Damn that's gonna be messed up.But does god have any say on what may happen on this oh so infamous day to be made as of yet?

Along with 2012,there has to be something along the lines on say of something of this date in history.& I'm not thinking about religious zeolot rhetoricals saying"thy doom is nye!"or any of that crap,although it may actually be deemed to be along with it.

So what's the say on it?Anything we should be worried about?

I'm sorry that the news hasn't come to you yet, but the number of the beast is actually 616. Try again.

616....no.

06/06/06.... that will be teh awesomeo !!!

i bet there will be a school shooting/murdersuicide/murder/suicide/genocide.

quote:Originally posted by spaceMAN:

616....no.

06/06/06.... that will be teh awesomeo !!!

i bet there will be a school shooting/murdersuicide/murder/suicide/genocide.

lol probably..but who's gonna carry it out then eh?Another Native American Nazi follower or something of the lines?(It was in the news a while back some kid murdered his grandparents then went for the school to kill more,but I dont remember specifics other than it was a few months back)& well,for the 616,you think maybe then,then?

quote:Originally posted by KRJ:

Damn that's gonna be messed up.But does god have any say on what may happen on this oh so infamous day to be made as of yet?

Along with 2012,there has to be something along the lines on say of something of this date in history.& I'm not thinking about religious zeolot rhetoricals saying"thy doom is nye!"or any of that crap,although it may actually be deemed to be along with it.

So what's the say on it?Anything we should be worried about?



First, Jesus said that only the Father knows the day.

Second, 666 is not a date. It is the number of the name (of the Beast).

And, as was sorta pointed out, some manuscripts give this mumber as 616. Although, personally, i think it is 666.

And, just to be clear, it is six hundred sixty six, as opposed to three sixes.

quote:Originally posted by xtreem5150ahm:



First, Jesus said that only the Father knows the day.

Second, 666 is not a date. It is the number of the name (of the Beast).

And, as was sorta pointed out, some manuscripts give this mumber as 616. Although, personally, i think it is 666.

And, just to be clear, it is six hundred sixty six, as opposed to three sixes.

Actually if it is derived from a Hebrew methoid of numerology it would be three sixes, because hebrew uses repetition to show empahsis.

quote:Originally posted by JewDude:

Actually if it is derived from a Hebrew methoid of numerology it would be three sixes, because hebrew uses repetition to show empahsis.

Not necessarily. Hebrew & Greek (and i think Aramaic) are languages that use(used) the writing characters also for denoting numbers.

The prophecy of the Mark was written in Greek. But the wording is "matter of factly", so i think any language that uses alpha characters also as numbers is a possibility.

Since it is prophecy, i think the true meaning will be understood (and also, rejected by many) when the time comes.

Lutheran eschatology (sp?) attributes 666 as symbolism for verious reasons... part of which, 6 being imperfect and short of 7. And 3 of them linked together would be 3 'imperfects' compared to the Trinity of God (3 "perfects")...

it's been awhile since i've read up on this, but in a nutshell, this is close enough for now.

I find it funny, though, that Lutherans for the most part, take the Bible pretty literal, until they get to Revelations. In my oppinion, the symbolism that Lutheran doctrine teaches, concerning Revelations is probably partialy right, because it is also based off of OT prophecy (and NT), but i think Revelations is ALSO meant to be understood literally.. i.e. a real Anti-Christ, a literal mark on the right hand or on the forehead, etc....

I realize that a literal understanding of Revelations is harder for people to handle than the same understanding of Genesis and the rest of the Bible. But i figure, if God is the author of the whole thing, AND He is telling us His Truth, why would He change from mostly literal to mostly symbolic? Even OT prophecies, when understood after the fact, were quite literal, but before the fact , they were questioned and doubted....i guess we'll know when the time comes.

Simple the beast movie comes out

http://www.thebeastmovie.com/

And think of this... I made a metric clock, just for the hell of it. For me, it'll be 6/6/06 AT 6:66:666

It's just a number, guys.

quote:Originally posted by Social Junker:

It's just a number, guys.

No shit!?

did anything disastrous happen in 06/06/1906 ?

quote:Originally posted by TEAMKILLER:

Simple the beast movie comes out

http://www.thebeastmovie.com/



That movie looks so gay.

I'm hanging on for the one they're making about Aleister Crowley, that'll kick ass.

http://www.edwardtbabinski.us/skepticism/616666.html http://www.religionnewsblog.com/11134

quote:Originally posted by Holy Cow:

did anything disastrous happen in 06/06/1906 ?

A woman called Zepha McCool was born on that day, no joke! Now if that isn't a really obvious alias for the antichrist (or the Fonz) I don't know what is!

quote:Originally posted by xtreem5150ahm:

Not necessarily. Hebrew & Greek (and i think Aramaic) are languages that use(used) the writing characters also for denoting numbers.

The prophecy of the Mark was written in Greek. But the wording is "matter of factly", so i think any language that uses alpha characters also as numbers is a possibility.

