About
Community
Bad Ideas
Drugs
Ego
Erotica
Fringe
Society
Technology
register | bbs | search | rss | faq | about
meet up | add to del.icio.us | digg it
Go Back   Community > Science > Backyard Ballistics
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Backyard Ballistics This forum is dedicated to the safe teaching and responsible handling of high and low explosives. You will not find any information on how to make "bombs" or any such device(s) . Backyard ballistics will teach you the science and the art of pyrotechnics and how to manufacture and use explosives/pyrotechnics safely and responsibly. Backyard ballistics is also a haven for rocketry and pneumatic cannons. All information contained within this forum is for educational purposes ONLY. Totse does not accept responsiblity for any incident involving the use of the information contained within this forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 #1 
Old 2003-07-20, 09:09
And1129 And1129 is offline
Regular
 
Default BP question

I have no probloms making BP, but I just hada question about the chemistry of it. I know that KNO3 is an oxidizer, and that Sulfur and Carbon are Reducing agents. But why does BP need 2 different Reducing agents for the same substance (KNO3) to be Reduced?

IN other RXNs there are usually only 1 ox. to 1 red. I know Sulfur and Carbon are needed for a quality prouduct, but why is it that these TWO elements are needed?
 #2 
Old 2003-07-20, 16:58
Wozzles Wozzles is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: BP question

When u make BP, you can edit out the sulfer and just use 75% KNO3 to 25% carbon. The carbon increases the burn rate i think and if u use sulfer, it will increase the gas output.
 #3 
Old 2003-07-21, 18:26
a123x a123x is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: BP question

I just got a 4lb of sulfur some days ago and made some proper BP meal powder. It seems to ignite a lot easier than sulfurless BP(not that sulfurless BP is hard to light or anything). Also I think it burns about the same speed as sulfurless meal, it was only ball milled for 2.5 hours where my sulfurless BP was like 5 hours. I'll try making a 2ft line of each powder connected in a V(so I can ignite them at the same time easier) and see which burns quicker. Regular BP burns hotter I think, that is why it has higher gas output because it actually releases fewer moles of gas compared to sulfurless BP.
 #4 
Old 2003-07-22, 07:54
And1129 And1129 is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: BP question

Well that's interesting. i'll do some expearmnts with differnt ratios of KNO3 : C, and KNO3 : S. But i wonder why the formula evolve the way it did if only 2 ingrdiants can be used and produce similer results? Hmm... Well thanks for the input.
 #5 
Old 2003-07-22, 09:27
static_firefly static_firefly is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: BP question

The two components are not nessary to allow combustion with the kno3, however this gives different propities. Sulfurless burns very fast but with little gasses. Sulphur lowers the ignition temp and produces more gasses, so its better for propellents.
 
To the best of our knowledge, the text on this page may be freely reproduced and distributed.
 

totse.com certificate signatures
 
 
About | Community | Bad Ideas | Drugs | Ego | Erotica | Fringe | Society | Technology
Hot Topics