How is it the defense of marriage if it shuns groups of people from getting into wedlock?

For you non-Americans (or if you pay even leses attention to the news than we do), THe Defense of Marriage Act is a Republican-driven insult towards gays that, if passed, would outlaw the marrying of homosexuals.

What's the big deal? THEY'RE QUEER. WHO FUCKING CARES?!!!!! I mean, most guys I know think most women are insane bitches and most women I know think most men are dumb assholes, so it's no surprise that someone would like their own gender better. More importantly, does another person's preference honestly bother some people so badly that they get offended and even try to persecute them for it by ostracizing their rights to marriage? Jesus, I myself think guys are way too boring physically to be attractive (that and I just plain love boobies), but because that's my belief doesn't mean it has to be someone else's. It's fucked up shit.

Your thoughts?

civil unions. marriage isnt for homos.

I think it should be allowed

I live in Canada...it's allowed here

quote:Originally posted by Numblove:

THe Defense of Marriage Act is a Republican-driven insult towards gays that, if passed, would outlaw the marrying of homosexuals.

First gays want laws against "hate crimes", then they want to be in the military, and now they want marriage. This is getting out of hand.

quote:What's the big deal? THEY'RE QUEER. WHO FUCKING CARES?!!!!! ...It's fucked up shit.

Your kind isn't welcome here.

quote:Your thoughts?

Don't mock me.



Disclaimer: the views expressed above do not reflect those of myself, S&A or totse.

Here's my take on this: if marriage among homosexuals is outlawed, divorce should be as well. If marriage isn't for homos, then it isn't for those who treat it lightly.

who cares. are they fucking you in the ass? no there not. are they doing it out on the street? no there not. sounds like a bunch of nosy bitches poking there faces where they dont have any business being.