, and therefore drinking tonight. As most people know a drunk yes is often different then a sover yes.

Gentlemen, we are looking at a grade A Trap right here.

quote:Originally posted by NewRage:

no missing rib

In future, try to be less stupid. (http://biology.clc.uc.edu/Courses/bio105/ribs.htm)

Yep.

You guys seriously are morons if you think that is not a genetic girl.

The image isn't high enough res to make out ANYTHING on her chin.

The fat distribution is inherently female.

She HAS breasts. Small, but they are definitely breasts.

Her hands aren't manly. WTF are you talking about?

Shoulders look odd because of the angle and the photo is 2 dimensional.

Her arms are not muscular but rather smooth.

You can see at her panty line there are slight gaps where her hips are large enough to suspend the elastic off her skin. Her hips are far too round and shapely to be a trap.

The ONLY WAY that person could be a transsexual would be if they started taking female hormones BEFORE male puberty, so they didn't experience male puberty at all. But this would've prevented what you call "man hands" and the apparent "5 o clock shadow". So if that is the case, you couldn't tell from any clues in this picture ANYWAY.

In all honesty, you guys call trap at the drop of a hat. If I posted a pic of Jessica Simpson, and you didn't know who she was, you'd call trap because she has a masculine chin.

The internet is making you hypersensitive to traps and you are seriously picking apart ANYTHING that looks slightly non-feminine.

Take a look around the mall with the same fine tooth comb you are going over these pics and you will see many women who are far less feminine than the girl in that picture.

Shit, some middle eastern, indian or other dark haired women even have noticeable facial hair (and don't bleach/wax it like most of the populous). It's not rough and spiky like a mans, and it stops growing once it gets to a very short length like peach fuzz, but it's on their upper lips and sometimes chins and is quite visible.

You have to realize that our societies complete obsession with accentuating secondary female sex characteristics is making you guys think anyone even SLIGHTLY less feminine than the top say 5% is too masculine to be female. If you applied your current standards to all women you'd be left with a far larger pool of supposed traps than actual females.

[This message has been edited by SephirothAngelus (edited 03-28-2007).]

quote:Originally posted by SephirothAngelus:

Shit, some middle eastern, indian or other dark haired women even have noticeable facial hair (and don't bleach/wax it like most of the populous). It's not rough and spiky like a mans, and it stops growing once it gets to a very short length like peach fuzz, but it's on their upper lips and sometimes chins and is quite visible.

Bullshit. There is an East Indian woman in my town who has a 3 inch beard and mustache, the whole deal.

quote:Originally posted by streetjusticeforall:

Bullshit. There is an East Indian woman in my town who has a 3 inch beard and mustache, the whole deal.

I've never seen anything like that but it sounds frightening!

If you think it's a female, 'tis a female!

Why is there no face?

And why is this chick's chest so flat?

Yeah, I'm starting to get the idea that I really shouldn't fuck this one, might be a regretable decision.

quote:Originally posted by The_Rabbi:

Dude or not, I'd still fuck it up the ass.

Agreed.

I'd hit it.

Maybe I missed something somewhere, but it's kinda hard to fuck someone with a bikini on. You generally have to take it off.

I don't care if it is a dude, I'd fuck it either way.

Who the fuck gives a crap if she has an ugly face? What happend to turning them around and shoving their head into the pillow? Besides, maybe she just didn't want a picture of her face on the internet, or the dude who posted it didn't want to show that if she's paranoid.

Check for peenzorz. If she doesn't have one, go for it.