Though this time, with a unique question, I hope.

Seems to me as if having a foreskin would simply be a pain in the ass, not to mention the penis. (I'm cut, obviously.) What with smegma, higher chance of getting HIV, etc....Are there any advantages?

actually, mines not annoying at all, or a pain in the ass, and you dont have a better chance of getting an STD with it, thats just bullshit.

with the foreskin there is up to 30% more pleasure during intercourse.

quote:Originally posted by A-dam:

with the foreskin there is up to 30% more pleasure during intercourse.

For the male or the female?

quote:Originally posted by Discipulus:

For the male or the female?

Male,

But circumsized feels better for the women (without condom)

quote:Originally posted by A-dam:

Male,

But circumsized feels better for the women (without condom)



i am just wondering.. how the hell do u know this?

quote:Originally posted by Sfing inc:

i am just wondering.. how the hell do u know this?

Biology class.

smegma isnt a problem if you WASH it lol. and he aids thing: if the viral load is high enugh to be contagious, foreskin dont matter. the difference is like with smllpox: europeans have a higher natural immunity to it than native americans [indians]. still talking %15. so being ct isnt something id rely on as far as aids.

ive had gf say they loved feeling the skin mve up and down my shaft. plus my orgasms are naturally more intese. and when the 4th reich starts up, everyone will know im not a jew.

There's more to play with!

quote:Originally posted by Nihilism:

so being ct isnt something id rely on as far as aids.

Nobody in their right mind would RELY on that, but still, it's a plus.

I love my foreskin. If I came home circumcised, my dad would have killed the doctor to save me the hassle twenty years down the line. Apart from helping keep the General from getting too cold, foreskin helps with boredom. You can do the coolest stuff ever with it, fill it with stuff, stretch it, get a girl to pull it over her tongue and swirl, and when you masturbate it helps a whole lot. Kinda puts more pump in the action...

quote:Originally posted by A-dam:

with the foreskin there is up to 30% more pleasure during intercourse.

While I don't dispute that it's more pleasurable, how the hell do you get it as a percentage???

:S

It's just a piece of skin you dumbasses. You talk as if it is some great thing of debate. It's something that naturally you would have had the doctors not removed it, so there's nothing digusting about it, and as for pleaseing a woman it's the same feeling when the skin is pulled back as with a dick that has been circumsized. As for why they remove it, it really began as religion thing thing kind of turned to tradition. Oh and if you are having problems with dick cheese then you are one nasty motherfucker, take a shower and wash yourself!! As for the whole aids thing, use protection and don't screw everything that walks.

quote:Originally posted by dearestnight_falcon:

While I don't dispute that it's more pleasurable, how the hell do you get it as a percentage???

:S

I think he means that 30% of people polled found it more pleasurable?

quote:Originally posted by holy_pal:

I think he means that 30% of people polled found it more pleasurable?

What did they do, try their dick then swich their's out with someone else and see if their's felt better?

I really don't see how they can tell if it's more pleasurable let alone get a percentage down without having someone un-cut, then circumcize them and see what they think that way. And even if they did do that the results are bound to be off from what someone who was cut from birth would have though since the other person would be used to an un-cut dick attached to him. So it may or may not be more pleasurable, it doesn't really matter though since if you are cut there is nothing you can do and if you are un-cut there probably isn't anything you will do about it.

EDIT: Oh yeah, dude that said 30 percent, cite your sources. You can't go giving a statistic like that without citing your sources because everyone knows that 84% of all statistics are randomly made up. (see what I mean?)

[This message has been edited by Cloaked Dagger (edited 08-16-2004).]

quote:Originally posted by Cloaked Dagger:

[QUOTE]You can't go giving a statistic like that without citing your sources because everyone knows that 84% of all statistics are randomly made up. (see what I mean?)

What is your source of that statistic?

I'm uncut, and I'm happy that my parents left my body that way. I is wish to get cut, which I very doubt, I is up to me, and not them.

Smegma isn't a problem so long as you keep yourself clean, which is logical isn't it. You could claim that having armpit hair makes you more likely to have BO, but that's only if you don't bother wash yourself. Simple.

About that whole increased risk of getting STDs, thats pretty much rubbish from what I've read.

quote:Originally posted by DerMeister:

What is your source of that statistic?

In case you didn't notice I put a part in parenthesis after it. The whole point of that was that my statistic was randomly made up, hence the "see what I mean?" in parenthesis after.

How the fuck should I know if its real or not, ask my biology teacher he randomly said it when we were going through the anatomy of the shlong.

Foreskin is fun anyway, it slides all over the place and well...it's just great.

I really don't care. Cut or not, I find no difference.

I've heard that it feels better to the woman, yet it's appearance is strange (to American women). There is no viable medical reason for da snipping, so don't do it. The benefits outweigh any negligible risks.