I was wondering, which is really better, "chili" made from ephedrine or "chili" made from psuedoephedrine? Ive had good chili and bad chili, but have never been able to say conclusively, " this is sub par because of the PE or E".

I prefer ephedrine but i use pseudo cause its cheaper. Although i think the molecule pictures of both are the same.

[This message has been edited by poopeen (edited 07-11-2003).]

Ahhhh..........a long argued question here!!

Prior to the meth act in the USA all chili was more than likely ephedrine.

I'm Old-School here and going with ephedrine.

Why?! It seemed to have longer legs and was so used it got thresholded by the DEA to where single-entity ephedrine was a memory for what its worth.

9 grams per customer per 30 days is the threshold for ephedrine. Mind you if its sold in the USA and bought in the USA.

And mini-thins(God we miss you!!) got married to guaifinesen.

So you tell me man.

what the hells the deal with guafenisen anyway? NO WAY to get it out?

someone smart said to use petroluem ether for ephed/guifanesisn minis. ephed or guif

is soluable in naptha, but the other isnt.

I would imagine to do this,get some vm&p naptha, get 2 or 10 bottles/boxes or more(to test) of the ephed/guif. stuff. crucsh pills,

soak in naptha for 5 hours, IF there is some

wet pill mass in the bottom of your dissolvation container pour naptha and wet pill crap into/through coffee filter(s) and

dry everything, the more filters you use at 1 time to filter your napthalene the cleaner

the whatever will be in the end. best way I can think to test both seperate piles of

product is taste/burn test. the ephed pile will be more bitter than the other.

(more bitter is a word I lernt in English 120