Yes there was just a thread on this. No, it was not the same. So yesterday, some people I know kind of got "touchy feely" during science class. We will leave it at that So today, in cycle, I'm telling my bud Greg what happened, how the hand job wasn't, how shall I say, finished. He agreed that it was lame, but the annoying girl behind us(who, believe it or not is actually experienced-I think of her as a fat twat) claimed that if you just play with his dick for a while, it's still a hand job. I firmly believe one must finish the job. So, &T, I pose the question. Must one ejaculate for it to be officially called a hand job?

And yes, this is a serious thread.

I dont know there are two possible arguements

The hand and dick come into contact and the dick is played with it technically counts as a hand job

but without finishing it it shouldnt count

hmmm i'd say he got wanked

i just have to say this why would a chick stop unless it going on for like 5 mins or caught mabey your just small in the pants if she dosent finish the job i dont think it counts just like in sex if neither of you cum during sex your consider a failure

Must either side orgasm for it to be sex? Would you be fine with your wife being pounded by the gardener so long as she didn't cum, and he pulled out to masturbate to climax?

Would it then just be masturbation?

Naw, as long as there's pumping for a substantial amount of time.

Personally, I've never come from a hand job but I still see them as hand jobs nonetheless. Crappy hand jobs, but hand jobs still.

-F☺rd

quote:Originally posted by El_Muncher:

i just have to say this why would a chick stop unless it going on for like 5 mins or caught mabey your just small in the pants if she dosent finish the job i dont think it counts just like in sex if neither of you cum during sex your consider a failure

haha, he was half asian so she was saying he was small

Alright, so I'm getting the impression that it was in fact a hand job. Well, thanks guys