|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
register |
bbs |
search |
rss |
faq |
about
|
 |
 |
meet up |
add to del.icio.us |
digg it
|
 |
 |
| Mad Scientists Science and Mathematics discussion-- theories, arguments, citations, proofs and pudding. |
 |
|
|
#1
 2008-10-03, 19:49
|
Gallows 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Riemann Sum/Integral question
Hey mad scientists, I got this problem wrong on my test:( and I was wondering how to answer it. I memorized the way my book describes to do Riemann sums, but I guess I didn't completely understand it. Any help will be greatly appreciated.
The table gives the values of speedometer readings of a braking car taken every three seconds. Express the integral as a limit of Riemann sum using the values at the right end points of the intervals. Do not evaluate the limit.
Table:
Speed(feet per second): | 73 | 63 | 54 | 37 | 22 | 9 | 0 |
Time of Reading in Seconds: | 10 | 13 | 16 | 19 | 22 | 25 | 28 |
|
|
#2
 2008-10-04, 20:20
|
SelfAdjoint 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: Riemann Sum/Integral question
You mean you're wanting an estimate, using a Riemann summation, of the distance travelled in that time? Multiply each number by three (since that's the length of each time interval) and add them together. That's it. The integral is the limit of this sum as the length of each interval tends to zero.
|
|
#3
 2008-10-04, 23:37
|
Gallows 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: Riemann Sum/Integral question
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SelfAdjoint
You mean you're wanting an estimate, using a Riemann summation, of the distance travelled in that time? Multiply each number by three (since that's the length of each time interval) and add them together. That's it. The integral is the limit of this sum as the length of each interval tends to zero.
|
What I want is the Riemann summation written as a limit. I know the answer contains a Sigma and a limit as n approaches infinity. I really hate these bullshit pseudo-conceptual problems....
|
|
#4
 2008-10-05, 17:30
|
|
Regular
|
|
The Big Rock Candy Mountains
|
|
Re: Riemann Sum/Integral question
lim t->inf of t sigma k=9 f(k+3)*3
I think thats it. Its been a while and I was always a little shaky with sigma notation.
|
|
#5
 2008-10-05, 18:43
|
Gallows 
Regular
|
|
|
|
Re: Riemann Sum/Integral question
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by OneMestizo
lim t->inf of t sigma k=9 f(k+3)*3
I think thats it. Its been a while and I was always a little shaky with sigma notation.
|
Thanks alot. That looks right.
By the way, is your location referring to the "paradise" or is it referring to the awesome, mind-shattering children's movie?
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51CZ600F5BL._SL500_AA240_.jpg
|
|
#6
 2008-10-05, 18:45
|
|
Regular
|
|
The Big Rock Candy Mountains
|
|
Re: Riemann Sum/Integral question
Thanks alot. That looks right.
By the way, is your location referring to the "paradise" or is it referring to the awesome, mind-shattering children's movie?
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51CZ600F5BL._SL500_AA240_.jpg
Hobo paradise. Never heard of the movie.
|
|
 |
 |
To the best of our knowledge, the text on this page may be freely reproduced and distributed.

totse.com certificate signatures
|
 |
 |
About | Community | Bad Ideas | Drugs | Ego | Erotica | Fringe | Society | Technology
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|