Since it is prophecy, i think the true meaning will be understood (and also, rejected by many) when the time comes.

Lutheran eschatology (sp?) attributes 666 as symbolism for verious reasons... part of which, 6 being imperfect and short of 7. And 3 of them linked together would be 3 'imperfects' compared to the Trinity of God (3 "perfects")...

it's been awhile since i've read up on this, but in a nutshell, this is close enough for now.

I find it funny, though, that Lutherans for the most part, take the Bible pretty literal, until they get to Revelations. In my oppinion, the symbolism that Lutheran doctrine teaches, concerning Revelations is probably partialy right, because it is also based off of OT prophecy (and NT), but i think Revelations is ALSO meant to be understood literally.. i.e. a real Anti-Christ, a literal mark on the right hand or on the forehead, etc....

I realize that a literal understanding of Revelations is harder for people to handle than the same understanding of Genesis and the rest of the Bible. But i figure, if God is the author of the whole thing, AND He is telling us His Truth, why would He change from mostly literal to mostly symbolic? Even OT prophecies, when understood after the fact, were quite literal, but before the fact , they were questioned and doubted....i guess we'll know when the time comes.

Ronald. Wilson. Reagan. The Social Insurance Number was created by Reagan so you have to have one to get a job, and hands across america was when he united all races for the first time ever under one rule. And God didnt write the bible men did. Revelations is symbolic because John saw it in his dreams. Also, he explains cars as horses that spew sulphuric gas or something like that.

It's not like 6/6/06 didn't happen in 1906, 1806, 1706, 1606...

I don't remember hearing about anything spectacular happening on those dates.

In 1666 London pretty much burnt to the ground.

It would be kindnof cool if that were to happen again.

quote:Originally posted by napoleon_complex:

In 1666 London pretty much burnt to the ground.

It would be kindnof cool if that were to happen again.



I'd like france to burn to ground... or canada... but wouldn't that have to be 2666? not 2006?

I dunno.

While we're on this subject, wouldn't it have made sense for anything apocalyptic to have occured during 666 BC or 666 AD? Even though you've got your 1666 AD and 2666 AD, it can't exactly be considered as the "perfect" or actual number 666 (for obvious reasons), can it? And then there's the theory that good 'ol whoever-the-hell-it-was who had actually dreamed of this number, saw it BACKWARDS in his dream (must've been tripping something hardcore, aye?) as 666 whereas it quite possibly was 999. Just some food for thought...

~Leftie

[This message has been edited by Satan's Left Testicle (edited 06-07-2005).]

quote:Originally posted by Clarphimous:

I'm sorry that the news hasn't come to you yet, but the number of the beast is actually 616. Try again.

Oh wow, I don't know where to begin on that one. Theres a huge basis on the number being 666. I really don't feel like going in depth right now though so I will start a thread on the topic another day with a number of insights on the mark of the beast that I'm sure some people will find quite interesting.

quote:Originally posted by cptn_spoon:

A woman called Zepha McCool was born on that day, no joke! Now if that isn't a really obvious alias for the antichrist (or the Fonz) I don't know what is!

Too bad she's dead by now, and by God, the world still hasn't ended.

quote:Originally posted by Social Junker:

Too bad she's dead by now, and by God, the world still hasn't ended.

But Henry Winkler lives on! A coincidence? Possibly! But I'd certainly keep an eye on him in early June next year...

URa11FUX: Oh wow, I don't know where to begin on that one. Theres a huge basis on the number being 666. I really don't feel like going in depth right now though so I will start a thread on the topic another day with a number of insights on the mark of the beast that I'm sure some people will find quite interesting.

A huge basis? As in, people have made a lot of conjecture about how 666 relates to apocalypse. That's just about it. See the links I posted above; not only do they show that the oldest manuscripts of Revelation have 616, but they also give other information that's interesting.

Here they are again: http://www.edwardtbabinski.us/skepticism/616666.html http://www.religionnewsblog.com/11134

Dr. Aitken said, however, that scholars now believe the number in question has very little to do the devil. It was actually a complicated numerical riddle in Greek, meant to represent someone's name, she said.

"It's a number puzzle -- the majority opinion seems to be that it refers to [the Roman emperor] Nero."

Revelation was actually a thinly disguised political tract, with the names of those being criticized changed to numbers to protect the authors and early Christians from reprisals. "It's a very political document," Dr. Aitken said. "It's a critique of the politics and society of the Roman empire, but it's written in coded language and riddles."

quote:Originally posted by Satan's Left Testicle:

While we're on this subject, wouldn't it have made sense for anything apocalyptic to have occured during 666 BC or 666 AD? Even though you've got your 1666 AD and 2666 AD, it can't exactly be considered as the "perfect" or actual number 666 (for obvious reasons), can it? And then there's the theory that good 'ol whoever-the-hell-it-was who had actually dreamed of this number, saw it BACKWARDS in his dream (must've been tripping something hardcore, aye?) as 666 whereas it quite possibly was 999. Just some food for thought...

~Leftie





Didn't that come from some cheap satan's doomday movie ripoff?

quote:Originally posted by Clarphimous:

Dr. Aitken said, however, that scholars now believe the number in question has very little to do the devil. It was actually a complicated numerical riddle in Greek, meant to represent someone's name, she said.

"It's a number puzzle -- the majority opinion seems to be that it refers to [the Roman emperor] Nero."

Revelation was actually a thinly disguised political tract, with the names of those being criticized changed to numbers to protect the authors and early Christians from reprisals. "It's a very political document," Dr. Aitken said. "It's a critique of the politics and society of the Roman empire, but it's written in coded language and riddles."

My old Latin teacher once told me that,e ven went into some pretty obscure details and how they related to how many emperors that had ruled since Christianity began, what political groups were being symbolized and whatnot. It really, really makes sense, and if God allowed his people to write a doomsday theory that could easily be misconstrued, that's just fucked up. There was also another book of doomsday that the Catholic church decided was not cannon: The Book of the Armageddon. It pretty much said that the world jsut up and ends and that Peter convinces God to allow everyone into heaven. This would make God able to change his mind by influence of a mortal, which frightened the church, so it was dropped in the Vatican vault.

quote:Originally posted by Holy Cow:

did anything disastrous happen in 06/06/1906 ?

Well, there was the great earthquake in San Francisco in 1906, I don't know the exact date but it was around june 6th. Who knows, maybe we'll get another one. I doubt it.

Well actually I googled it, it happened on april 18th, 1906.

So you figure 4-18-06. Thats a bit far from 06-06-06.

That still would be cool.

[This message has been edited by PUN5H3D3X5T3NC3 (edited 06-08-2005).]

It's equilibrium day! I don't think the number will change anything. I always have a big party with plenty of underage alcohol consumption. I predict that the government and media will blow it out of proportion with a big hoax, just like Y2K.

quote:Originally posted by Holy Cow:

did anything disastrous happen in 06/06/1906 ?

Or for that matter, any of the other 6/6/06's in the past 2000 years...fucking prophetic nutcases.

December 23rd 2012...just wait and see

quote:Originally posted by Syrex05:

December 23rd 2012...just wait and see

What's suppose to happen then?

quote:Originally posted by Clarphimous:

I'm sorry that the news hasn't come to you yet, but the number of the beast is actually 616. Try again.

IRON MAIDEN NEVER LIES!

quote:Originally posted by Pez_V1:

IRON MAIDEN NEVER LIES!

YEAH BROTHER! SING IT TO THE CHOIR!

quote:Originally posted by Clarphimous:

I'm sorry that the news hasn't come to you yet, but the number of the beast is actually 616. Try again.

No it is 666 geez get with the times

to the 06/06/06 person i say 'meh had to happen some day' but it is a very controversial topic im so glad i thought of it (I did even before i saw this post).

even if 616 is is satans number what about 06/01/06

[This message has been edited by midgetbasketball (edited 06-09-2005).]

quote:Originally posted by midgetbasketball:

No it is 666 geez get with the times

to the 06/06/06 person i say 'meh had to happen some day' but it is a very controversial topic im so glad i thought of it (I did even before i saw this post).

even if 616 is is satans number what about 06/01/06



Personally,after reading everything else here I'd believe either dipshit will happen(as in nothing at all)or so much shit will happen we wont know how to handle it at the moment.What about that whole week between 6/1/06-6/6/06 eh?That's sure to be all hell if anything were to happen.

quote:Originally posted by Clarphimous:

URa11FUX: Oh wow, I don't know where to begin on that one. Theres a huge basis on the number being 666. I really don't feel like going in depth right now though so I will start a thread on the topic another day with a number of insights on the mark of the beast that I'm sure some people will find quite interesting.

A huge basis? As in, people have made a lot of conjecture about how 666 relates to apocalypse. That's just about it. See the links I posted above; not only do they show that the oldest manuscripts of Revelation have 616, but they also give other information that's interesting.

Here they are again: http://www.edwardtbabinski.us/skepticism/616666.html http://www.religionnewsblog.com/11134

Dr. Aitken said, however, that scholars now believe the number in question has very little to do the devil. It was actually a complicated numerical riddle in Greek, meant to represent someone's name, she said.

"It's a number puzzle -- the majority opinion seems to be that it refers to [the Roman emperor] Nero."

Revelation was actually a thinly disguised political tract, with the names of those being criticized changed to numbers to protect the authors and early Christians from reprisals. "It's a very political document," Dr. Aitken said. "It's a critique of the politics and society of the Roman empire, but it's written in coded language and riddles."

I don't think it takes a huge brain to realize that argument is very loosley based.

I'm not trying to say it has absolutely no credibility, just that it can't be considered at all as fact.

Furthermore what I was talking about as far as a basis for the number being 666 is something few christians and few ministers know. Like I said I'll post a topic on it. Probably sometime with in the next few weeks along with some other theories on it.